User talk:Darzhe1

Speedy deletion nomination of LiqVon Agency


A tag has been placed on LiqVon Agency, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the |the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. SwisterTwister  talk  07:16, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Your recent article
The article is you recently created is a violation of Wikipedia guidelines, and Wikipedia is not intended as a vehicle of advertising and promotional use. Thanks, SwisterTwister   talk  07:18, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of LiqVon Agency


A tag has been placed on LiqVon Agency, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the |the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. SwisterTwister  talk  08:07, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Last warning
This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please stop creating articles with an advertising tone, please read the guidelines or you will be blocked indefinitely. SwisterTwister  talk  08:07, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Reasoning for Speedy Deletion nomination of LiqVon Agency
So you're wondering why my fellow new page patrollers marked your page for speedy deletion. Let me explain it, so you don't post again and get blocked. First off, their should not be any other articles like your one. Now, if you had made Tom Cruise famous, their may be grounds for your article. Similar if your organisation had been phone hacking, which hopefully it hasn't. But your article was pure advertising. You even said "interested? contact us now" Now if we look at an article like Microsoft, it's a company, but it maintains neutral point of view (well it should, it's been a while since I've looked at it). Not only that, but it is one of the biggest corporations in the world.

If you know of an article that you believe is blatant advertising then let me know, because it might actually have slipped passed the patrollers.

And please don't be tempted to make another account and re-post the same information. Find other ways of business promotion.

--Thompson.matthew (talk) 08:19, 24 July 2011 (UTC)