User talk:Dasha enfp

June 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Myers-Briggs Type Indicator has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: 'googlepages\.com' (link(s): http://www.dasha-enfp.com-a.googlepages.com/Abstract_Rodionova.pdf). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thorougly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creators copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 22:10, 19 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Dasha enfp, I read the abstract you posted, and I think the information is quite valuable. I recommend that instead of linking to the website, you incorporate the main points of the abstract into the Wikipedia article, then for the reference, use the journal in which the article was published rather than the website. If you're the author of the journal article, then there is some conflict of interest, but I also think that the Wikipedia article could benefit a great deal from this type of analysis. It's sorely lacking. ThreeOfCups (talk) 23:10, 19 June 2008 (UTC)


 * ThreeOfCups, thanks for your kind reaction to my naive attempt. It is fine to follow your recommendation to incorporate the main points of the abstract into the Wikipedia article. Have I to add the information to the page "Myers-Briggs Type Indicator" or to the "Keirsey Temperament Sorter (KTS)"? The types involved in my investigation are from Keirsey’s theory, but the label MBTI itself is somewhat more convenient… I am actually the author of this research (PhD thesis in psychology) and would like my results to be available to the international MBTI community. Thank you for the support.Dasha enfp (talk) 03:44, 23 June 2008 (UTC)