User talk:Darrenhusted/archive 9

Sorry man
Sorry man i was just trying to mention that Vince and Stephaine are Co GMs of Raw i didnt know if it was offical yet —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sdegner (talk • contribs) 13:33, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Re; Dark Knight reverts
Please review WP:BRD, which notes how consensus is created. Additionally, realize that you are coming off a wee bit unpleasant in your edit summary. When you reverted the first time, and it was undone, you might have found the temperature of the discussion a little less hot had you opened a discussion page section yourself. As such has also taken place in the Joker article (1) and subsequently reverted, I feel it might be fair to suggest that you need to following your own advice somewhat, and discussing your removal of the info. To date, you have not. I am not going to discuss the merits of the addition, but wanted to point out that being confrontational benefits no one. Leave the well-cited addition be, and participate in the discussion as to the merits. etc. of the added info. - Arcayne   (cast a spell)  17:50, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Problem is you didn't discuss putting that section in, you added it then pointed out the talk page after I removed it, however as there was no discussion about that edit on the talk page your comment "again - revert unexplained removal - look over yonder, it's a disucssion page: ain't it amazing?" is actually more dick-ish than any valid edit that I did. Darrenhusted (talk) 09:06, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Talk:Joker (comics)
As an editor who agreed with removing the Dendermonde attack from the Joker article, your input on the talk page would be appreciated. There is a conflict with one editor who continues to insist on inclusion, and has chosen over multiple days to ignore your actions as a sign of consensus. Further thoughts would go a long way to helping, perhaps. ThuranX (talk) 00:20, 3 February 2009 (UTC)