User talk:Darkurza88

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! RJFJR (talk) 03:31, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Barbara Lerner Spectre
I don't have an opinion one way or the other (though it seems to me that the entire section needs better sourcing), but why do you feel the need to presume there's something going on, some conspiracy, to keep things hidden? It is so unwarranted and boring. Drmies (talk) 00:57, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Better sourcing would be great. What she stated has caused controversy which isn't denied so leaving the full quote on the page would give the readers a better idea of what was said and would permit them to make their own judgements. Darkurza88 (talk) 01:06, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
 * But that doesn't explain the edit summary. Also, please don't overestimate the idea of letting the reader form their judgment. I assume the quote was in the source anyway, and if it wasn't it wasn't a good source. Drmies (talk) 01:20, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Take a look at the history of that page. That quote (source can be found in this YouTube video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-7ldT3YL2Kw) has been added, removed and re-added dozens of times so clearly, it is contentious. I disagree with you regarding your underestimation of the reader to form his own opinion. This is an encyclopedia and thus should present relevant information. Darkurza88 (talk) 01:46, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes, but that has nothing to do with any "opinion". Drmies (talk) 01:47, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
 * What is that video? Where did it came from? And did you see what the caption said? And what, I wonder, might that have to do with your username? Drmies (talk) 01:50, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
 * That video shows her saying what she was quoted saying. Regarding the quote, was Barbara Lerner Spectre quoted properly and cited? Yes. Has the quote been used properly? Yes, it is described as a controversial remark. I'm not sure what the problem is. The readers can read the controversial remark and verify the source if they wish. Darkurza88 (talk) 01:54, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
 * It really doesn't matter where that video came from. She was giving and interview and those were her words. I am well aware of what the caption says and I do not see how it changes anything. You are free to make any assumptions regarding my username. I like to keep people in suspense. Darkurza88 (talk) 01:56, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
 * It is only a "controversial" quotes because a bunch of neo-Nazis twisted it into something it is not, like you were doing: "she calls for the destruction of traditional Europe and for the destruction of ethnic European people, in the name of diversity" is an obvious lie. I suppose the idea is that the audience for these videos and this text is too dumb or too lazy to actually see what was happening--well, no one has ever accused neo-Nazis and alt-righters of being active intellectuals--is that what you were thinking? I don't know, of course, what your intentions were--I'm like totally in suspense. In the meantime, I am going to block you for a disgusting BLP violation and the suspicion of having a Hitlerian username. You may try to convince an admin that I'm completely wrong, of course: good luck. Drmies (talk) 02:03, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

September 2018
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 02:04, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Just passing through here. Darkurza88 you said that you read the book: The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements. This pretty much expose you of being anti Semitic. Especially using a book that’s been debunked many times thanks it’s use of cherry picking words and half truths. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:1970:4B61:7C00:D8DA:A496:B0BD:DE6B (talk) 03:17, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
 * It's not about the quote: it's about your "she calls for the destruction of traditional Europe and for the destruction of ethnic European people", which you invented, because no reasonable, competent person could distill that from her comments. Drmies (talk) 02:19, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
 * If you look at the history, I undid previous changes which would have included the entire block. Others have done the same. Rather than modifying the descriptive part, they erased the entire section. Also, I was in the process of rewording that entire section when I was abruptly blocked from editing. Darkurza88 (talk) 02:32, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Based on what criteria do you accuse me of being an anti-Semite or even having Nazi tendencies? Do you even know what those things mean?Darkurza88 (talk) 02:59, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Well, you are accusing a Jewish individual of seeking to destroy Europe and you have 88 in your username. The math seems pretty clear, and like, I personally doubt that given the circumstances, this is a reference to your late grandmother. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:12, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Perhaps you should look at the edit history of the page. I undid a previous edit and then inserted a citation. I didn't even make a content change when I was blocked. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Darkurza88 (talk • contribs) 03:17, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
 * I saw the history, and that amongst other things also suggests to me that this is not your first account. So here's where we are: two admins think you're an anti-Semetic troll with neo-Nazi tendencies who is inserting BLP violations into an article about a Jewish woman. You just keep repeating yourself and saying things that don't really add up. I'm not unblocking you, but you can appeal the block again and another admin will review it. You'll need to explain to them how you know a bunch of fancy things about Wikipedia as a Lazarus account and you'll need to explain better why you thought it was a good idea to restore anti-Semetic nonsense, and you'll need to explain why you have a neo-Nazi meme in this username. You thus far haven't done that. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:24, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
 * I've had this account since 2009 and no, I don't have another account nor do I make regular edits. 88 is a number that could represent anything and to not use it because neo Nazis use it is absolutely ridiculous. I won't stop using 88 anytime soon. Looking at the edit history, the edit made on (20:24, 17 August 2018) removed valid information with the accusation that it was added by Nazi trolls. There was no username associated with that edit. From that point on, I can't make sense of the changes any more. If you must know how I know of this living person, I've been reading the book "The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements" in which she is mentioned with this very quote in the Preface to the First Paperback Edition. You are running out of arguments. You accuse me of anti semitism with nazi tendencies without proof, just hunches. I present evidence that I only undid an edit and you further assert that I am accusing a Jewish individual of seeking to destroy Europe. You realize that that is the title of the source. Her words remain unchanged in all of the other copies of the video. This is quite an interesting situation. It's anti semitic to quote a Jewish individual's controversial statement. It's also anti semitic to defend yourself against accusations of anti semitism.Darkurza88 (talk) 03:58, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm just a passerby stopping to voice my agreement with Drmies and Tony. Only an blithering idiot would buy the excuses presented here, and I'm reasonably certain no blithering idiots will be involved in this. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants   Tell me all about it.  12:57, 6 September 2018 (UTC)