User talk:Darkwind/Archive 12

GOCE August 2015 newsletter

 * sent by via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:43, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 August 2015

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

New Account, Thompson20, being used by Mrmike1695 (user blocked by you)
Hello DW. You blocked a problematic user who has used multiple IPs and has a very blatant MO before. He is without a doubt operating currently as User talk:Thompson20. I don't know how to open an official sock puppet investigation and I don't do many of those ANI etc things as they require far too much formatting. If you could take a look into this user's edit history, and see some of the exact same details exhibited by MrMike, that'd be appreciated. Thanks! JesseRafe (talk) 15:13, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (clergy)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (clergy). Legobot (talk) 00:06, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Jimmy Jam tells the truth about how Alexander O'Neal left the Time
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.79.88.70 (talk) 04:24, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 August 2015

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:59, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Page protection/dispute resolution on Shockwave (video game)
Hi. I'm unclear how I'm supposed to proceed from here. For that matter, I'm unclear on why it was decided to protect Stormwatch's version of the articles. Prior to merging the article, I put up a merger proposal with complete reasoning, put the appropriate tags on both articles, asked for input from relevant WikiProjects, and waited the requisite seven days. Stormwatch took no action during all this time, but within minutes of my completing the arduous work of merging, he reverted my edits with no justification. He has still not attempted to justify his reverts or resolve the dispute on a talk page, just posted flame bait on my personal talk page and reported me for edit warring. He can't even seem to keep straight what it is he wants; when he first started reverting, he was restoring the content to have two separate articles on the same exact subject, whereas now his reverts are for a merge to Shockwave (video game). Is this sort of behavior really now considered the appropriate way to establish consensus?--Martin IIIa (talk) 12:10, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 September 2015

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:07, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Invitation to subscribe to the edit filter mailing list
Hi, as a user in the edit filter manager user group we wanted to let you know about the new wikipedia-en-editfilters mailing list. As part of our recent efforts to improve the use of edit filters on the English Wikipedia it has been established as a venue for internal discussion by edit filter managers regarding private filters (those only viewable by administrators and edit filter managers) and also as a means by which non-admins can ask questions about hidden filters that wouldn't be appropriate to discuss on-wiki. As an edit filter manager we encourage you to subscribe; the more users we have in the mailing list the more useful it will be to the community. If you subscribe we will send a short email to you through Wikipedia to confirm your subscription, but let us know if you'd prefer another method of verification. I'd also like to take the opportunity to invite you to contribute to the proposed guideline for edit filter use at WP:Edit filter/Draft and the associated talk page. Thank you! Sam Walton (talk) and  MusikAnimal  talk  18:22, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 September 2015

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:00, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject World's Oldest People
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject World's Oldest People. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

David Laudat Page
Hi, I noticed David didn't have a wikipedia page and found out it was deleted. Apparently it was the content below. He is referenced throughout wikipedia in places such as wannabe tv show and david gilmour session musician. I'm happy to help in any way to get this back online.

Best wishes

Matt

Removed page content:

He began his vocal coaching career in 1996 with East 17, before being asked to train the Spice Girls for their first live dates and subsequent world tour.[1] Since then David has built a reputation as one of the UK's leading vocal coaches, working with artists such as:

Jamelia, Blazing Squad, Ash, Jordan (Katie Price), Peter Andre, Westlife, All Saints, Spice Girls, Five, E-17, Asian Dub Foundation, Liberty X, Brian Harvey, 100 Reasons, The Honeyz, Heather Small (M-People), Dina Carroll, Big Brovaz, G4, Lisa Maffia.

David has even worked with non-singers such as the presenters of Blue Peter and CBBC’s Bring It On, as well as celebrities like Ant & Dec, Dick & Dom "aka Richard McCourt and Dominic Wood", and Chantelle from "Celebrity Big Brother". David has also appeared on "E4's School of Performing Arts", David was one of the judges "experts" for 2 seasons of ITV's “X-Factor, as well as being on the judges panel for a new reality TV show for VH1 called "Wannabe".

