User talk:Darkson/Archive 3

Space Marine Chapter List
Hi Darkson,

I was just wondering whether you could give me a hand with something-the Hellfire Dragons Chapter on the List looks extreemly fishy and I can't find any non-wikipedia info on it anywhere, could you have a look as well? I feel as if I need an ally before I delete the section. You don't have to if you don't want to. I also put my findings on the discussion page for anyone else to see.

Thanks --TEA14 (talk) 17:25, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Ps sorry if I put this on the wrong page

Thanks a lot --TEA14 (talk) 11:58, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Wembley
Blimey, you're right, that page is a mess. Anyway, I've removed as many references to Wembley being a five star stadium as I could find. I only wish that UEFA were more open about their stadia list. – PeeJay 17:49, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

ok
oh i seeeeeeeeee, but still you said i should apologise for calling him an idiot then you called me one so basically shut the fuck up... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.156.170.254 (talk • contribs)

Thanks for the info
Thanks, that sets my mind at ease a bit about all the WH40K stuff. :) I might take a look at the ANI report in greater detail when I get a chance, but I'm not an admin anyway so if blocking needs done, we'll still have to ask one of them to do it.  Best of luck --Jaysweet (talk) 17:15, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

No idea
No idea I'm afraid. --Allemandtando (talk) 12:15, 29 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Yes of course you are right. It's just it's desperately depressing to have to delete hours and hours of other people's work - you might ask "why do it?" because nobody else wants to! I'm going to have to start alternating between do this type of work and... something else here as it's starting to drive me funny. --Allemandtando (talk) 23:20, 29 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Because it will eventually be a generic description of type - I need to keep one of each type to remind of what's used in the game. --Allemandtando (talk) 23:30, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

I've got to say - I find it "odd" to say the least of the amount of ip editors who turned up at my page last night, you haven't been recruiting off-site have you? --Allemandtando (talk) 09:16, 30 June 2008 (UTC)


 * No problem - I was hoping to avoid this route, but I'll have to start to AFD the articles onmass. --Allemandtando (talk) 09:34, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Citation for 'Leading'
Re:Manchester United & RedCafe. 'Leading' comes from Redcafe.net's own title text. It's probably not good to use the website itself as a reference for it, but I think it's position as the leading site is fairly undisputed. It's described as 'One of the leading' here http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/football/premier_league/manchester_united/article4319392.ece If you want to remove 'leading' then fine, but I think without it, it detracts from it's noteworthiness. Kie (talk) 01:26, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

(c)
I intend to...but I didn't realise I'd done it twice. Smell ya later. slυмgυм [ ←→ &#93; 22:53, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

...see here slυмgυм [ ←→ &#93; 02:45, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Re:Theplansthattheyhavemade
I've requested that page to be fully protected. Let's just hope that this gets ended soon... Schfifty Three  21:17, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅. Sorry 'bout that...  weburiedoursecretsinthegarden  21:25, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Manchester United task force
Would you care to join the Manchester United task force? If so, please add your name here. Also, please, do please spread this message around. We need help. Seriously! ĤéĺĺвοЎ (talk) 13:39, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Just to let you know
I think you should know that user:Realist2's recent edit revert on the David Beckham page over the soon to be deleted Metrosexual category, is based on his personal vendetta towards me and has nothing to do with the Beckham article. Caden S ( talk ) 14:22, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Welbeck
Good thinking adding that comment. Well done. Calebrw (talk) 17:53, 28 July 2008 (UTC)