User talk:Dauzlee

Welcome, Dauzlee!


Welcome to Wikipedia, Dauzlee! I'm Royal Autumn Crest, and I've been assigned as your mentor. Around 10% of new Wikipedia accounts receive a mentor randomly taken from a list of volunteers. It just means I'm here to help with anything you need! We need to have all kinds of people working together to create an online encyclopedia, so I'm glad you're here. Over time, you will figure out what you enjoy doing the most on Wikipedia.

You might have noticed that you have access to a tutorial and suggested edits. It's recommended that you take advantage of this, as it'll make learning how to edit Wikipedia easier.

If you need assistance with anything or have any questions, click on the "Get editing help" button on the bottom right corner of your screen. This will open up a module with links to help pages and a place to ask me questions. You can also ask me questions directly on my talk page, or go here to get help from the wider community.

Again, welcome to Wikipedia!Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 03:38, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

K Dauzlee (talk) 04:33, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

CS1 error on Ilyushin Il-76
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Ilyushin Il-76, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Dauzlee&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d=&preloadparams%5b%5d=1198539770 report it to my operator]. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:17, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
 * A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ilyushin_Il-76&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1198539770%7CIlyushin%20Il-76%5D%5D Ask for help])

Introduction to contentious topics
TylerBurden (talk) 18:08, 25 January 2024 (UTC)


 * May I please also note that, according to WP:RUSUKR new users may not edit articles related to Russian-Ukrainian conflict. Replacing Kiev with Kyiv is certainly such edit. Ymblanter (talk) 22:46, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I know, I did not change Kyiv to Kiev in article related to modern times, I only changed such article if it was historical (for example related to Kievan Rus) for consistency (people already know Kiev is Kyiv so adding "(Kyiv)" beside Kiev is sometime unnecessary) Dauzlee (talk) 01:27, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * The English Wikipedia consensus is that we use Kyiv after 1991. For historical articles (certainly for everything before 1917) Kiev must be used. Ymblanter (talk) 18:20, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Edit summaries like this combined with a lot of strange unexplained edits changing referenced content from "according to" to "claimed", which apparently according to this other opinionated edit summary you think is less credible, regardless of what wording the actual reference uses, seems like some rather WP:TENDENTIOUS signs for editing this topic. TylerBurden (talk) 20:27, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
 * There is no evidence that Russia actually use human wave tactics, most of them were rather squad sized assault or armored attacks, which is while attritive, doesn't fit the very definition that was clearly stated on the article itself. Wikipedia editor love to consume any media reports as if they were 100% truthful. I add "claimed" and any words that doubted the media reports especially for example if it came from Ukraine which is as propagandistic as the Russian. Some source cited doesn't have strong evidence such as photo or video of such things happen so usage of "claimed" or "allegedly" should be allowed. You see a lot of western mainstream media that Wikipedia consider "reliable" love to put sensationalist and baseless claims for example Russia ran out of missile (or anything) as early as March 2022, until it was proven false later (this report from wikipedia considered reliable Reuter from march 2022 https://www.reuters.com/world/russia-running-out-precision-munitions-ukraine-war-pentagon-official-2022-03-25/ for example). So, like a lot of Wikipedia editor used the word "claimed" or "allegedly" when citing Russian report, I used it for article when some dubious Ukrainian claims without hard evidence. Dauzlee (talk) 04:59, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
 * That is how Wikipedia works though, the content is dictated by WP:RS, not by what Wikipedia editors deem "hard evidence". Mainstream media generally considered reliable by Wikipedia can definetely be wrong, it's still far better than relying on whatever Wikipedia editors consider "hard evidence", especially when millions of people are fooled by things such as deepfakes every day. The issue is that you are twisting wording to make things seem less credible than how the references actually put it, and given that your edits always seem to be slanted against Ukraine in some way, your editing appears WP:TENDENTIOUS. TylerBurden (talk) 13:31, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

Attention
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. PAWPERSO (talk) 18:20, 9 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Wow so scarry, a recently created account Dauzlee (talk) 18:22, 9 June 2024 (UTC)