User talk:Darthvader1

liquids banned from commercial airlines
Stop deleting my posts on the August 10th incident. The TSA has very truly and seriously banned all liquids in checked and carryon baggage due to that terror plot in the UK. As far as I know, this ban is permanent and will NEVER be lifted or eased. And how long do you reckon it will be before the TSA passes new rules requiring strip searches of every single passenger at the airport? What happens when all airports becomes exactly like Alcatraz prison? What if the TSA were to even make you check everything including car keys, credit cards, etc? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Darthvader1 (talk • Darthvader1 05:01, 30 January 2007 (UTC)


 * First, please sign talk page postings with ~.
 * Second, what edit are we talking about here? From the talk page comment above, I see that I reverted one edit of yours, in the 2001 article, on October 8th.  And I explained my reasons for that particular deletion. -- Jim Douglas (talk)  (contribs)  00:35, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Your editorial commentary about the TSA
You seem to be upset about the TSA liquid restrictions. Fair enough, I'm not thrilled about them myself. But Wikipedia is not the place to vent your frustration with the TSA. I've removed your editorial commentary from August 10, 2006 transatlantic aircraft plot, and 2006 transatlantic aircraft plot security reaction. Please review our policies regarding neutral point of view and original research, and please try to keep the editorial commentary to yourself. Thanks. -- Jim Douglas (talk) (contribs)  05:03, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Your email
Hey, I'm annoyed about the liquid restrictions too. I never check a bag when I fly, but the last time I flew for business, I had to check a bag because I travel with contact lens solution. I ended up cooling my heels at the baggage carousel for 35 minutes waiting for the bag to show up. I'm not about to argue that those silly rules make sense. My only interest here is to keep the Wikipedia articles focused on objective facts, in line with our neutral point of view policy. As someone said once, I feel your pain...but this isn't the place to vent about it. -- Jim Douglas (talk) (contribs)  06:18, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Characters of The Neverending Story
Hi, I just reverted your edits of "Fantasia" back to "Fantastica", because the article primarily follows the book spelling. Just so you know. Annie D (talk) 02:39, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

RE: TORRO scale
That content was removed because it was unsourced. Some of the (unsourced) content was unnecessary or misleading. And as for the changes and additions to the TORRO scale parameters, sourcing is absolutely necessary if those are to be maintained. Evolauxia (talk) 06:47, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Beaufort scale
Your edits to Beaufort scale are unsourced. Content on Wikipedia must be verifiable. Please provide sourcing. Evolauxia (talk) 18:46, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

GA Reassessment of Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom (NES)
Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom (NES) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Articles are typically reviewed for one week. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here. MuZemike 21:03, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Dupage county/water slide
It doesn't matter because that article will be deleted as soon as someone so inclined sees it. I'm not a deletionist, so it doesn't bohter me, but the article is totally unsourced. Unless you can find some newspaper articles to back up the content, the article will almost certainly be deleted. You can re-add the link to Dupage County, but that will only draw attention to your article and hasten its demise. Sorry. &mdash; goethean &#2384; 23:01, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

Link
&mdash; goethean &#2384; 23:07, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:22, 23 November 2015 (UTC)