User talk:Dasomm

Disambiguation link notification for March 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of foreign films set in Japan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jack O'Connell. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

May 2023
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Sweden did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! —DIYeditor (talk) 19:42, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 14
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Television in Slovakia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Martin.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 14 July 2023 (UTC)


 * @Dasomm please see Operation Prosperity Guardian talk page. 173.79.229.156 (talk) 00:49, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

July 2023
Thanks for updating Slovakia's global passport rank. Just as a reminder for when you update from an online citation, it's recommended that you update the |access-date= parameter to when you viewed the online version. (See here) I've already verified and updated it myself :) FutureFlowsLoveYou (talk) 09:38, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

April 2024
Hello. I have noticed that you edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! WikiPate (talk) 20:12, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Encyclo-P-D
Got your back on this one, the guy seems to have decided to enrage just about everyone involved haha Øksfjord (talk) 21:26, 9 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Evidence of WP:HARASS Encylo-P-D (talk) 21:31, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
 * You are reported Encylo-P-D, next time dont start edit war and before any important edit star to solve things on talk page. Dasomm (talk) 21:33, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I very much doubt this counts as an evidence of harassment. That would be a specified collusion to commit ourselves to offensive behaviour (either direct rudeness or other uncivil behaviours - see the page), which both Dasomm and I abstain from. Øksfjord (talk) 21:35, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
 * “someone else who finds them exasperating.” Encylo-P-D (talk) 21:38, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
 * To exasperate - to cause irritation or annoyance to. See Merriam-Webster. I sense no offensive connotation. Øksfjord (talk) 21:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

May 2024
Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at List of Studio Ghibli works, you may be blocked from editing. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 17:15, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Please educate yourself and find out what means co-production, link If you dont have enough information about Studio Ghibli and filmmaking, you should not edit the article. Ghost in the Shell 2 is also co-production and it is not part of Ghibli Feature films in the article about Studio Ghibli. Dasomm (talk) 17:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of defunct airlines of Spain. Jetstreamer $Talk$ 22:30, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
 * If you read article of that airlines, you can see, the airlines are defunct, so they belong to List of defunct airlines of Spain :) But if you want to keep the list without these information, its not my problem. Dasomm (talk) 22:31, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

June 2024
Your recent editing history at List of IIHF World Championship medalists shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Flibirigit (talk) 01:04, 9 June 2024 (UTC)