User talk:Darren23/Archive 3

For Future use only

Thanks!
Thanks for reverting vandalism on my talk page. Happy editing! -- A3RO (mailbox)  21:46, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Fred
Not having it on GTWO does not mean it dissipated, only meaning no chance of redevelopment, check out any surface analysis that includ the area just east of Florida, there is a 1017mb low, and thats the remnants of Fred. HurricaneSpin Talk My contributions 02:09, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

WPTC Assessment
Hi! Since you have recently posted to WT:WPTC or otherwise been involved with tropical cyclone articles, please nominate and review pages at WikiProject Tropical cyclones/Assessment so we can revive this process. Thanks in advance, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 14:21, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Please review History of the flags of Romania
Hi, Darren23. If you have time, please review History of the Flags of Romania. Thanks. Secret Saturdays (talk) 00:31, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Super Typhoon Melor
Oh! sorry. But I'd already said in the history that "if there is something a wrong grammar, please just correct it". But no worries, I will correct it. And also thanks for informing me that Cyclonebiskit is now doing a main article of Melor.Cheers!..have fun..Jpuligan_12 (talk) 4 October 2009, 16:54 (UTC)


 * If you are around can you determine the landfall location of Parma ASAP and leave me a note on my talkpage. Thanks Jason Rees (talk) 13:36, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Re: Signature
Thanks so much for the info, ive been typing it out for so long and it really has been a pain >.<. Knowledgekid87 (talk) 15:48, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Re
i RVd myself because i knew one of the Storms was 130kts and was fairly certain that it was Ike. As for the landfalls Bug me later when i get on IRC (around 1700UTC) to check the JMA and PAGASA postions against google earth and work it out from there (dont you already have Parmas?.Jason Rees (talk) 09:39, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 October 2009

 * From the editor: Perspectives from other projects
 * Special story: Memorial and Collaboration
 * Bing search: Bing launches Wikipedia search
 * News and notes: New WMF hire, new stats, and more
 * Wikipedia in the news: IOC sues over Creative Commons license, Wikipedia at Yale, and more
 * Dispatches: Sounds
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
 * WikiProject report: WikiProject Tropical cyclones
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 03:45, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

IRC
If youre around come online - ive got something to make you smile.Jason Rees (talk) 20:05, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 October 2009
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:52, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
 * News and notes: WikiReader, Meetup in Pakistan, Audit committee elections, and more
 * In the news: Sanger controversy reignited, Limbaugh libelled, and more
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Editor review archived
Since it has been well over 30 days since you requested to be reviewed, I've gone ahead and archived your request as part of my effort to cleanup Editor Review. You may view your review here. Thanks & happy editing. If you have any questions, please message me on my talk page. =D Netalarm   talk  05:17, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

Your message
Hi Darren23 (sorry for the late reply). I give you permission to delete Requests for adminship/Secret Saturdays. Cheers! :^3D Secret Saturdays (talk) 23:43, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 October 2009
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:00, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Interview: Interview with John Blossom
 * News and notes: New hires, German Wikipedian dies, new book tool, and more
 * In the news: Editor profiled in Washington Post, Wikia magazines, and more
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Re: invite
Hey im sorry it took a bit to reply, I had noticed your invite sent to me for the Tropical cyclones WikiProject. Id love to join but I dont know how active I can be, I am in college and just get on wiki to help when I have time. You think I should sign up anyways and help when I can? - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 20:10, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

My turn
Thank you for the invitation to your project. Now I noticed that you seem to have an liking for cyclones for stuff so I am inviting you to join the simple english version of Wikipedia and expand on this article. http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyclone Now the procedure to join is just the same as the english Wikipedia and just as simple. Enjoy! Jhenderson777 (talk) 21:30, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 November 2009
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 04:18, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 November 2009
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:07, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 16 November 2009
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 15:31, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 23 November 2009
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 12:30, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

2010 AHS
You were saying we could collaborate on your sandbox. I got one thing we could add. We could added a navigation template like this:

I would recommend not making the template till we actually create an article for the 2010 AHS. Previously I made a template like this, however it was deleted because there were no linked articles.

