User talk:Darkpumawins/sandbox

Article Evaluation
I chose the Philistines article, there was nothing that distracted me everything seemed to flow with the article. I feel as though in terms of religion and economy there could have been a bit more information it was quite light. This als goes for population as it does cover the needed stats it does not seem like it has enough meat to the passage. All of the references seemed reliable and the links work. The article had a B rating on it, and is also part of a WikiProject. The Wiki article get more in depth about the topics than we do in the books there is definitely more information covered. There is quite a bit of talk in the view pages everything friendly, mostly minor edits one did take out some information that was not useful. There is also a bit of sharing in the talk pages of useful info pretaining to the article.

Article Evaluation
I chose the article Operation Bagration, everything in the article appears to be on topic and is well written without any bias. There was an equal amount of representation in the article and all of the links checked appear to be functioning. For the most part everything seems to be unbiased and the majority of information appear to come from books with up to date and relevant information. It is a c rated article with room for improvement could go even more indepth if desired. It has not been talked about in class to my knowledge. My only question would be is there any more in depth information available for each of the offensives? Darkpumawins (talk) 04:47, 29 January 2018 (UTC)