As a lead vocalist, David scored a top 10 UK hit with US hip-hop band "The Bucketheads", who went to number 1 with the phenomenal dance classic “The Bomb (these sounds fall into my mind)”. David has also had a top 10 album in Japan with the Pop group “ Love City Groove”, as well as a number 1 in Italy and several European dance hits as a solo artist.

Other artists whom David has worked with as a session singer include:

E-17, Take That, Robson & Jerome, Tom Jones, Ben E. King, Peter Andre, Daryl Hall, Lionel Richie, Louise, Beverley Knight, Ronan Keating, Pete Cox (Go West), David Gilmour (Pink Floyd), George Michael, Martine McCutcheon, Dina Carroll. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vascowiki2 (talk • contribs) 11:30, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Pistolplay’s new account
Pistolplay is created a new account name Pistolplay3 after two months. He/she focusing on mainly Maroon 5’s pages. 123.136.111.134 (talk) 04:36, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Continuous vandalism by User:Bikaz
You had blocked a User, Bikaz, he is continuously involved in edit warring and vandalism. A very new ID is also supporting him at Ahmed Raza Khan page. Just analyse and see how many editors have warned him his contributions are against consensus every where and he is in no mood to listen any one. ScholarM (talk) 06:05, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

You might be busy and sorry to tell you but Bikaz is continue with his behavior again. ScholarM (talk) 08:50, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 September 2015

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:43, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 September 2015

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:24, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 September 2015

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:35, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 07 October 2015

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:20, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 October 2015

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:39, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 October 2015

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015 GOCE newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 October 2015

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:11, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 November 2015

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:28, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 November 2015

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:09, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 November 2015

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:27, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 November 2015

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:27, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

About the article "Anti-islamism"
Hi, I saw your edit in Anti-islamism and I noticed that now the article Criticism of Islamism exist, so I was wondering if you could redirect the article Anti-islamism to that location if it's not much trouble, since it makes more sense. Regards. Rupert Loup (talk) 00:17, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 December 2015

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:22, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Just a quick question
I have notice that you have recently blocked User:Anaxagoras13. Just before you did it would appear that this user made two "rollbacks" on the baseball links I made (please see) 2001_Baseball_World_Cup and Baseball_World_Cup. please could you tell me why, is it due to an error on my behalf or is it okay to revert back?<font face="Vivaldi" color="red" size="5px">LoVeNoTwAr101 <font face="Vivaldi" color="Green" size="4px">Lets Talk 18:31, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 December 2015
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">
 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:39, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 December 2015
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">
 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:57, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 December 2015
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">
 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:34, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 January 2016
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">
 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:47, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mesh blocks
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mesh blocks. Legobot (talk) 00:07, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 January 2016
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">
 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:17, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 January 2016
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">
 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:21, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Militia occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Militia occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

January 2016
Just letting you know there is a report at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring which concerns you.--NukeofEarl (talk) 16:47, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 January 2016
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">
 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:24, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 03 February 2016
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">
 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Eminem
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Eminem. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Article titles
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Article titles. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Lead section
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Lead section. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Article titles
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Article titles. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors April 2016 Newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:47, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Siouxsie and the Banshees
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Siouxsie and the Banshees. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

What is going on?
To Darkwind: One of my students reports that: I'm "blocked my an administrator in response to abuse". I'm not sure why this would be but its not letting me get onto Wikipedia. I am told this was your doing. I have looked at her user and user/talk pages, as well as another student's sandbox where she was working on a project overseen by the Wiki Education foundation. Please explain why you have taken this action, and why you have given no explanation to the student. This project is a major part of the grade for my history of psychology class, and now the student is blocked from participating. user:Ian (Wiki Ed) user:ragesoss J.R. Council (talk) 16:29, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
 * FYI, Ian at Wiki Ed says: I suspect she tried to edit while logged out. Darkwind has only preformed two blocks this year, both of IP addresses in Asia. In addition, it looks like he almost only does "anon only" blocks. So my guess is that the IP she was editing from was blocked, and she didn't realize that she was logged out. (Note: she was probably editing from a university cluster computer.) J.R. Council (talk) 16:49, 19 April 2016 (UTC)


