User talk:Darkson/Archive 1

David Jones (Derby County F.C.)
According to soccerbase he joined in 2003, and they go by first team, as does wikipedia. -- Mattythewhite 11:04, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * No probs. -- Mattythewhite 11:07, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Games Workshop Online Community
Thank you for your edits to Games Workshop Online Community, and bringing the "Warvault" section to attention. There are a number of problems with the section, and I have removed it to the article's talk page.

However, the article is currently undergoing a discussion on whether it should be deleted; you may wish to give your input at the article's entry here. --Grimhelm 17:39, 8 January 2007 (UTC)


 * I wanted to thank you for your imput with SuperVideoGameKid. I would also request for you to come back to the community. There are quite a few stub pages that need help, more news articles need to be found about the games, the community, the video games, and any tournaments, and other resources need to be imputted. SanchiTachi 00:55, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * WP:TEA, I have made my feelings public here under May 2007. SanchiTachi 02:48, 24 May 2007 (UTC)


 * User:SanchiTachi/Graphic Novels Current is what I have so far (about 1/4th of the way done). If you have any resources, information, white dwarf articles on it that you can add, or put up info about on the talk page, I would greatly appreciate it. I am probably going to add it to the lexicanum instead of trying to fight with people who want to just put up a comics page (even though there is a page that already has all that information, I guess people love redundancy). SanchiTachi 18:05, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Vitacress HQ
Vitacress Group is headquartered in St Mary Bourne, Andover. See the official website http://www.vitacress.com/uk/contact.htm Page Up 01:29, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

vote
Is this your vote? — coe l acan t a lk  — 20:23, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, you've done it correctly now. Your vote will be counted. =) — coe l acan t a lk  — 20:42, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Minor edits
Hi, I've noticed that you mark most of your edits as minor, even though some of them are pretty major and add or change an article significantly. Please take a look at WP:MINOR to see which edits actually should count as minor. Thanks. Shrumster 05:05, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
 * If this is accidental because you have the "Mark all edits minor by default" option selected, you should probably un-select that option from the "my preferences" page. Marking major edits as minor is quite misleading for other editors. -- `/aksha 07:34, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

User pages
Please make sure that when you warn someone that you do it on their TALK page and not their USER page as you did with User:Manysince. Also please sign your warnings with --~ as it date stamps them. Thanks in advance --Samtheboy (t/c) 12:25, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Darkson! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 00:46, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Nomen Nescio Gnothi seauton 19:45, 19 April 2007(UTC)
 * Please check edits and articles before you accuse editors of vandalism. The section I removed was a fan-created Chapter, which the article's lead paragraphs expressly asks NOT to be posted. Removed it again.Darkson - BANG! 19:54, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Arbitration over 2007 AS Roma-Manchester United conflict
This article has been put up for arbitration. If you wish to make a statement regarding the arbitration over this article, you can do so at Requests for arbitration. Thank you. PeeJay 20:13, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

User RFC filing attempt
Hi there. I notice you attempted to start a user conduct RFC a couple of days ago, but don't seem to have followed the procedure properly. You actually have to create the RFC itself and fill in the template found here, with your justification for the RFC request, at Requests for comment/Kiminatheguardian to start the process. (Copying the template, then clicking onto the red link and pasting there, will get you started properly.) Don't forget to follow the requirements on the template with regards to summaries and diffs. Cheers! Tony Fox (arf!) 16:29, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

I'll make my case in due time.
I was talking about a collectors item. No one seems to be able to understand this. SuperVideoGameKid 20:04, 23 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Because that's the truth. I thought it was a fairly well known fact.  People often think otherwise, and the "openness" for suggestions, etc is simple a guise.  It really doesn't play out in the final product. SuperVideoGameKid 21:05, 23 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I've heard many stories from people inside things that it doesn't operate as collectively as it may appear. SuperVideoGameKid 21:16, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

I Welcome Your Support
I do welcome your support there, but the page is devoteed not to the comics (its not a Warhammer Monthly page) but to certain graphic novels and the miniatures that have been spawned off and the rules created for them in white dwarf. While there should be a warhammer comics page, the information included is not intended for that and should be a separate page. SanchiTachi 20:07, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I have stopped editing the refs into the punctuation. After this is done, I will bring up the issue on those pages. However, this guy doesn't seem wanting to respect any of the warhammer pages and wants to just spite me whereever he can. We already have pages devoteed to the individual comics, why can't they understand that and let there be a page devoteed to how the comics have melded into the game? Its too much information to go on individual comics pages. Meh. SanchiTachi 23:30, 25 May 2007 (UTC)


