User talk:Dashoopa

Welcome Dashoopa! Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are 41,240,183 registered editors!

Hello Dashoopa. Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions!

I'm Vincentvikram, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge. Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type  here on your talk page and someone will try to help. To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Mypage/sandbox&action=edit&preload=Template:User_Sandbox/preload create your own personal sandbox] for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put  on your userpage.

Please remember to: The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!
 * Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the OOUI JS signature icon LTR.png button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes  at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp.
 * Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.

 Sincerely, Vikram Vincent 03:45, 28 March 2021 (UTC)   [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Vincentvikram&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Welcome_to_Wikipedia/user-talk_preload (Leave me a message)]

Español

Deutsch

Français

Italiano

עברית

Русский

日本語

Polski

فارسی

March 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Men's rights movement, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 05:37, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I also added a secondary source that summarized research on judicial bias against men. If you look at my edit again, my Maldonado (2005) citation did that providing several empirical research that backed up the claim that custody arrangments were in favor of women over men. Cheers. Dashoopa (talk) 16:41, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
 * The article is about the men's rights movement. It is not about the various ways that men have got the shaft. We describe the topic in terms of how the MRM is related to these things, not about these things alone. Don't try to argue the MRM case by using statistics. Binksternet (talk) 17:56, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

April 2021
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Circumcision. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Alexbrn (talk) 17:51, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Hello, I'm MrOllie. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 18:50, 5 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Hello, I am getting the same sort of disrespect and abuse from Alexbrn on my talk page. I have just now done a search regarding this, it appears he has been disciplined before, as there was a media report regarding his unfavorable interaction with research Dr. Angela Stanton. Gsonnenf (talk) 18:18, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Trying to get a faction going now. This personalisation is looking stranger and stranger. Alexbrn (talk) 18:21, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Important Notice
Generalrelative (talk) 02:13, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Whose sock are you, please?
"Trust me, I'm not a newcomer to .. Wikipedia. So whose sock are you, please? Bishonen &#124; tålk 18:02, 5 May 2021 (UTC).
 * When I said I'm not a newcomer, that means before I became a user, I have been used to all the info presented here before, and became a user in order to dispute some of the stuff said and make valuable contributions. Dashoopa (talk) 19:20, 5 May 2021 (UTC)