User talk:DarylC

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Helpful links: Editing || Writing a great article || Naming || Style Manual || Policies || Reassigning old edits.

Other Questions? Help || Village pump(everyone gathers here) || What Wikipedia is not

Maintenance: Deleting articles || all maintenance tasks (see also open tasks, below)

Uploading images: please note the origins and copyright status of every image you upload, otherwise we won't be able to use those images in many versions of WP.

Finally, to sign comments on talk pages, type four tildes, like this:  +sj+  09:03, 31 Aug 2004 (UTC) . This automatically adds your name and the current time.

I hope you enjoy being a Wikipedian on en:! Drop us a note at New user log so we can meet you and help you get started. You can also leave me questions at my talk page. +sj +   Monday, July 29,  UTC

North American X-10
Hi Daryl - the material you copied for the X-10 article potentially creates copyright and licencing problems for Wikipedia - note that that USAF Museum material cannot be assumed to be in the public domain (see ). If you want to contribute a version in your own words, please follow the instructions on the page. Given your contributions to date, you might also like to take a look at WikiProject Aircraft, the informal effort to co-ordinate aircraft articles across the 'pedia. Cheers --Rlandmann 01:16, 1 Sep 2004 (UTC)

NASA Project Gemini Familiarization Manual
Use our sister site Wikisource if you want to publish the manual online, not Wikipedia. GeneralPatton 23:55, 1 Sep 2004 (UTC)


 * I've just listed the page at Votes for deletion - don't be alarmed by the ominous-sounding name, it just means that it's a suggestion (pending community input) for the page to eventually disappear from the Wikipedia namespace and be relocated in Wikisource --Rlandmann 00:37, 2 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Novogorod
Hi again! I just renamed "Novgorod (battleship)" to "Russian battleship Novgorod" to bring it in line with Naming conventions (ships). Nice article about a bizarre concept :) --Rlandmann 11:25, 4 Sep 2004 (UTC)

NowCommons: Image:HardtackOak.JPG
Image:HardtackOak.JPG is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:HardtackOak.JPG and Image:HardtackSorocco.JPG as Commons:Image:HardtackSorocco.JPG. Commons is a repository of free media that can be used on all MediaWiki wiki's. The image(s) will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case:. Note that this is an automated message. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 11:06, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Wigwam.JPG
Thank you for uploading File:Wigwam.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:08, 30 August 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:08, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Discovery One for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Discovery One is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Discovery One until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. RL0919 (talk) 18:01, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Sulaco (fictional spacecraft) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sulaco (fictional spacecraft) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sulaco (fictional spacecraft) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 13:24, 2 December 2022 (UTC)