User talk:Darkmichael2000

The New 52
Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for working to improve the site with your edits to Dimitris Papaioannou, and your edits to The New 52 here and here, as we really appreciate your participation. However, the edits had to be reverted, because Wikipedia cannot accept unsourced material or original research. This includes material lacking cited sources, material obtained through personal knowledge, or which constitutes the an analysis or interpretation of by the editor that is not found in cited sources. Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the article text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here.

While your initial series of edits on The New 52 included a bare url to a Bleeding Cool story that contained information on market share, it did not make any mention of the other material you mentioned in your addition, such as the alienation of older fans, value judgments over the change in continuity, editorial matters, comparisons with Marvel NOW!, etc. In fact, the story made no mention of The New 52, or anything about the "fall of 2012".

In addition, a few things to keep in mind:
 * Wikipedia must be exhibit a neutral point of view. This means that it should not convey any opinion or viewpoint of its own, or of any editor. The only opinions that should be related are those that are explicitly attributed to reliable sources (as with, for example, Roger Ebert's opinion of a movie in an article about that movie, and only if supported by a citation.)
 * Wikipedia must be written in a dispassionate, formal tone tone. Placing exclamation points at the end of sentences for no reason, therefore, is not appropriate, since it conveys an unneeded emotional emphasis.
 * Seasons are not universal in all parts of the globe, so referring to times of the year as "fall of 2012" are unclear, and should be avoided. See WP:SEASON for more on this.

If you ever have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. :-) Nightscream (talk) 16:03, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

May 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors&#32; according to your reverts at The New 52. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. SudoGhost 16:50, 13 May 2013 (UTC)