 * The model does not belong on that page. It needs to belong on an army page, but is not a current model. Why not use one of the many promotional art works instead? It would be better for the article than the miniature. SanchiTachi 00:16, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Editing of others words is not allowed. Removing of sections from your talk page is allowed, especially warnings from users about rule breaking. Please see the user page for this. A user talk page is for discussion, and has the luxury of being curtailled to the way the user wishes it to be. I cannot delete my history logs so it is impossible for me to remove something completely. SanchiTachi 00:29, 26 May 2007 (UTC)


 * The converted model is also a reason to not use it for the character page. You should probably use the official model. SanchiTachi 01:36, 26 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Someguy has recruited some of his friends to try and harass me about pictures, so I will have to wait a few days to do it. SanchiTachi 01:42, 26 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Mind telling me where I recruit them? — Someguy0830 (T | C) 01:46, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

SanchiTachi
You may be interested in participating in the WP:AN/I involving SanchiTachi. Finell (Talk) 05:37, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

David Beckham
Hey, i noticed you removed LA Galaxy from his clubs. According to the rest of the David Beckham article, his transfer is confirmed. Look at the Owen Hargreaves article with Manchester United. Let's discuss this. Jackrm 14:44, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Owen Hargreaves
I was implementing a compromise suggested by User:Martin tamb. If you have any issues with it please discuss here. Dave101 →talk  16:00, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

To fix your user page...
Replace your 'spacing' bit with :) -- Ipstenu (talk • contribs) 17:36, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Glad to help :) -- Ipstenu (talk • contribs) 15:45, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

SanchiTachi's socks
Hi. Just a quick note to say that I'm not sure it's actually worth reporting his socks anywhere (unless a specific IP address is actively vandalising, in which case WP:AIV is the right place). As I see it, they're obviously socks: we don't need a checkuser to tell us that (I suspect your latest request may be "declined as obvious"), and he's clearly on dynamic dial-up, so blocking really doesn't have any effect. From the looks of things, he gets addresses in (at least) a /17 range, and blocking just isn't going to happen given the relatively low level of trouble he's causing. Anyway, keep up the good work! Cheers --Pak21 16:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Checkuser Request
You recently compiled and listed a case at request for checkuser. A checkuser or clerk has asked that you list the code letter which matches with the violations of policy, which is listed at the top of the request for checkuser page. This has been implemented to reduce difficulties for checkusers, and is essential for your case to be processed in a timely manner. A link to your recently-created case which has this information missing is here. Thanks for your co-operation. GrooveDog 19:34, 17 June 2007 (UTC), checkuser clerk.

Whoa there!
I'm currently copyediting Baccara (at the request of the article editors) - you reverted my last entire copyedit. The article's talk page is tagged with the LoCE template "Copyedit in progress". No big deal, but I'd appreciate it if you check first next time ;) Regards EyeSereneTALK 20:18, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
 * No problem - thanks for the reply. I use TWINKLE myself, which occasionally has a mind of its own as well. The various anti-vandal & editing tools are great, but there should be some way of notifying all editors who use them that the scripter has decided to change the way they work... it'd save having to find out the hard way ;) EyeSereneTALK 20:28, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Fulgrim's fate
Hi there. While I dont have time to provide a citation, I assume the information changed on the Primarch page came from both the Sabertooth cards and the latest BL Horus Heresy book "Fulgrim", both of which support the daemon possession. Ta. Primarch 16:15, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * You'll also find the exact same sources depict Ferrus' death at his hands in no uncertain terms. Primarch 13:27, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

The Horus Heresy books are written in the Sabertooth CG world, "Horus Heresy". The game was discontinued and replaced by Dark Millenium. They are not directly controlled by GW's fiction writers (Gav Thorpe leads the department) nor do they follow the same story as put forth in the Warhammer 40,000 game. GW has not backed up any claims about Fulgrim being possessed, and the Fourth Ed Codex would need to be checked to see if they will. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.139.87.48 (talk • contribs)


