User talk:Darthkayak

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 04:10, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

history of xinjiang
You are welcome to make edits in the specific places where you see fit. Have fun on your trip to whatever censored place you're going to. previously unsigned comment from  user:Alexkyoung on 09:05, 20 June 2019
 * Thanks! In time I'll make those edits, (though I'll be gone for like a month). Darthkayak (talk) 21:13, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Blackburn
Hi I noticed your reverting edit of my demography counts on the page of 76%. I was actually not trying to vandalize the page. I was pretty much working out the math as there was almost a missing 7% off the page. I chalked it up to the amount said as it seemed to fill in the missing percentage. I apologise if it appeared misleading. Just tried to sort out the maths behind.

Signed JoshuaistheFalco
 * Hi JoshuaIsTheFalco. I completely understand that feeling when the data has issues - as it is it appears to me that the article has somewhat unclear and conflicting sourcing for the demography. I know that you were acting in good faith, and I'm sorry for implying vandalism on your part; that really wasn't appropriate of me. The problem with your edit is that it violates WP:ORIGINAL to attempt to change the numbers in the that way you did. While we are allowed to perform simple arithmetic, when it comes to things like census data we need to be very careful and make sure we are consulting and presenting data from reliable sources rather than just changing the numbers until it looks right. What concerns me is that there was just a discussion on your talk page about this, so in the future I really recommend consulting the guidelines on original research before you try to make changes like that. And remember, you can always take it to the talk pages if you're unsure about something. Thanks,

Darthkayak (talk) 18:57, 15 December 2019 (UTC) Hi Darthkayak, I thank you for your reply and suggestions. I have just been looking around on Google and found a page from Blackburn with Darwen council page. I have found four PDF files for Blackburn and Darwen which are statistics. If you can check them out and feel these clean up the mess I did not mean to create. It be appreciated. https://www.blackburn.gov.uk/facts-and-figures/census/2011-census-locality-profiles. Thanks, User:JoshuaIsTheFalco, 22:53, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

May 2020 AN/I
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Per your previous commentary on the same subject matter. Caradhras Aiguo ( leave language ) 17:30, 26 May 2020 (UTC)