 * I recently blocked only anonymous users (i.e., anyone who is not logged in with an account) from the IP address range 112.118.128.0/19 (which is any IP between 112.118.128.0 and 112.118.159.255) due to repeated vandalism and attempts to evade more specific, less impactful blocks. The block was for a period of 36 hours starting at 20:50 UTC, 14 April 2016.  You can see the error message a logged-out user would have received here: schoolblock. The user in question should have been able to edit while logged in, and the block would have expired at 16 April 2016 08:50 UTC in any case.


 * To be honest, I could have used a more helpful block ("error") message like rangeblock, and I do apologize for any confusion the student experienced. I can reassure you that no action was taken by me against any specific user in this case. –Darkwind (talk) 05:48, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Collapse top
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Collapse top. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Requesting permission to reclaim content of deleted article
I want to continue to work on and improve the article Edward William Cornelius Humphrey, which you deleted. Given the Wikipedia guidelines, I am not able to undelete the article without first consulting you. If I can't undelete the article, I will need instead to reclaim its content. Thanks.Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 14:43, 2 May 2016 (UTC)


 * After another review of the deletion discussion, I don't see any way my closure as "delete" was in error; the consensus was clearly that Mr. Humphrey is not considered sufficiently notable by Wikipedia guidelines. To be more specific, the consensus was that none of the following are sufficient to convey notability: being a member of the Presbyterian general assembly or one or more of its subcommittees, being a typical lawyer or judge, or being a college trustee.


 * I am happy to place a copy of the last version of the article in your user space so that you may access the text and possibly improve the article, but please be aware that you must address the notability concerns raised in the AfD discussion before moving the article back to article space. Otherwise, it is likely the article would fail another deletion discussion.  What this basically means is that you need to find and document something else that he is notable for, in order to restore this as a regular article.


 * You can find the copy of the article at User:Mitzi.humphrey/Edward William Cornelius Humphrey. –Darkwind (talk) 12:53, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you, Darkwind (talk), for making the text once again available at User:Mitzi.humphrey/Edward William Cornelius Humphrey. Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 14:40, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Japan-related articles
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Japan-related articles. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Deprecation warnings
I notice that User:Darkwind/waLib.js causes a bunch of deprecation warnings. Can you fix them, or would you be okay with me fixing them? Jackmcbarn (talk) 01:15, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Remember me...
Do you get to remember me last year? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.82.14.181 (talk) 01:32, 20 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Nobody talking? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.82.14.181 (talk) 01:41, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Avedis Zildjian Company
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Avedis Zildjian Company. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Imelda Marcos
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Imelda Marcos. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Layout
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Layout. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

71.68.160.54
You said the edits from aren't vandalism. They added George Jones' "You Couldn't Get the Picture" to Deaton-Flaingen's list of directed videos even though it was directed by Marc Ball  and Keith Whitley's "When You Say Nothing at All" and "I'm No Stranger to the Rain" to Michael Salomon's list of directed videos  even though they were directed by Stephen Buck  and the rest of their edits have added music videos that don't even exist. They never add sources, warnings to their talk page have gone ignored and they've been blocked twice before for the same behaviour. Eric444 (talk) 11:30, 8 July 2016 (UTC)


 * I think what you're missing here is the distinction between vandalism and other types of inappropriate edits. Just because an edit results in a factual error doesn't automatically make it vandalism. To quote policy:


 * "Even if misguided, willfully against consensus, or disruptive, any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia is not vandalism. Edit warring over content is not vandalism. Careful consideration may be required to differentiate between edits that are beneficial, edits that are detrimental but well-intentioned, and edits that are vandalism."

