User talk:Darkson/Archive 4

Unexplained undo
You undid my banner removal, but didn't say why.  Pagra shtak  19:04, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Because I've no idea why you're removing the Warhammer 40K banner from the article.
 * But don't worry about it, put it back if you want. I momentarily forgot that I now longer give a rats-arse about the 40K articles on Wikipedia, after the Allementaro (or whatever his name was) debacle - I must have missed the Grey Knights page when I removed all the 40K articles from my watchlist. It's been removed now, so do as you like. Darkson (BOOM! An interception!) 22:55, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I explained it in my edit summary. That page is now a redirect (another user merged the content), so I removed the banner.  Pagra shtak  04:33, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Squad numbers
The Man Utd squad list on the official website always uses numbers from 99 downwards as placeholder numbers for players who have no number so far. – PeeJay 08:21, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Come on, man. Don't be like this. We both know that it's 99.999999999% likely that Fabio will not get the #98 jersey this season, and we also both know that the squad list on the website is notoriously unreliable for this sort of thing. Let's just leave them both without numbers and wait for official confirmation of the ones they've been given. – PeeJay 15:32, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Blood Angels
I saw you posting at User_talk:Pagrashtak and I thought you could help me. Please review this and this. I believe that I could create a page from many of the reviews that I have found, incorporate primary sources, and establish something that is rich, notable, details everything in a neutral, objective, an real manner, and satisfy everyone's problems. However, I would need help with the primary information, and help tracking down some reliable third party sources. I've already found 12 links to product information and reviews. If I am bothering you or wasting your time, I am sorry. However, I saw the topic, did a little research, and I am willing to put in some of my side efforts for the encyclopedia. Ottava Rima (talk) 20:08, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Project activity
This message is a test to check to see if members of the Warhammer 40K Project are still online, active and interested in helping the project. If you are no longer interested in the project all you need to do is...nothing! If you don't respond to this I'll take your name off the list and you'll never here from us again. If you're the proactive type you can remove the name yourself or talk to me and I'll do it.

If you are still interested in helping out the 40K project or otherwise still want to be listed there you can say so in response to this message on your talk page or on mine. Alternately you can add our new userbox (User WikiProject Warhammer 40,000) to your userpage and I'll take that as a response. The userpage doesn't automatically include people in a category of members yet, but it might in the future.

We've assessed most of the articles in the project on the Version 1.0 assessment scale (the table on the project page should take a few days to update) but we need to push to get the core articles in the project up to GA status. Thanks for all your help. Let me know if there is anything I can do to help the project along. Protonk (talk) 21:03, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Inactive?
Hey man, I saw your notice of inactivity over at WP:MUFC! Who's pissed you off? Maybe we can sort it out. – PeeJay 17:56, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
 * No worries, dude. Look forward to seeing you back here soon. Take care. – PeeJay 18:02, 8 October 2008 (UTC)