User talk:Dave Rabbit

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam);
 * and you must always:
 * 1) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Conflict of Interest. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dougie WII (talk • contribs) 06:07, 1 November 2007

Re: Radio First Termer
Hi. As User:Dougie WII pointed out quite a while ago, you really shouldn't be editing the article Radio First Termer. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for promotion. As well, cutting and pasting from websites that don't publish under a free license, even if the website is yours, amounts to a copyright violation, and material that violates copyright will always be removed. Even without the copyright problem, content taken from personal websites is not suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, because such sources are not considered reliable. Material drawn from your own experience is likewise unsuitable due to Wikipedia's policy prohibiting the use of original research.

Contributions about subjects other than yourself or your projects -- drawing on reliable, third-party, published sources -- continue to be welcome. -- Rrburke (talk) 18:27, 2 July 2010 (UTC)