User talk:Das Baz

--Piewalker 19:00, 6 July 2006 (UTC) Hello , and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your recent edit to that is part of the Latter Day Saint movement WikiProject. We welcome your contributions and hope that you will stay and contribute more. Here are some links that I found helpful:
 * Introduction to Wikipedia and Editing
 * A tutorial on editing
 * Wikipedia's Manual of Style
 * How to write a great article
 * Policies and Guidelines
 * How to rename, redirect or merge an article
 * Manual of Style (Latter Day Saints)
 * Naming conventions (Latter Day Saints)

If you run into a dispute, please use the Talk pages and the Latter Day Saint movement project talk page to discuss subjects (especially controversial ones) to help reach consensus. But don't be afraid to be bold!! Also, as new Mormonism-related articles are created, please make sure to add them to List of articles about Mormonism.

Remember to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically add your name and the time after your comments.

And finally, if you have any questions or doubts, don't hesitate to contact me

Jesus/Josephus

 * Jesus said, "Turn the other cheek." He was crucified by Pilate after this action. No other candidate has been proposed for the leader of the Caesarea action. I have not yet heard or read one single good argument againts Jesus being the leader of this action. Plenty of good reasons for, no reason against. - Das Baz, 15 February 2006, 10:08 Nonviolent resistance article ---

Ammonite is another name for the people of Anti-Nephi-Lehi. -- User:Das Baz 16:44, 16 Februa

If the whole world rejects the truth, it still remains the truth. -- User:Das Baz 16:44, 16 February 2

It is not just that the Caesarean Incident is close to the Crucifixion account. It is also that Jesus was the first great Teacher of Nonviolent Resistance, and thus the most likely candidate for the leader of the Caesarean Protest.

Learn to discuss theories rationally instead of calling for censorship and preventing the free exchange of ideas. How do you know other people do not accept the theory if you suppress it and erase it? -- User:Das Baz 16:44, 16 February 2006 Hey, it was I, Das Baz, who created the article on Nonviolent Resistance in the first place. Give people a chance to consider the theory. -- User:Das Baz 16:44, 16 February 2006

Gandhi may have independently discovered this theory, since he considered Jesus his teacher on Nonviolent Resistance.- Das Baz, 16 February 2006. -10:43 AM. Why exactly does this theory, the Caesarean Paradigm, enrage you so much? What exactly is your problem with it? - DB.

And, by the way, I had absolutely nothing to do with that French-Turkish linguistic idea. -Das Baz, 3/2/2006, 10:27 AM

Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Proposed deletion of Neaniskos


The article Neaniskos has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unsourced since creation in 2006. No indication passes WP:GNG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Loksmythe (talk) 14:14, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bartholomew Cubbins


The article Bartholomew Cubbins has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "not notable character"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Finlan Bendbow-Rendeck (talk) 13:58, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Bartholomew Cubbins for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bartholomew Cubbins is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Bartholomew Cubbins until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Finlan Bendbow-Rendeck (talk) 20:42, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Timothy Redwine for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Timothy Redwine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Timothy Redwine until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Suonii180 (talk) 16:34, 22 May 2024 (UTC)