User talk:DarqaviPalladin

Talkback
Randykitty (talk) 09:01, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Эмануэль Филиберто Савойский, Принц Венеции


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Эмануэль Филиберто Савойский, Принц Венеции. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Emanuele Filiberto of Savoy, Prince of Venice. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Emanuele Filiberto of Savoy, Prince of Venice. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. RileyBugz 会話 投稿記録 16:10, 17 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Thank you for posting and deleting the article. I was just mistaken. I wanted to create a page in Russian and did not notice that I edited it in the English version of Wikipedia. --DarqaviPalladin (talk) 16:16, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Oh, I see. Also, I can't delete the article, since I'm not an admin. Anyways, good luck with the creation in Russian. RileyBugz 会話 投稿記録  16:25, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Thank you so much!--DarqaviPalladin (talk) 16:32, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Reply
Hi, thanks for message. Please add your messages to the bottom of the talk page, or they may be overlooked. If you post an article it will be assessed as it stands. If you don't want that to happen, you should write it as a draft. Please read Civility, and note that we are all volunteers, you can't expect an instant reply. I deleted your article because
 * it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to an organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance.
 * you gave some no references of any kind. There was a link at the bottom which went to a picture of a book. If you meant to give the book as a reference, give full details including authors, publisher and page number(s). This book appears to have a pdf so you should link to that instead of the picture. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls. Normally we would also expect more than one independent verifiable source to show notability.
 * It's difficult to see why this is notable. The text is completely unreferenced, and the only person listed with the name apparently isn't notable enough for to have a wikipedia article
 * it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. The collection of unsourced facts appears intended to promote the name, and examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: famous, sung in the old ceremonial songs... enlightener...
 * the article was created in a single edit without wikilinks or references, and looks as if was copied from an unknown and possibly copyrighted source. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. Note that a translation of copyright text is still a copyright violation.

The article is clearly not ready, but I'm prepared to restore it as a draft. Before I do so, you will need to make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, that you can find independent third party sources and that your text is not a copyright violation or a verbatim translation. Also read Your first article. If you wish me to proceed, let me know at the bottom of my talk page Jimfbleak - talk to me?  16:53, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
 * The other thing that occurs to me is that if you translated a Russian Wikipedia page, you should be aware that our rules are not necessarily the same as Russian Wikipedia, and are generally stricter. Translating a Russian Wikipedia page will not create a copyright issue unless the Russian page itself has its text copied from another source. Jimfbleak - talk to me?  17:12, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your further comments. Please sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~ . I note that you have translated the Russian Wikipedia article, although that only has one fact that is actually referenced, namely Урусбиев Асланбек Мырзакулович (1840-1897(8)) - Полковник русской императорской армии.[1]. that's probably why you ran into problems with the higher requirements here. However, you seem to have found some other sources. Note that your references don't have to be in English, although that's preferred. Do you want me to restore the text as a draft for you to improve? Jimfbleak - talk to me?  11:14, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Restored at Draft:Urusbiy, I've cleaned it up a bit Jimfbleak - talk to me?  16:53, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

April 2019
Hello, I'm Notimelivelong. I noticed that you recently removed content from Kislovodsk without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Notimelivelong (talk) 23:34, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Hello, I have received your reply! I responded to it on my talk page. --Notimelivelong (talk) 02:54, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The House of Duda


The article The House of Duda has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No indication of significance/secondary sources."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 17jiangz1 (talk) 04:35, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Category:Karachay-Balkar aristocracy has been nominated for merging
Category:Karachay-Balkar aristocracy has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:13, 2 April 2023 (UTC)