User talk:Darthgriz98/Archive 4

Re: Biting
Yeah sorry. I lost my cool. The anti-gay stuff that's going down in the billie joe and gerard way articles is getting to me. I just just take a step back and take a breather I think. Thanks for the warning, though, I probably would have forgotten about it and gotten in huge trouble.--Jude 04:02, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Fair Use Image
If I create a new image based on a 2-dimensional work of art such as by scanning, photographing, etc. the new image I created is called a "derivative work of art" and has the exact same copyright protection as the original. So, if GSUSA claims copyright of the design of the Silver Award, then a photo or scan of the award is also copyrighted. We have developed the Scoutlogo template to make it easy to tag 2-dimensional Scouting images that are copyright protected. This template notes that while these images are copyrighted, they may be used under the "fair use" principle in certain circumstances. Generally, fair use limits the display of "Scout logos" to directly relevant articles where the image illustrates a key point. This does not include user pages or templates. Note that I am not the image Nazi, hence I left your image there, but I do encourage people to be responsible to avoid attracting attention by the image Nazis. Does this help? --NThurston 14:52, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I tend to be fairly passive in my image behavior. If I notice something like this amiss, I fix it, but I'm not out patrolling for stuff.  Sorry it took so long.  A minor skirmish happened with the image used in User eagle scout.  The eventual solution was for me to "draw" my own version of the eagle knot.  You can do the same, but there is some question about whether an exact replicate, even if hand-drawn, makes it a derivative work.  You might want to review the history of the eagle template and image inclusion before you get too much effort into it.  If I can help in some way, let me know. --NThurston 14:58, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I'd be glad to take a look at anything. Also, I can help create or edit the image if you want.  Let me know. --NThurston 15:02, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Let me take a first crack at the Silver Award. I'll keep you posted. --NThurston 15:32, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Please take a look at Image:GSUSASilverAward.jpg. It's just a first attempt. Let me know if you want me to change colors, etc. I am trying to figure out how to save as svg which will make a much neater presentation. --NThurston 16:10, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Here are examples using .svg versions of free use images:

--NThurston 19:00, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Vandal + barnstar
Sorry to butt in on this but I came across the case of vandalism while looking at WP:AIV. I think that you are letting teh vandals win by removing the picture! (just my two cents). By the way, here is an award for handelign the situation well-- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 15:15, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * No problem! I personally think more wikipedians need to have each others backs. I have many many fellow editors on my watch list (and you are now on the list) that I scan for vandalism!  Its ok, i know how it feels, my page has been vandalized over 40 times.  One of my favorites can be found at the top of my User talk page!  Keep up the great work and dont get too discouraged. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 15:20, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Speaking of watchlists, interestingly I only have your pages watchlisted because I posted here about a fairuse image you used in greetings for International Talk Like a Pirate Day back in September. Heh. – Chacor 15:21, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Re: Help
Well, account creation on the original account (at least, what looks like the original account) is disabled, so there shouldn't be any new socks. If you get more vandalism, feel free to report them at WP:AIV, and if there are a lot of them, I'd post to WP:ANI. --Core desat  23:34, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Semiprotection
Hi Darthgriz. I saw your note on AN/I and semi-protected both your user and user talk pages (expiring in a week). Please let me know if you would like me to un-protect one or both of them. I didn't see any recent anon edits on your talk page going back to 2006, so probably semiprotection will not have any effect on valid comments left there. Happy editing, Antandrus (talk) 18:10, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * If you need anything from me regarding this as well, please feel free to let me know. I am watching your page and reverting/blocking vandals who attack!  Keep up your great work, it is much appreciated. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 18:11, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * not that I am aware of. If it is someboy you suspect, somebody with checkuser can view the ip but I am not sure there is much that can be done.  I am sure they will get tired of being blocked because as soon as they do anything they are usually indef blocked. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 18:32, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I've watchlisted this page as well, and would be glad to help with filing a checkuser report if needed. Newyorkbrad 23:44, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Don't know whether this helps, but you're on my watchlist too, now. Like Chris said, we should watch each others' backs. I'm on UK time so at least I can watch the "wee-hours" when you Americans are asleep! ;) Bubba hotep 21:25, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Re: Adam Lazzara
Yes, idk wat u or other ppl think, but Adam Lazzara does suffer from brain cancer. I'm looking for the article where I found it now. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Avafanman301 (talk • contribs) 04:48, 4 February 2007 (UTC).

