User talk:Darthyoda of Tempest

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Antidermis2319 21:58, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Rahaga
Please stop the edits and tell for me and others: this informations about the Rahaga and Toa Hagah is official? Antidermis2319 22:00, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Yes it is. I went to a talk and the man there said these things and I made notes.


 * The Bionicle Encyclopedia specifically states that Roodaka's Rhotuka is responsible for the Rahaga's mutation, nothing else; and that the Toa Hagah's tools and masks (other than Norik's and Iruini's) have not been revealed. If you want to claim your facts are true, name a source more specific than just "some guy". Drakhan 22:14, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Yes, the encyclopedia says that, but this was a talk about the SECRETS of the bionicle world, including information you can't get anywhere else. I don't know the name of the man, but he worked at LEGO, and swore this stuff was true.

These notes are wrong to do. See help article, and Drakhan means where website, source or other thing if you found these informations.Antidermis2319 22:20, 27 September 2006 (UTC) (P.S.: If these informations are created by you, it soon delete)

Ah, yes. If this fact as true, wait a official released or information to put this information, please.Antidermis2319 22:23, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Rahaga/Toa Hagah
An editor has nominated Rahaga/Toa Hagah, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:14, 1 January 2008 (UTC)