 * Unregistered user, where do you get this information that Gav Thorpe is head of GW ficiton and IP? I'm sure Alan Merret, the current head of all GW fluff would be surprised to hear that another writer is claiming his role and position (see http://www.blacklibrary.com/author.asp?id=64). Es[ecailly since Gav Thorpe's work is subordinate to Alan. Please cite for me your verifiable source. In addition, you'll note that the novel "Fulgrim" released in the last few weeks by GW/BL supports Fulgrim's possession and Ferrus' beheading at his hands. You can't get more recent than that! Please make sure to research and use evidence to back up your claims in future, especially if you're going to alter articles willy nilly. Cheers Primarch 16:42, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Why don't you ask Gav? You obviously know nothing about GW if you don't realize that his job within GW is "Lead Background Designer" and head of all fiction within the Warhammer 40,000 world. Alan Merrit does not hold any position at Games Workshop. He only has a position at Black Library. They are different, and Black Library has no say over what goes in Codexes or Rulebooks. They are their own seperate company and have an alternate GW universe. You can call up the company and ask them yourself and they will tell you this information. Any shop clerk can tell you the information. You are the one putting in out of dated FAN FICTION in there. The Black Library accepts works from ANYONE and is not official. They never were official. If you want to talk about Warhammer 40,000, you better have a source from a legitimate, authorized source such as a Codex, a Rulebook, or the Website. Black Library is not an authorized and credible source when talking about this information. They are an alternate reality and have no standards. Furthermore, Alan Merrit has no real say or job, so you are a liar. Fulgrim was written for the no longer in production Horus Heresy card game. The game was replaced by Dark Millenium. But you obviously don't know what you are talking about, so it shows that you are spewing your ignorance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.139.51.43 (talk • contribs)

SanchiTachi - can you please stop using my talk page to spew your own brand of ignorance. You're banned or blocked - get other it. Any futher messages left on my page will be deleted. Darkson (Yabba Dabba Doo!) 21:31, 14 July 2007 (UTC)


 * I didn't realise this user was already banned/blocked! In any case Darkson, I appreciate your reasoned approach to wiki, even when you and I disagree at times! Primarch 02:16, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Tau
I made a mistake reading the timestamps, apparently - I was going through contribs reverting vandal edits by that IP, and I must have thought I was looking at the current version. Sorry about that! MSJapan 00:11, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Humour
For the record: 13 colonies box - funny. Do I agree with the sentiment seriously? No. Cleared up. Good. Also like the humour jibe ;) Toon 23:29, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

My apologies
The "get your facts straight" comment wasn't directed at you, but at the person who introduced the information to the article in the first place, so I apologise for accidentally offending you. That said, I do agree with you that perhaps it was a little harsh. I just rather wish that people would check what they are writing about before they write it. Again, sorry. - PeeJay 01:09, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

View comments
Helllo! I hope you are feeling great. I would like to have your opinion with regards to my comments here. Your opinion would be valuable here. -- S iva1979 Talk to me 04:55, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Gabriel Heinze
Hello and thanks for rv in Gabriel Heinze. I missed one on my previous revert. The page has been hectic with unsourced speculation from anonymous IPs today. I asked for semi-protection already. BTW, you seem to have made a typo in occansionally in you page. Cheers! -- Alexf (t/c) 17:25, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Manchester United F.C. seasons
This article is now a Featured List candidate. Please feel free to leave your comments at the candidacy page. - PeeJay 19:13, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Chaos Space Marines
See Suspected sock puppets/Disturbedrcool1, but that was mostly just to get the socks blocked. The inital socks had the "account creation blocked" flag set on their blocks, so the master's obviously coming back from a different IP address to create the new accounts. You could list the new socks at WP:AIV to get them blocked, but at the moment it doesn't really seem worth it. Cheers --Pak21 13:53, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

28mm
"Alongside the rights to reprint ICE's Middle Earth Role Playing, Citadel Miniatures acquired the rights to produce 28 mm miniatures based on Lord of the Rings and The Hobbit. "

Are these the same rights as used in The Lord of the Rings SBG or a different set? --Grimhelm 14:53, 18 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Well, I know from my own comparisons that the current miniatures are the same height as some 25mm miniatures I have that were produced by another company. The SBG article quotes the following:


 * "Note that these figures are 25 mm and not the 28 mm figures that are more popular today"; 


 * As far as I know, the reasoning behind this was to prevent conversions using pieces Warhammer and LotR minis together. I think you're right about an earlier range being 28mm though, as the article also comments on "an unrelated series of Lord of the Rings models" that GW had in the 1980s. --Grimhelm 15:36, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Games Workshop Online Community AfD
Since we were talking about something similar (well, relatively similar ;-) ) just a few days ago, I thought you might be interested to know that Games Workshop Online Community is nominated for deletion. I already added my own comment at Articles for deletion/Games Workshop Online Community. --Grimhelm 22:25, 23 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Sorry, wrong link... The discussion is at: Articles for deletion/Games Workshop Online Community (2nd nomination)   --Grimhelm 17:26, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

RE: the section you linked to isn't the comments and criticisms section I was under the impression had been removed. That is what I was looking for, am I mistaken in this case?--RichSatan 22:42, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
 * thanks, I replaced the section mostly following the admin's suggestions. come help clean it up if you wish. —Preceding unsigned comment added by RichSatan (talk • contribs) 06:22, 4 November 2007 (UTC)