User talk:Darwin-rover

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Van Tucky 00:30, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

September 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Sugababes has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Gsmgm (talk) 17:34, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for your report to AIV and work fighting vandalism. The sort of vandalism you caught there is quite serious, and I have gone further and deleted the revisions from Wikipedia entirely. In general we try to warn people four times before blocking them, but in this case the only edits the user had made were vandalism (and quite serious vandalism at that). As a result, I indefinitely blocked the editor. Let me know if you have any questions or if there's anything I can help with. Thanks again and keep up the great work! --TeaDrinker (talk) 00:10, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

WP:AIV
Hello

This is to let you know that I declined your recent report to WP:AIV. Generally when someone vandalises the encyclopedia they are given 4 warnings before we'd consider blocking them and the warnings must all be recent, I'd say that all 4 warnings would have to be issued within 24 hours of each other. We certainly wouldn't block the user that you reported at this stage though, when I looked back through the rest of his contributions they were absolutely fine. Any questions, please ask me on my talk page.--5 albert square (talk) 22:56, 9 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Greetings! Unfortunately, I've declined two of your recent reports to WP:AIV for the same reason as explained above. Please make sure that the vandal has been sufficiently warned. Your work is appreciated and you have the makings to be a great editor. Don't hesitate to contact myself or another experienced editor if you have any questions. Tyrol5   [Talk]  18:54, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Microsoft Game Studios vs Microsoft Studios
I noticed that you had changed this in the Trials HD article. Just so you're aware we go by the historical name of the company at the time the game was released, so the studio name change only applies to new releases. Thanks for the good faith edit, though! --Teancum (talk) 01:57, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Haunt (video game) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Haunt (video game) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Haunt (video game) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SL93 (talk) 19:34, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

May 2012
Hello. I noticed that you attempted to file a deletion discussion but did not complete the process. Please note that, when listing an article for deletion, a discussion page needs to be made for other users to discuss whether to keep or delete the article. This is typically done by following the steps listed here. Note that if you are editing as an unregistered user, you cannot create a discussion page. Please consider registering an account or asking another user to help you complete the process at Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:13, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thank you for helping out with Matter - I always procrastinate on doing the categorization..! CaseyPenk (talk) 00:39, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
 * As well as Wreckateer! CaseyPenk (talk) 00:40, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

July 2012
Thank you for making a report on Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, it appears that the editor you reported was not sufficiently warned. If the user continues to vandalise after a recent final warning, please re-report it. Thank you. Danger! High voltage! 01:30, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Boss Film Studios, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tales from the Crypt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

October 2012
Thank you for making a report on Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, it appears that the editor you reported may not have engaged in vandalism, or the user was not sufficiently or appropriately warned. Please note there is a difference between vandalism and unhelpful or misguided edits made in good faith. If the user continues to vandalise after a recent final warning, please re-report it. Thank you. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 23:34, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
 * On review, it appears that you've been warned about inappropriate AIV reports before. Please refrain from making AIV reports if you won't take the time to learn how the process works.  If you have questions, please ask.  -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 23:37, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kinect Sports Rivals, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rare (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Khalid ibn Abdullah
Your comments would be appreciated at Talk:Khalid ibn Abdullah.  Tigerboy1966  08:23, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Input on image decision
Hi you are invited to vote for the image to be used on the LG G2 infobox page at Talk:LG G2. Thanks! GadgetsGuy (talk) 06:35, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Lightning Fish for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lightning Fish is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lightning Fish until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. IgelRM (talk) 21:22, 6 April 2024 (UTC)