- Vandalism


 * None of what you describe is obvious vandalism, in the sense that determining the user's intention would be required to differentiate between "trying to be helpful, but is wrong" (which is disruptive, but not vandalism) and "intentionally trying to damage the articles" (vandalism). That makes your report inappropriate for AIV, which is a forum for requesting quick, decisive action, and does not allow for discussion or for the editor to defend themselves. –Darkwind (talk) 21:03, 8 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The user has been making similar edits since November 2015 with increasing frequency, sometimes with misleading edit summaries like "added links" or "fixed grammar", and my messages on their talk page asking them to stop have gone ignored. They've added incorrect information to Michael Salomon's article six times in the last month and Deaton-Flanigen Production's article five times. They added incorrect information to Steven Goldmann's article again this afternoon. At what point does it cross the line from "trying to be helpful" to "intentionally trying to damage the articles"? What can be done to prevent these edits in the future? Eric444 (talk) 21:57, 8 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Again, just to be clear, I wasn't trying to say that I thought the user's edits were appropriate. My specific point, in declining your report at AIV, was that it was going to take me longer than ~30 seconds to figure out, so it wasn't obvious enough for an AIV report. You can try opening a thread at WP:ANI the next time they're actively disrupting (maybe now?), that's where most disruptive-but-more-subtle cases go. Don't forget to leave a talk page message informing the anonymous editor of your ANI thread. –Darkwind (talk) 22:05, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Civilization Beyond Earth RT article for deletion discussion
The page Civilization: Beyond Earth - Rising Tide has been nominated for deletion. You have been invited to participate in the discussion Oldag07 (talk) 23:29, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

recent edits to Ruth Faden bio page
Hi, I received a message that you'd removed my recent edits for being less than neutral. I'll clarify: the list of articles posted for Dr. Faden hadn't been updated in many years. I simply replaced the dated list, with a list of recent publications that she has authored. (they are collected and link to pubmed). I'm the director of outreach for the Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics, merely trying to update her info. thanks.Aregenberg (talk) 20:09, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Ah, actually, I see that you rejected the edits from the other day to her bio. The biography I replaced, again, was out of date (particularly in not noting that she has stepped down as director, and remains the wagley professor.) the new biography reflects this change - which is very important for the field of bioethics. Aregenberg (talk) 20:11, 12 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The update to her list of works is probably fine (although, as an editorial matter, the list is looking a little too long and too detailed compared to the rest of the information we have in the article about her). What I was referring to was the edits you made to the biographical material in the first couple of paragraphs, which came across as way over the top in upselling the institute.


 * Sentences like "she transformed what was an informal interest group of faculty across Johns Hopkins into one of the leading and largest bioethics programs in the world" and are considered unencyclopedically promotional, and are not generally accepted by the Wikipedia editorial community. Also, because this is an encyclopedia article, standard biographical information such as birth date and place, etc. are desired.


 * Also, since you work(ed) with her, there is an inherent conflict of interest here. In general, we strongly prefer that employees of an institution do not directly edit articles about the institution or their colleagues; the excessively promotional language I mentioned is one of those reasons.  I will add some conflict-of-interest information to your talk page momentarily. –Darkwind (talk) 20:16, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

BbradleyLA COI
Thanks for the insight. As a newbie I am unfamiliar with the rules but noticed a lot of nonrelevant information and broken links on a page about my work. While I imagine there are very few people who contribute to a topic in which they have absolutely no personal interest or involvement, I'm happy if you'd like to delete my contributions and return my page to its previous state or provide me with insight on the appropriate way I might adjust misinformation about myself

Thanks for your time and help and contributions to this resource! , — Preceding unsigned comment added by BbradleyLA (talk • contribs) 21:51, 12 July 2016 (UTC)


 * First, three quick tips. 1) Don't indent your paragraphs with a space. The MediaWiki software interprets that as "please make this paragraph a fixed-width font".  2) There's no need to  me when you write on my own talk page; editors automatically get informed of edits to their own talk pages.  I have to ping you if I write here because you don't automatically get notified. 3) Don't forget to sign your comments on a talk page with four tildes ~ .  In this case, a bot came along and did it for you.