Garion96's RFA
Thank you for your support in my request for adminship which closed successfully last night. I would also like to encourage you to vote often (just in case you don't) on other candidates since we need more admins. Happy editing, Garion96 (talk) 00:18, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Reply to deletion of changes in "Jabba the Hutt'
Excuse me! I'm sorry if the truths of my changes conflict with your opinions on this article. If there is something that I wrote that you did not understand, I will be happy to explain my reasons. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jthminion (talk • contribs) 02:46, 15 February 2007 (UTC).

New Article?
I don't know if you have any clue how to do this, but if you want to create a new article, where do you go and what do you do? I've looked around but can't figure out how. MusicGirl21 22:14, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
 * That helped! Thanks! MusicGirl21 23:44, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Rock music invitation
Hello WikiProject Alternative music member. WikiProject Alternative music, in my eyes, has proved to be successful "improving the encyclopaedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock", and improving their quality as well. One specific example I have witnessed is The Smashing Pumpkins article. The page has gone from a mediocre work, to GA status, to FA nomination. Only appropriate, as the Pumpkins are undeniably one of the most influential alternative rock bands on the 1990's and beyond. This is the stuff I wish to achieve with the somewhat recently ressurected WikiProject Rock music. I hope to also attract attention to rock music articles of all sorts, and hopefully change some to GA or FA status. I invite you to come join us, and not only be a member of alternative Wikipedians, but the rockin' ones as well. Rock on. -- Reaper  X  03:21, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

IP blocked
I've blocked the anonymous editor who was harassing you. Unfortunately, we can't block IPs indefinitely because ISPs sometimes shift them, but please let me know if there is any recurrence of the harassment following the block. Regards, Newyorkbrad 04:45, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Semi-protection
I've semi-protected your user page for two weeks. Hopefully this will stop the vandalism. --Core desat  18:35, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Okay, then, I've unprotected it for now. Sorry about that. :) --Core desat  18:46, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
 * gotta let you know that I caught the vandal and blocked them immediatly! You have alot of people watching your page! It means you are doing a great job and your work is much aprpeciated so keep up the excellent work! -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 18:48, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

NOT COOL
hey man, why do you keep deleting my edits to the manatee??? Do you have something about the manatee song...please tell me how this would take away from the page.

Berkeleykid :-( —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Berkeleykid16 (talk • contribs) 00:54, 22 February 2007 (UTC).

Is this users actions allowed?

 * Hey there (:O) ... we have an ongoing debate over here on the status of an article. Now the thing I wanted to bring up was the editing and removal and well forceful rhetoric stating the result of the debate before it has even been decided.  The one causing all this is User:Ideogram.  I have tried so hard to be loving and understanding during this debate, but now I dont know if what the user is doing is right or wrong.  I dont know who to go to, so I figure I may ask someone who is  very familiar with the wikipedia world and how this should be dealt with maybe? Not sure. Please help. (:O) ---nima baghaei (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

My RfA
My request for adminship has closed successfully (79/0/1), so it appears that I am now an administrator. Thanks very much for your vote of confidence. If there's anything I can ever do to help, please don't hesitate to let me know. IrishGuy talk 03:13, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

