User talk:Darr320/Linguistic Injustice: Education

Peer Review

 * The organization is somewhat hard to follow. The article can be long winded. The language barrier section could be split up.
 * The article reads like an essay with references seemingly used to convince rather than provide an accurate overview of the scholarship surrounding the topic. For example, the use of the word "Forced" in the beginning of the article gives the impression of an argument.
 * Some of the information feels redundant. If this is going on the linguistic justice article, I don't know if the lead section is necessary.
 * The sources are abundant and very strong. ECappBU (talk) 03:44, 3 May 2023 (UTC)