User talk:Darkphantom007

January 2021
Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that you recently removed content from Kolkata-class destroyer without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Adakiko (talk) 07:53, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Twin Engine Deck Based Fighter (TEDBF)
Hello Darkphantom007,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Twin Engine Deck Based Fighter (TEDBF) for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 21:22, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

June 2021
Hello, I'm McSly. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of active Indian military aircraft, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. McSly (talk) 13:59, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of active Indian military aircraft‎, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. McSly (talk) 15:37, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at List of equipment of the Indian Army, you may be blocked from editing. FDW777 (talk) 11:24, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of equipment of the Indian Army. FDW777 (talk) 11:32, 30 July 2021 (UTC)


 * If you don't like Wikipedia policies, then I suggest you stop editing Wikipedia. WP:BURDEN is not up for negotitation. FDW777 (talk) 11:46, 30 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Also, you will find the most frequent criticism of Wikipedia is the inaccurate information it contains. This is normally caused by people adding material without references, or amending without references. Just like you are doing... FDW777 (talk) 11:48, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

About no. of rafales
Is the no. correct since it was 23 in service and 13 on order Dredwing (talk) 15:02, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

List of active Indian military aircraft
 STOP  disruptive editing - Do NOT cram non-notable detailed information into table entrie(s)- the reader has Wikilink(s) to see detailed information on corresponding pages per WP:WHENTABLE. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at List of active Indian military aircraft, you will be blocked from editing - FOX 52 talk! 15:27, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Daniel Case (talk) 18:25, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Twin Engine Deck Based Fighter
Hello, Darkphantom007. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Twin Engine Deck Based Fighter, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Twin Engine Deck Based Fighter


Hello, Darkphantom007. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Twin Engine Deck Based Fighter".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:18, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

September 2021
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —Echo1Charlie (talk) 06:24, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

November 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at List of equipment of the Indian Army, you may be blocked from editing. Tayi Arajakate Talk 14:03, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on HAL Light Combat Helicopter. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. BilCat (talk) 21:42, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Disambiguation link notification for November 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited INS Surat (D69), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stealth. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Disruptive editing
Again  PLEASE STOP  being disruptive on the List of active Indian military aircraft page - You'er reverting back to outdated incorrect content with improper grammar. Like the EADS CASA C-295 and Dornier 228 aircraft are originated in Spain & Germany respectively, India is only a licensed manufacture, also no reason to mention the EMB-145 in the note section "Equipped with DRDO-developed Netra AEW&CS system on Embraer EMB-145 aircraft". Further you have reinstated  citation needed  tags on the Light Combat Helicopter limited production note, and the IAI Searcher numbers (which were sourced). I hope this helps you understand the changes made - lastly avoid edit warring as being blocked before, can happen again. Thank you - FOX 52 talk! 19:03, 23 December 2021 (UTC)


 * that's a little over the top. All of you should be making your best policy arguments (based on quality sources) on the article talk page (Talk:List of equipment of the Indian Army). Thanks. El_C 16:43, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

About Boeing 737 (reconnaissance ) of Indian air force
According to 'World Air Forces 2022' data Indian air force have 2 Boeing 737 aircraft for reconnaissance. Do we have to add that in the Wikipedia page of 'The active military aircraft of indian air force'? If yes, pls add the matter to the relevant page. Yours Sincerely Dredwing (talk) 18:20, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Hello. Boeing 737 are being used by Indian Air Force for transport of VVIP, not for reconnaissance. I think flightglobal guys got it wrong in the report. Darkphantom007 (talk) 20:30, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Need to do something about FOX52
This user is so annoying that he/she is always reverting back the page 'The active military aircraft of Indian Armed forces' without any sources to it's older version. Can him/her be temporarily suspended or barred for quite few days if he again reverts it back? Dredwing (talk) 16:07, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

February 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at List of active Indian military aircraft, you may be blocked from editing. You need to provide reliable sources that back up your changes - i.e. you need a source that explicitly says that India has only 70 MiG-21s, which the Hindustan Times source does not. Even if there are 4 squadrons that normally have a nominal strength of about 18 aircraft, using this to state that there is a total of only 70 is original research - aircraft may be held in storage or reserve. Do not misrepresent sourcesNigel Ish (talk) 10:33, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Arjun potential user
Hlo there, Seen your recent edit on arjun tanks page. I would also recommend you to add the colombia to the potential operators page as it have shown Keen interest to buy 110 arjun Mk1 tanks which didn't progress due to strict indian arms export laws. [Source: https://www.hindustantimes.com/india/a-first-foreign-interest-in-arjun-tank/story-stz3ErilImE0UUvTLpl2hM_amp.html ] James Bond 2004 (talk) 01:53, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)