User talk:Dataport676

KingofFilm


 * Checkuser cannot prove a negative. —  Jeremy  ( v^_^v Dittobori ) 22:19, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
 * English isn't my first language, I'm having trouble understanding what "prove a negative" is supposed to mean.
 * Simply put, Checkuser cannot prove one is not someone else because of various circumstances (work, moving house, vacation, open proxies, etc.) that can cause one's IP to change and because one who seeks to have such a CU done on him will invariably be knowledgeable enough to change his IP address through some means to hoodwink it. Thus, Checkuser cannot prove a negative. —  Jeremy  ( v^_^v Dittobori ) 22:27, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
 * You're saying because I know about Checkuser I'm automatically guilty? Oh for gods sake, this is ridiculous. Looks at my edits; I was answering questions at the Reference Desk when he posted that welcome message. That is the only reason I made a comment on his RFA.
 * No, I'm saying that Checkuser cannot prove empirically that you aren't KingofFilm. Knowing about the Checkuser tool isn't something one gets sanctioned over. —  Jeremy  ( v^_^v Dittobori ) 23:38, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

I've been busy in real life so I haven't had a chance to follow up on this, so I apologize for the lateness of this message. I will try and explain the situation in detail, as my previous unbock attempts were unsuccessful. I am currently blocked by User:PeterSymonds "per WP:DUCK". I contest this block as being false; I am not User:KingofFilm, nor have I abused multiple accounts. I created an account on the 5 March 2010 to answer a question on the Reference Desk. One minuet later User:KingofFilm, a registered user since 27 January, posted a message to my talk page asking me to vote on his RfA. He posted identical messages to three other users. I went to his RfA page and posted a message of support to be friendly. It was obvious he wasn't going to succeed, being a newish user with few edits, but I wanted to be friendly nonetheless. Because of this one edit, I was then blocked by User:PeterSymonds "per WP:DUCK", as he believed I was User:KingofFilm. I am not User:KingofFilm, I have not abuse multiple accounts, and the evidence used for this block is not valid as I have explain why I edited his RfA.

Yeah, KoF here. Dataport is innocent. K? -KingOfFilm —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.219.123.213 (talk) 20:56, 5 December 2010 (UTC)