Thank You --12george1 (talk) 01:55, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 30 November 2009
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 13:07, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 December 2009
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 05:12, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 December 2009
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 15:30, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 December 2009
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:46, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

"Appeal"
Hi!

Thanks for notifying me of your revert. However, my edit that you reverted was not unconstructive and did contain an informative edit summary. I suppose you thought I had deleted a large chunk of text as vandals sometimes do, but if you look at the edit carefully, you'll notice that this is not the case.

Best, --91.148.159.4 (talk) 20:49, 25 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks! Happy holidays to you, too!--91.148.159.4 (talk) 21:38, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

Re:Favour
Done: User:Darren23/Forecasts. Jason Rees (talk) 10:49, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Alma's article
Hey, I was browsing around, and I tried to fix there not being a red link on the top of the page. I copied the info from another article, I think the next storm in the season, but there's still a red link. Could you help me out? Viennaiswaiting (talk) 22:26, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for fixing the talk page for Alma. That article confuses me though. It seems most of the other articles in the project are really complete. How can I get Alma to look as good as Hurricane Able (1951) (hope I did that right) or Cyclone Orson (from another part of the world, but still a nice article)? I tried doing a google search, but I didn't find much, and I want to make this my project. --Viennaiswaiting (talk) 01:53, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Hey, could you take a look at my article - Hurricane Alma (1970)? I've really learned a lot over the past few days, and I just tried to make it like the other hurricane articles. Is there anything more I should do with that? --Viennaiswaiting (talk) 05:31, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks...
..for reverting my user page. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 15:49, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 December 2009
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:06, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Hi there!
hey there Darren, haven't heard from you for a while. how's it been going lately? i think i'm really getting the hang of this article writing!yo, check out some of my articles. Tropical Storm Alice (1953) Tropical Storm Arlene (1981) Subtropical Storm Alpha (1972)

peace out. --Viennaiswaiting (talk) 01:29, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 January 2010
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 23:01, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 11 January 2010
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 08:22, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 18 January 2010
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 14:25, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

sorry :(
sorry to see you go! back when i started you really helped me out. take it easy bud --Viennaiswaiting (talk) 02:33, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 25 January 2010
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 03:35, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 February 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 20:57, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 February 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:22, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 February 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 12:41, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 February 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 11:42, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #29
JCbot (talk) 14:11, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Keep an eye on who's editing the page.
If the page gets blanked and they created it, it's the equivalent of saying "I quit" and you should tag it with instead of reverting and warning. Removing a db tag is one thing, completely blanking it is another. Half Shadow  22:50, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I see that happen from time to time. Doesn't seem fair to slap them with a warning in blanking cases. Half  Shadow  22:57, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

IRC
i dont know what you're plans are but can u come on IRC soon please.Jason Rees (talk) 21:41, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Re: Please
But how is it possible, how can the storm make landfall in japan when it is miles, miles and miles away from it?????Anirudh Emani (talk) 13:52, 14 August 2010 (UTC)


 * oops! sry!Anirudh Emani (talk) 13:58, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

Davorak
Since you were wondering about T Number online i thought id post this table here of how it stacks up. This was taken from our article on the Davorak TechniqueJason Rees (talk) 01:28, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Use of convert template
Hi,

Can you point to a community accepted guideline for me that prohibits the use of the convert template? There are community accepted guidelines for units and it is called the Manual of Style - Numbers. My edits are in accordance with those guidelines. Please review others edits carefully before blindly reverting - especially after this has been emphasised in the edit summary. Bleakcomb (talk) 23:53, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your response. A couple of things. My original edit included a correction to the blunder 35 mph (55 mph). Yellow Evan blindly restored this error in his fevered attempt to rid the article of the scourge of the convert template. Hence my request to actually read others edits before blindly reverting. Another editor then attempted to correct the mph error with kph. kph is not the international and MOSNUM accepted abbreviation for kilometres per hour. I remade my edits to correct this. The great benefit of the convert template is that it allows a good chance that the text it creates will be in accordance with MOSNUM and international guidelines. It is not perfect, but its use greatly improves the accuracy and conformity of text related to the conversion of units on Wikipedia. If you want to ban it you need to raise the issue in a wider forum than a Wikiproject. Also blindly reverting constructive edits from an editor who is not a member of an associated Wikiproject or a familiar editor smacks of ownership. I trust this is not the case. If editors don't understand how to use the convert template, rather than just revert edits that contain it why not ask for help in using or understanding it?