RfA thanks
Hi, Darthgriz98, I just wanted to thank you for your support on my RfA, which was successful with a final tally of 61/0/2. I'm honored that you considered me worthy of the tools and hope my conduct as an administrator will justify that trust. If you have any comments about my use of the tools I would be glad to hear from you on my talk page. Thanks again! Heimstern Läufer 09:07, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thank you for supporting my RfA. It was (47/0/0) upon closure and now phase I is complete. I think the tools will aid both me and the encyclopedia. Feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, or if you think I'm misbehaving I'm always open to recall. Thanks, James086 Talk  12:58, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Rlevse Rfa
Thanks for the rfa support. Glad you are a part of the Scouting project and look forward to long happy wiki editing with you. PS: Please check out the Wood Badge FAC, it's gotten very little attention. Rlevse 03:41, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for spam cleanup
Thanks for cleaning up the linkspam from Trumpet. I'm not sure that many of the links on Jazz belong there either, BTW. - Special-T 12:26, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Kotor2
Ok I'm sorry for that. MM 13:53, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for your support on my RfA. It passed with 55/0/0. I'll try my best to be worthy of the trust the community has put in me. If there are any of my actions you have a problem with or a question about, please feel free to discuss this with me and if needed to revert me. If there is anything else I can help you with (backlogs, comments, ...), you can always contact me on my talk page. Fram 14:58, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Another RfA thanks!
Hi, Griz. Just a quick note to say thanks for your support at my RfA. A great turnout and a humbling level of support! Thanks very much. Bubba hotep 09:14, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Only Warning?
User:24.116.14.38 had made only one edit, ever, and you respond with a uw-vandalism4im? Isn't that drastic, and rather frowned upon over at WP:AIV? It also seems counterproductive to issue a threat that you know isn't going to be carried through; which admin do you think is going to actually block an IP after just two incidents? -- Zsero 23:18, 6 March 2007 (UTC)


 * If a first-time vandal is going to be deterred by a warning, they'll be deterred by test, uw-vandalism1, or uw-vandalism2, whichever seems more appropriate. And starting from there builds a record in the event that they are not deterred, and you have to take it to WP:AIV.  Don't want the admins there grousing because you didn't Assume Good Faith ("maybe they thought it was made out of poop and penises").  They're reluctant enough to act against IP vandals who aren't actively vandalising right at the very moment you file the report.  Zsero 00:33, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't have reported them to AIV for a first time warning or blocked them had I been an administrator acting on it, but I highly doubt the user thought the subject of the article was made of poop or penises. But for future situations I will go back to issuing lower warnings first. Unless the user is a repeat vandal and has been reverted many times but with no warning, then the user does need a test4. Someone who is vandalizing Wikipedia the way that user was only should have one warning before they are blocked for doing it again, many vandals know they will get multiple warnings and take advantage of it.  Darth  griz 98 00:39, 7 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Maybe they "should have only one warning", but you and I know that that's not what's going to happen. Unless you are an admin, able to block them on their second strike, the only way to get them blocked is to report them to AIV.  And getting an IP vandal blocked at AIV is mostly a waste of effort, unless they're active right at this moment.  It's certainly a waste of effort if you started with a 4im warning, to a brand-new editor with no history of vandalism.  --  Zsero 03:21, 7 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Not necessarily, it all depends. I blocked several IPs today for vandalism. You two are starting to go around in circles.Rlevse 03:24, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Good to hear it. Were they "actively" vandalising, i.e. doing it right at that moment?  Had they received a series of escalating warnings?  If the answer to both of those is "no", and you blocked them anyway, aren't you concerned that the IP might be used by more than one person, and you'll be scaring away a potential valuable contributor to WP?  Those are the arguments that the admins at AIV keep on making. Oh, and they keep reminding people that "blocking is a preventive measure, not a punishment", so if there's no vandalism going on right at this moment there's nothing to prevent.  In any case, if you are prepared to block IPs that house blatant vandals, maybe I should refer reports to you instead of to AIV.  How about it?  Next time I issue a "final warning", and the IP vandalises again, shall I just drop you a note?  Zsero 03:31, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I can understand the non-admin rationale that Zsero is stating; AIV admins seem to prefer the five warning system, so a one warning (while completely fine in a lot of blatant vandal situations) might become an empty threat. &mdash; Deckiller 03:26, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I agree with the point that some AIV admins need too many warnings to block a vandal, but every time I report one, I have never had a problem even after just two or three vandalisms and two warnings. Vandals just don't deserve the many warnings that some think they do.  Darth griz 98 03:42, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * And every time someone makes that point, it gets countered with "How do you know it's the same person? How do you know this vandal saw the warning you left for the last one? Maybe there are a series of vandals at this IP, each of whom only offends once. And maybe if we leave it unblocked, one day a useful contributor will emerge from that same IP; we wouldn't want to deter that person."  See the Talk page for AIV (and the archives) for more. Zsero 03:52, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * What I would say about that is if they want to contribute they need to make a user page and most IP addresses should only be given soft blocks. But if somebody is being horribly disruptive on Wikipedia or making personal attacks they need to have some sort of soft block to prevent further damage.  They also worry about things being too punitive over there, which is understandable but there is a line between new user experimenting and people that have no other purpose than to vandalize this project and attack editors.  Darth  griz 98 03:59, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Adopt me
I am looking forward to creating articles for wikipedia but need help regarding where to start. I am hoping you could introduce me to creating and improving articles. Thanks a lot. Amanbhatia 18:58, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Re
Thanks a lot for willing to help me. I have read the tutorial. Before I begin to create new articles, I would like to get some experience by expanding existing articles. Where can I find a list of the articles which need to be edited? Amanbhatia 17:50, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

