User talk:Darkodazines

Welcome!

 * }

August 2013
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Borja GonzÃ¡lez has been reverted. Your edit here to Borja GonzÃ¡lez was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://rcdlc.blogspot.com/2013/08/borja-baston-joins-deportivo.html) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 12:30, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Darkodazines, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to PrimaveraReader (software) have been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. TonyBallioni (talk) 15:00, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi TonyBallioni. Thanks for helping me. The identical content and copyright violations are because CbaInc are using the content with permissions given by PrimaveraReader. CbaInc is a reseller of the software. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Darkodazines (talk • contribs) 17:18, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi, if that is the case it would still be a copyright violation: the content is owned by one party and they have let another party use it to sell it, but have not released it under a compatible license. Wikipedia requires explicit irrevocable release under a free license that is compatible with CC-BY-SA 3.0 for use. Also, as a quick question, have you ever edited under a different account before or are you paid for contributing? Thanks. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:25, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi TonyBallioni, I believe they've been resolved that on their Privacy and Terms page. See Privacy page on PrimaveraReader website. As for the edit, my colleague created the page from her account, and now I need to help and re-publish the page. Looking forward to keep helping me. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Darkodazines (talk • contribs) 17:43 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * PrimaveraReader terms make it abundantly clear that any content copied from their site is under copyright. This page has been deleted in the past as well. I will probably be taking it back to our articles for deletion page because I still do not feel it meets the criteria for inclusion, but it has sources from this month so it will probably need to be discussed again. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:04, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * TonyBallioni, what if editing of the Terms are made, and change of Wikipedia article as well? I just want to make a beautiful and informative page, and don't think it deserves a deletion, not at least changes in the Terms are made. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Darkodazines (talk • contribs) 18:12, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * You could change the terms of use of the material on the corporate website to say that all content on the website was licensed under CC-BY-SA 3.0 unported, then yes, the content wouldn't be a copyright violation. That would allow the one sentence I removed to be included. It wouldn't address the fundamental notability issues. Also, since you seem to be able to change the terms of use on the website, I'm going to ask again what your specific relationship to the company is: WP:PAID requires that you disclose if you are paid directly or indirectly for any work on Wikipedia. Also, please remember to sign your posts on talk pages. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:24, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I've read WP:PAID, and under those conditions, I'm in a relationship with the company Seavus. Darko Atanasov 18:49, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of PrimaveraReader (software) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article PrimaveraReader (software) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/PrimaveraReader (software)& until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:04, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
 * TonyBallioni, I see that you have nominated the article for deletion. Cam you please tell were is the promotional tone so I can reconsider changing it as promotion is not my intention. The references are from reliable and legit sources in the field of project scheduling, but in case some of them is not meeting the criteria I can remove it.

Nomination of XER (file format) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article XER (file format) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/XER (file format) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Power~enwiki (talk) 06:14, 7 September 2017 (UTC)