On the subject of conversions given by NHC; I am wondering how this is relevant. For example, the cited source (NHC) for the windspeed is given in knots. There are no conversions given in that source. Even if there were, why should we follow the practices of an external organistation? Wikipedia has its own guidelines and consensus for accuracy of conversions, which my edits will generally follow. I note that the convert template has been modified to implement the rather unusual rounding algorithms requested by the storm watching community on Wikipedia. I don't necessarily agree with these changes, though as a concession I used this new, optional, rounding-to-nearest-5 algorithm in my first edit. Even this was not enough to satisfy the firmly held beliefs of the owners of the article. Further, as I said, the source gave the windspeed in knots. The article text for the windspeed was given in miles per hour with a conversion to kilometres per hour. Given the slightly cryptic layout of the source, the article text was hard to verify. Given that knots are not widely used any more, a conversion factor to mph in the citation text or converting directly from knots to km/h, as my edits did, would be clearer.

Additionally, there is no need to give atmospheric pressures in both mbar and hPa; given that they have the same value. Hectopascals would suffice with a conversion to inches of mercury, if required. Again, my edits reflect this.

Lastly, the MOS is a guideline only. It is not a rule. The consensus is however that the guidelines can be followed unless there are good reasons not to. I still can't see why using a template to avoid basic errors and to conform to MOS consensus could be overruled by an undocumented project guideline.

I note more responses on my talk page. I will make further responses there. Thanks. Bleakcomb (talk) 02:22, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Concerning User:Vladwin
User:Vladwin made another non-constructive edit to the 2010 Atlantic hurricane season page. He increased the wind speeds of Igor and he added that there's a 8 pm advisory for Igor but I reverted it. In fact, there's no 8 pm advisory for Igor. Does this count as vandalism because I've looked into his talk page and saw a block notice. <b style="color:black;">Irfan</b><b style="color:grey;">Faiz</b> 00:53, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry for jumping in, but it is not consider vandalism, in fact it was correct! Check here. YE  Tropical   Cyclone  00:56, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Next time, before blindly reverting YE, check the consensus!  Darren 23 Edits 00:57, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I did not blindy revert as no consensus has been reached. Soem people were for and against it. YE  Tropical   Cyclone  01:01, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Read the discussion. There was general agreement (if not unanimous) that RBT's cannot be used in updating.  Darren 23 Edits 01:27, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Yeah...
That anonymous editor (24.116.95.58) in 2010 Atlantic Hurricane Season won't stop. I'm pretty sure what he's doing is considered vandalism, so...--Hylian Auree (talk) 23:03, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Nicole Damage
Thanks so much for fixing that; I hope it wasn't too much trouble. Big fail on my part, haha. XD -- Hylian Auree (talk) 01:02, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

igor post-storm analysis
The post-storm analysis saysa that Igor was reached category 5 status. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Khaled98 (talk • contribs) 14:58, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Don't just say it did, provide a source!  Darren 23 Edits 15:00, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Achieving the impossible
After you left i managed to get YE to shut up about BI!!!!Jason Rees (talk) 02:17, 19 October 2010 (UTC)


 * What is so impossible about that? You did it! YE  Tropical   Cyclone  02:33, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

YE it was a Sarcastic title.Jason Rees (talk) 02:35, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I know. Just having fun. YE  Tropical   Cyclone  02:58, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