I was away for a few weeks. Currently I'm studying how articles develop on wiki, and will start writing articles soon. Thank you for your help.--Amanbhatia 17:37, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

NHS
Your last comment seems to sum everything up, if it continues we can request administrative assistance. I think it should be good now, though. -- Will Mak  050389  18:18, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Adoption
Hey i was wondering if you could adopt me and just show me how to get started editing and creating articles so thanks --Haydos46 09:37, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Hey sorry i havent been on in a few days yeah its good now i know what im doing thanks for helping me :D--Haydos46 05:46, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Flameninja (adopted child)
Hey, I was wondering since your Cool and pretty experience and all you could adopt me and teach me about Wiki since I'm not really that good with certain stuff, well any thing at all, and I really am nothing more than a wiki gnome but i do, do good with comic and some Star wars things so if you could adopt me that would be Shiny. (Shiny means Uber cool in my language) Flameninja311 17:55, 10 March, 2007 (UTC) Just so you know I don't really know what UTC is, I really really am a noob/newbie.

-Thanks so much you rock plus your cool that tutorial helped but i"ll ask if i need anything I don't understand. Flameninja311 21:44, 10 March, 2007

Everything is good. Just Created a wiki page, and i have officially made an Okay User talk page. Check it out and tell me what you think.Flameninja311 15:35 (UTC)

Sorry about that
I am a new user as you can guess I was just seeing how the edit fuction works.

I am also a Star Wars fan.

I was correct in one fact there was no A NEW HOPE in 1977 it was just Star Wars the epsiode iv a new hope was added a year later.

Sorry for the trouble. Moododa —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Moododa (talk • contribs) 17:42, 12 March 2007 (UTC).

Adam Lazzara photo
Thanks, but I'm not sure how to license it so it won't get deleted, OR who to have as the author, so I just put it as myself. I didn't think anyone would notice. Haha. What should I do to it then? ShandraShazam 00:11, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Where would I go to find a free photo that would be considered fair to use, if I can't use Google or Photobucket? ShandraShazam 00:22, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

What if I ran it through Photoshop or something and did something weird to it? Then would that make me the author? ShandraShazam 03:40, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Well, thanks. I'm not entirely sure where I can find a free-use image that I don't have to contact anyone about, but I'll try. Thanks again. :) ShandraShazam 04:02, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Adopt-A-User.
I noticed on your user page that you have adopted four users. I'm not in adopt-a-user, but I am interested in becoming part of it at some stage, as I too, like helping new users. Since you have adopted multiple users, I wanted to ask you how your experiences with adopt-a-user have been. Acalamari 19:23, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I responded on my talk page with: Thank you for your answers. It seems in adopt-a-user, I just help users why doing what I'm doing now: giving them help links and advice. Acalamari 20:04, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Vandal using your sig
Just thought I'd let you know that User_talk:74.110.101.98 (which is currently temporarily blocked) vandalized a talk page and used your signature to make it appear you had done it. See – gRegor (talk • contribs) 16:00, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

My RfA
Thank you for your support in my recent successful RfA. --Anthony.bradbury 14:55, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

NHS isn't elitist?
You're a member of NHS, and yet you don't think they're an elitist organization? Isn't there a conflict of interest in your 'guarding' of the NHS article, since you are a member? What I did was 'vandalism'. I agree. I did it to provoke the 'thought police', and it worked. Thanks. :) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 76.213.129.63 (talk) 05:47, 3 April 2007 (UTC).