User talk:DataSynapseisascam

Your Datasynapse modifications
In Wikipedia, we need verifiability. Anything that is not verifiable is below the threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia. -- Raysonho (talk) 18:56, 10 March 2009 (UTC)


 * All of the information I have added to the DataSynapse profile is verifiable. I am happy to provide specific information to certify that everything written is true.


 * I googled for Datasynapse layoffs and could not find anything supporting such claim. If you can find a reliable source, then we can add he info to the page. -- Raysonho (talk) 19:03, 10 March 2009 (UTC)


 * A call into DataSynapse directly is all it takes. For example, the Chicago office is no longer in existence and that's just the start. Leadership still listed on their website has been gone since early 2009, including: Mark Milford | Executive Vice President - Global Field Operations and Tom Baehr | Senior Vice President - North America, amongst others. It is misleading to the public to have such information published on their site. Additionally, the reality is they've gone deep with layoffs and if you actually did Google it, you would have read multiple updates on the topic.


 * Again, please provide links to any web pages. -- Raysonho (talk) 19:19, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_2009_Jan_13/ai_n31186019 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.235.42.131 (talk) 00:36, 11 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The source you provided does not back up the claims you make in your article. Please stop adding the material without proper sourcing.  And when you do, please remember to utilize a neutral point of view.  If you have an axe to grind, take it to your personal blog.


 * [[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. TastyPoutine talk (if you dare)  02:04, 11 March 2009 (UTC)