The WikiProject Tropical Cyclones Newsletter#32B
--Anirudh Emani (talk) 10:13, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

90L
Good call. Hurricanehink ( talk ) 17:46, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Hurricane Alex
What are Hurricane Alex (2010)'s winds? <B> Περσεύς &#124; </B> <B> Talk to me </B> 19:54, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

IRC
Come on please as i have something to show you.Jason Rees (talk) 21:38, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

/* Hurricane Igor */
Sorry for changing the page. I am very intrested in hurricanes and those things, and I study them a lot. I heard from one of my friends that Igor was indeed a category 5 hurricane for a brief time, so I thought he had 160mph winds. I went on Wikipedia and saw that it said he only had 155mph, so I changed it because I thought it was wrong. I still think he was a cat.5, because the official winds a hurricane needs to have to be classified as a cat.5 is 156mph, so Igor's winds could have easily went up 1mph before he started weakening. I think they should either scale the winds by their real record(154mph,132mph), or downgrade the scale to 155mph and up is category 5. You can either agree with me, or disagree. I won't change the page anymore, but I won't change the fact that I think Igor was a category 5. This is kind of like what I've seen with hurricane Emily. Lots of places that I've been to on the internet say she was only a category 4 hurricane, but Wikipedia says she was a 5. Same thing with Hurricane Igor, only vice-versa. Many people say he was a 5, and some say he wasn't. And also, what happened with Hurricane Richard? I heard he was a category 1 hurricane with 90mph, but now Wikipedia says he was a category 2 with 100mph. Who changed it? Why can't it say that Igor was a category 5, when clearly he was? Just like it says on hurricane Vince's article, "If it looks like a hurricane, it probably is". Now look at hurricane Igor's picture.Ask yourself this: What does he look like, a category 4 hurricane, or a category 5 hurricane? And the eye? Wow! It looks like a category 5's eye to me! So if it looks like a category 5 hurricane, it probably is! Not being rude here, but I think Igor was a category 5 hurricane, and so do many others. Look at the intensity reports from hurricane Igor. They probably say 155mph winds in estimation, but what do they say without estimation? 156mph&157mph will estimate to 155. The Saffir-Simpson wind scale says category 5 is 156mph and up. If Igor's reports say 156mph 0r 157mph, then he was a category 5, no questions. There are hundreds of things that can prove Igor was a category 5 hurricane, and I can go on and on listing them, but I don't have the time to continue on, so thank you. Take in what I said about hurricane Igor please!

Ryder Busby —Preceding Signatures comment added by 69.68.113.201 (talk) 22:33, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

/* 2010 Atlantic hurricane season conflict */
Hello. Remember me? I'm the one from "2010 Atlantic hurricane season conflict". Well, I'm a member here now, since November 27. I'm not being impatient, but have those hurricane reports you were talking about come in yet? If they haven't, then when will they? Again, not being impatient, I'm just wondering. Thanks!--Ryder Busby (talk) 01:28, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

As you know, the National Hurricane Center is a very busy organization, even off season. So, it is going to take a while for all of them to come in. The ones available right now are: Tropical Depression 2, Tropical Storm Colin, Tropical Depression 5, Tropical Storm Fiona, Tropical Storm Hermine, Hurricane Lisa, and Hurricane Otto.

Some of the storms like Igor may not be out until the late Winter/early Spring of next year (January-April 2011). As I said above, the NHC is a very busy organization. Here is a link to keep track of them: Tropical Cyclone Reports. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 03:59, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Hey, is anyone going to write an article on Hurricane Lisa, because if not, I'd be happy to.--Ryder Busby (talk) 03:05, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Hurricane Season Buttons
Hey, I was wondering how to edit the hurricane season buttons. I'm not going to change any of them, I just want to make it where Hurricane Lisa's button goes to Hurricane Lisa (2010) article. Thanks,--Ryder Busby (talk) 03:06, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Merry Christmas
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:red; background-color:fff; border-width:5px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">

And behold, he shall be born of Mary, at Jerusalem which is the land of our forefathers, she being a virgin, a precious and chosen vessel, who shall be overshadowed and conceive by the power of the Holy Ghost, and bring forth a son, yea, even the Son of God.

