User talk:Daruma-Q

April 2019
Hello. Your recent edit to Archbishop John Carroll High School appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. ''Per WP:BRD you should not have restored your material without first discussing it on the article's talk page. We don't list alumni or staff unless they are notable. Unless there are exceptional circumstances (people who would obviously qualify for an article if one were written) that means they must have a Wikipedia article to demonstrate their notability.

And what's your evidence for suggesting that the editor who removed the list, user:GPL93, may have a conflict of interest with this school? He or she has been active for a year, has more than 6000 edits, and shows no sign of any particular interest in this one school, whereas you have been active for a month, and have never edited anything but this article. It is considered a personal attack to make unwarranted accusations (see WP:PA). I see no justification for this accusation, and even if there were, the edit summary would not be the appropriate place for it. If you think there is a conflict of interest then first discuss it with the editor.'' Meters (talk) 23:22, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
 * and . I have no connection to Archbishop Carroll High School, in fact I attended another Philadelphia-area Catholic High School, which I disclosed when I added to La Salle’s list of notable alumni. I removed the list of former teachers because none of them met Wikipedia’s notability standards and lists of teachers aren’t encyclopedic. While I do work in PR/Marketing, I have never edited Wikipedia as part of any of my jobs, I actually try to do the opposite (I guess as some sort of penance). Best, GPL93 (talk) 01:12, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Yup, I saw that while I was checking your history to see if there was any justification at all for the suggestion that you were editing on behalf of the school. This was a bad edit, an appropriate and explained removal by you, and a bad restore with an inappropriate edit summary. Meters (talk) 04:22, 1 May 2019 (UTC)