User talk:DavGreg

Speedy deletion nomination of Stuttgart Regional Medical Center


A tag has been placed on Stuttgart Regional Medical Center requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 07:00, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Stuttgart Regional Medical Center for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stuttgart Regional Medical Center is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Stuttgart Regional Medical Center until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 19:48, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited VII Corps (United States), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Schlossplatz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:14, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Observation Tower Burgholzhof, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PX (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Category:Stuttgart Military Community
Category:Stuttgart Military Community, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:49, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Ways to improve Wallace Barracks
Hi, I'm Legoktm. DavGreg, thanks for creating Wallace Barracks!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. I noticed that you used German Wikipedia as a source. Technically it isn't considered to be a WP:RS, so you may want to cite the source that de.wp used directly. Thanks, Legoktm (talk) 09:23, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Disambiguation link notification for September 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited United States European Command, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page V Corps (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Radiologic Technology/Technologist Articles
The current page is wanting and in serious need of expansion and updating. There is no information on the field outside of the United States excepting a small amount of information about the UK, despite serious differences in training and scope of practice between the US and other countries. As a Registered Radiologic Technologist, I can assure you that is correct. As soon as I can gather the information I will post updated information to the article. I have already added a few quick things I knew I could quickly attribute to online sources and cleaned up the writing somewhat (hopefully).

The related page on the American Society of Radiologic Technologists is also a mess in need of updating and conformance to standards - it was before tonight written much like a press release. I have only scratched the surface of what needs to happen there.

If there are RTs among the editors, especially from other countries, your input to improve the article would be greatly appreciated.

DavGreg (talk) 04:57, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)