YE  Tropical   Cyclone  is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding to their talk page with a friendly message. Merry Christmas, Darren. YE  Tropical   Cyclone  23:40, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Ma-on infobox
How does the infobox not work? Right now it's showing the JTWC data, since JTWC uses 1-min which works for the SSHS. There should very much be the information at the top of the article with the latest storm information. That could only work with the current infobox. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 18:30, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Doesn't it also need to show JMA data? I've tried tinkering with the active template for quite some time now and I still haven't gotten it to work for all the basins. Plus, I don't think we ever use that template outside C/EPAC and ATL articles. Darren 23 Edits 18:33, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't think it absolutely needs to. If you think about it, people who might be reading the article in the coming days would be English-speaking tourists who would be more used to 1-min winds. People in Japan, who are used to 10-min and JMA, would be reading the Japanese article. And I don't think that's being small-minded or anything. I do think it'd be useful to have 1-min winds in the infobox. And yes, we have used the template outside of NOAA basins. It has been used regularly in the NIO, for example. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 18:40, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Regularly? It wasn't used completely last year when a storm was active and it had an article. I am fairly sure it wasn't used in WPAC either. And we can't just leave out stuff because "they're not reading this.".  Darren 23 Edits 18:49, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Alright, I was mistaken about NIO. However, what's wrong with using the current one? It provides an immediate indication where the storm is and how strong it is. If we do it in the Atlantic and EPAC, I don't see why we don't outside the basin. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 18:57, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, here's a proposal. How about only use RSMC data, without JTWC data. That solves the issue of having to have both in the same template, which is my main issue with it.  Darren 23 Edits 19:01, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Actually, looking at it again, I agree with you how it should only use the main infobox. It's not Wikipedia's job to keep people informed what is happening. If they know about the storm, Wikipedia isn't going to be able to help. It shouldn't be presented from any other disaster, even though it happens to be current. --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 22:08, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

IRC
You should really come on at times.Jason Rees (talk) 00:52, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay, I'm going on tonight.  Darren 23 Edits 01:04, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Re: Favors
I think I understand your first request, basically if I put in a particular wind speed, the template will automatically know to display typhoon or STS or what ever it may be. I will look to see what I can do on that one. For the second part, are you refering to updating ? --Holderca1talk 00:38, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

re:Carelessness
What exactly, is the use of infobox current when it doesnt have CSI!?? --Anirudh Emani (talk) 09:08, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

Scales
A few months ago you converted the various TC scales in to small templates, where did you plonk them? Jason Rees (talk) 00:52, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

Tell me more
Could you please try explaining me, what exactly is wrong with Typhoon Nanmadol (2011) so that i can try to fix it. You see, im the one who made the article and want to solve the problem without troubling anyone else. --Anirudh Emani (talk) 14:11, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Irrelevant picture
I would say irrelevant to who?

I was a pilot who flew into Hurricane Hugo during Operation Hawkeye (President Bush ordered federal forces to St. Croix to suppress the violence, protect property, and restore law and order. Elements of the Army, Navy and the Coast Guard, along with a contingent from the U.S. Marshals Service and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) formed Joint Task Force (JTF) 40 for Operation Hawkeye.)and I think its very relevant showing how the Hurricane may have been well over hyped by the media calling 100+ winds. More so when you put it with the buoy data that showed the highest gust at 60 in NC and the Hurricane Hunter Vortex data. It all back's each other up.

Someone may find it relevant — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.101.66.207 (talk) 04:37, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

Really?
Well, excuse me for asking a question..I won't do it again :| TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 23:31, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Cookie
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">

TropicalAnalystwx13 has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Come visit IRC soon! TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 01:16, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

New deal for page patrollers
Hi ,

In order to better control the quality  of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:IMD Scale small
Template:IMD Scale small has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 15:08, 22 May 2017 (UTC)