User talk:Davec01

March 2017
Hello, I'm NeilN. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Ukraine without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Neil N  talk to me 07:03, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Flood myth
It would seem obvious that an article titled Flood myth should use the term in the article. If you want to change it, you need to raise a move request. Doug Weller talk 05:20, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Please don't delete part of a quote and sources
As you did here. Doug Weller talk 05:22, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

June 2017
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Darius the Mede, you may be blocked from editing. Given your other edits, your removal of sourced text in this article also appears to be a violation of WP:NPOV. Doug Weller  talk 18:01, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

July 2017
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Doug Weller talk 11:53, 7 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Hi Davec01 - I think there might be an issue with your possible intent vs what was perceived with the edits you've been making. I understand that you're removing what is believed to be inaccurate, but you left no edit summary explaining this and you didn't start a discussion on the article's talk page first; you instead have been removing a high amount of content from some articles, and didn't respond nor ask for help when other editors reverted your changes and left you messages and warnings on your talk page. May I ask why you did not do so? I'm willing to accept this as a learning opportunity and consider unblocking you, but you have to agree on some things first and I want to include Doug Weller on this appeal, because I'd like his input and his approval as well.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   05:01, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Actually... never mind. I saw your edit here and I'm no longer considering an unblock.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   05:03, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

{{unblock reviewed|reason=@oshkosh b'gosh, I hope you understood the simplicity of my edit because in case i didn't spell it out enough, FUCK YOU. You atheist trolls keep spreading lies and trying to indoctrinate the public to conform to your beliefs is unethical, and immoral. When your site collapses, which it will because your a cancer to society I will feel no remorse for you.