User talk:Dasitmanelol

November 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: We Stitch These Wounds was changed by Dasitmanelol (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.855784 on 2012-11-03T16:04:14+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:04, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at We Stitch These Wounds, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Webclient101 talk 16:16, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of James Eagen Holmes


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as James Eagen Holmes, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mr T (Talk?)  [ (New thread?) ] 16:43, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Please stop introducing jokes into articles, such as those you created at Olchfa School. Wikipedia is a serious encyclopedia, and contributions of this type are considered vandalism. Continuing to add jokes and other disruptive content into articles may lead to you being blocked from editing. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 16:44, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. --Bongwarrior (talk) 17:35, 3 November 2012 (UTC)