 * Second, thank you for being up-front about your editing goals. We absolutely welcome contributions from everyone, it's just that we've found that people with conflicts-of-interest have a great deal of difficulty focusing on Wikipedia's editorial goals and standards. Many people tend to upsell themselves or their organizations, downplay any negativity, and generally just try to make the article as flattering as possible.  Wikipedia's goals, on the other hand, are to have neutrally-written and verifiable information in every article.


 * As for your actual path to achieving the goal of up-to-date information in articles you are related to, I suggest following the steps in this page to use the request edit template. That template will add your proposed changes to a list, and an experienced Wikipedia editor will come around eventually, review the changes, possibly suggest alterations, and ideally, make the changes you've requested. That way, you can work with an interested editor to avoid promotional language and "whitewashing", but still get the information in the articles to be as up-to-date and accurate as possible. –Darkwind (talk) 22:07, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Recent block
I see you recently blocked a vandal. They are back making the same edits Zekenyan (talk) 05:06, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mahindra Enforcer (PBA team)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mahindra Enforcer (PBA team). Legobot (talk) 04:28, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

UFC 200 situation
Hey, just noticed I thought Renzoy16 was an admin... So I restored it again before a proper decision here. If you considered that as part of the edit warring: my bad, really thought there was an admin input earlier. Anyways, I'm not restoring it again if it comes to it. If he pulls off that same edit, I'll recall the warning I sent on the IP talk page and this discussion before proper measures. A edit dispute should be dealt with, sure. But if someone shows up proposing changes, he's the one that needs to propose a discussion. I always find it difficult to be dealt with. Edit war apparently can't exist without two people in it. So if someone disruptively (but it does not fit vandalism) edits a page, how can it be restored without putting myself in harm's way? Gsfelipe94 (talk) 00:39, 18 July 2016 (UTC)


 * I'm not sure why he's just randomly commenting on ANEW reports, but I don't exactly blame you for taking the advice. As for the article, honestly, at this point just leave it as it is; I'm not worried about your last edit there, since neither you nor the IP editor broke 3RR.


 * In regards to your more general question of how best to deal with this situation, I think the first thing you have to remember is not to panic when you think someone's pushing bad formatting, misinformation, POV edits, etc. into an article. If you revert an edit you percieve as bad, and the editor puts it back in, it's OK if the bad edits stay there for a short time while you work through dispute resolution processes. Just because the other editor isn't following the suggested "bold, revert, discuss" cycle doesn't mean you shouldn't.  If you revert, and he puts it back in without discussion, you should start a discussion, and if he doesn't participate, use dispute resolution steps to achieve a consensus. –Darkwind (talk) 03:21, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Fine. I created a discussion and just saw he reverted it once again. I've (most certainly in vain) added a pingback on the IP's talk page. Let's see the discussion. If he ignores it, I'm sure he's done. Thanks. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 17:49, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

sorry
i am very sorry but my intention was not to vandalize wikipedia, i just wanted to edit the article that was missing a few details that i read on other sites and books, i do not know how to edit. please help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Musawinxclub16 (talk • contribs) 16:04, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Looks like it's time for an indef block
Remember when you said did not have the maturity necessary to participate constructively as an editor? Well, he just made these edits to his talk page, and his immaturity is on full display here. <font color="000FF">Electric <font color="00FFFF">Burst (Electron firings)(Zaps) 14:39, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

I did nothing! TylerNguyen1 (talk) 21:56, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bombardier Movia & CNR Changchun C951
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bombardier Movia & CNR Changchun C951. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

User has been blocked again for edit warring
I've closed a 3RR complaint by blocking both parties for 24 hours. You have blocked the person named in the complaint on July 15 and may be concerned about the long-term pattern. If you think my block ought to be longer, feel free to modify it. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 15:25, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of senior officers of the Argentine Navy
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of senior officers of the Argentine Navy. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors September 2016 News
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:36, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of bus routes in London
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of bus routes in London. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Request to unblock?
Hello, Ryan, I am sorry if I am not doing this the right way, but I would like to do either of the following: 1. Ask what I did to cause my account to be blocked, and/or 2. Request that the block be lifted.

