User talk:Darth Stabro

PUCPR
I've reverted your edit HERE for removal of cited material. To avoid other editors' reverting your edits, in the future simply add your contribution to the article without removing other contributors cited contributions. Mercy11 (talk) 07:44, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Betancourt Motto
Hi, I found it on the Archdiocese website along with his Coat of Arms. It's on the invite to attend the consecration: https://archdioceseofhartford.org/an-invitation-to-the-episcopal-ordination/

Roberto221 (talk) 17:09, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Aloysius R. Callaghan
Thanks for your work on Aloysius R. Callaghan.

I just reviewed the page, and tagged it as having some issues to fix, including this note for you:

"The article looks like a good start, but it needs more references. The final paragraph of the Biography section currently contains zero references."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

paul2520 (talk) 13:44, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Not admin topicon
Template:Not admin topicon has been nominated for merging with Template:Not an admin topicon. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Interstellarity (talk) 22:53, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Convertfile.png


The file File:Convertfile.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Contact Form.png


The file File:Contact Form.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Loras College Logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Loras College Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:VandalSprayCan.png


The file File:VandalSprayCan.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Archdiocese SPM SVG BW.svg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Archdiocese SPM SVG BW.svg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jonteemil (talk) 21:33, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Special:WantedTemplates
Hi, I have been helping with an effort to clear up false-positives in Special:WantedTemplates and found that 10 of the entries can be traced back to User:Darth Stabro/monobook.js. For example, if you check Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:" + "db-attack, you will see that the server is reporting that User:Darth Stabro/monobook.js is transcluding that template. Clearly this is a quirk in how the backend software parses javascript pages, but it makes it harder to find the real problem pages. It would be great if you could put // at the bottom of the script page. Since these are commented out, it won't break the javascript, but it will prevent the backend software from parsing the  as a template transclusion. Alternatively, if you are no longer using the monobook skin, I can delete the page for you (most editors are now using vector). Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 22:19, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:NorthHennepin.svg
Thanks for uploading File:NorthHennepin.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:10, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Doug Mahnke
Hi. Please do not add uncited material to articles, as you did with this edit to Doug Mahnke, as this violates Wikipedia's Verifiability policy. I know you don't edit here that often, but since you've accumulated over 2,100 edits since November 2009, you should be made aware by now that Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here. If you'd like to discuss this further, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 20:37, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:FlagOfFrance.svg


The file File:FlagOfFrance.svg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Redundant to c:File:Flag of France.svg"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 04:52, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:RecentUpdates
Template:RecentUpdates has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:12, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for merger of Template:Not admin topicon
Template:Not admin topicon has been nominated for merging with Template:Not an admin topicon. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Natsuikomin (talk) 06:13, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Saint Paul and Minneapolis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harry Flynn. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 25
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Coon Rapids Dam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Army Corps of Engineers.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:46, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Coon Rapids Dam For DYK
If you haven't planned to already, I'd like to put Coon Rapids Dam up for DYK (furthest navigable point on the Mississippi isn't something to sneeze at). I can perform the nom and requisite quid-pro-quo but you can claim the credit for what's shaped up as a solid article. Let me know if this sounds good and I'll get right to it when I have a spare 15 minutes tomorrow. ~ Pbritti (talk) 02:31, 26 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Sounds good! ~Darth StabroTalk/Contribs 02:55, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
 * One thing that may be important in phrasing - technically one can't navigate further north than the Upper Saint Anthony Falls Lock and Dam because the lock is permanently closed to prevent Asian carp from spreading further upstream. ~Darth StabroTalk/Contribs 14:53, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Coon Rapids Dam
Complex / Rational 00:02, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

MOS:ORDER
Thank you for your nice article on Coon Rapids Dam. If I may offer just one suggestion, it is to follow the MOS:SECTIONORDER guideline regarding the Coord template. It seems that certain mobile operating systems can't handle the Coord template being near the top of the article, which is why MOS:SECTIONORDER wants it placed either in the Infobox, or just above the Categories at the bottom of the page. Thanks, Abductive  (reasoning) 20:31, 20 July 2024 (UTC)