I see that some other people blocked me too but I am at a loss for the reason. I honestly try to make mostly corrections to grammar or add information about which i have personal knowledge.

Again, I apologize for bothering you because I know you must have thousands of messages. Sally — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.219.17.53 (talk) 16:23, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Songs
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Songs. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins
Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:32, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

A new user right for New Page Patrollers
Hi.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins) .MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors December 2016 News
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Songs
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Songs. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Star Trek: Discovery
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Star Trek: Discovery. Legobot (talk) 04:33, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

HBC AIV helperbot11
Hi Darkwind. HBC AIV helperbot11 hasn't edited in well over a month now. Recently poor HBC AIV helperbot5 has been left to do all of the AIV/UAA work all by itself, and it seems to be having some trouble as well (Noticed there's a backlog of requests at UAA of users that have already been blocked). If you're able to, could you restart bot11 and get it running again? Thanks, — k6ka  <span title="Canadian!" style="color:red">🍁 ( Talk ·  Contributions ) 20:45, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I've been having a great deal of trouble logging in to Tool Labs, but I'll give it a try. –Darkwind (talk) 08:42, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Indus Valley Civilisation
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Indus Valley Civilisation. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter - February 2017
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news
 * A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
 * Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
 * Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.

Technical news
 * When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
 * Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
 * The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration
 * The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.

Obituaries
 * JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.

Discuss this newsletter • Subscribe • Archive

13:38, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:New York Daily News
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:New York Daily News. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

About Dominican DNA:
.. Mr. Darkwind. I've made several attempts to remove the new addition in reference to a dna portion made about Dominicans in the DR page, inly for it to be re-added and eventually leading to me being unable to make edits anymore. The reason I've made several attempts to erase it, is because of the bias info which contradicts findings from several other DNA studies. This study was conducted on 1000 people in certain towns in a few provinces within the DR with predominant afro influence. Studies done on 1,000 Dominican citizens from these towns do not represent the entire population of 10,000,000.

Here is some examples of other DNA studies done in DR with some links:

In the Last 2010 Dominican Census, Dominican marked themselves as follow...

59% Other(Mixes) 28% White 12% Black

According to C.I.A. Fact Book estimates Dominicans are:

73% Mix Tri-racial(Spanish ,Afro ,Native) 16% White( Spanish/Other European) 11% Black

According to recent genealogical tests by DNA-Tribe the average Mix Dominican is estimated to be:

58.1 % Spanish European 35.2% African 6.4% Taino Indio

http://i424.photobucket.com/albums/pp323/cristiano3/DNA-4.jpg

According to 23andMe DNA test, Mix Dominicans are estimated to be:

60% European 35% African 5% Taino Indian

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/lv?authkey=CL2T54EF&hl=en_US&key=0At1sp4m_NTCLdHB4a2FZYXRxZnh0UzRfbzlTV2lXSWc&type=view&gid=0&f=true&sortcolid=-1&sortasc=true&rowsperpage=250

According to PLOS Genetic the average Mix Dominican is:

57% Spanish European 38% Afro 5 % Native

http://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pgen.1003925

According to "History Of The Caribbean" book Pg. 34 written by Franklin W. Knight a extremely important Historian of the slavery in the Caribbean inform that by 1750 Dominicans were:

38,000 Whites 30,000 Mixed 15,000 Slaves

My point, is that DNA shouldn't even be used in this Wikipedia page about DR, because of all the conflicting findings and opinions. This is very divisive within our community and alienates a large portion of the population. Please remove this info, because it isn't a fact. Thank you very much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jpimentel201 (talk • contribs) 03:00, 19 July 2016‎ (UTC)