User talk:Daven200520

If an editor removes a comment from their talk page, whether the comment is legitimate or not, do not add the comment back again. Respect their wishes. It's counter-productive to force the issue.

Note that users who repeatedly restore comments to a user's talk page more than three times in a 24 hour period may be blocked for violating the three-revert rule.

Anthony Allen Shore
I just wanted to let you know I removed your prod from this article because it was not a hoax. In the future it might be worth taking a minute to check Google to determine if something may be a hoax or not. That said, the article definitly requires cleanup and possibly may not meet notability requirements.Rcurtis5 (talk) 23:31, 20 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Noted--Jayson (talk) 23:40, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Investor Education
Just wanted to request you go back and look at the Investor education site that was labelled as written like an advertisement. I've finally had a chance to get back there and add some content/references. I hope this will result in the tag being taken down. If not, let me know and I'll keep working away to try and get it inline with Wikipedia guidelines.

Wavebird
I could be doing this wrong Looks like our talk page its been a while since I have edited wikipedia. Anyways I wanted to refute a few of your changes to the WaveBird Article. I would like to point out that I did site the IGN article to point out that the Logitech Cordless Action controller came out with in months of the Wavebird same year and likely with little influence. The only section I edited other then a few wording changes that I felt are misplaced in the article are related to the WaveBirds influence on the current generation. And even with its sources before mine I doubt any one can find Sony and Microsoft admitting that they loved the wave bird so much they made there wireless controllers after it.

The line about 802.11x might be a little biased I can find a source if you want, but the existence of the Logitech Cordless Action is not and has a reasonable source to site when it came out. This is something more for the talk page of the article and I will keep up with it over the next few weeks to get an opinion before changing it again, but I do feel that your reversals are in error. At least in the influence section. Sorry for not doing all edits at one time, but I like to edit by section so there is less source hints the 4 edits as I was getting the article in order. The final change you made was putting back that the Wavebird is Unique because it was an RF device on 2.4Ghz which is really naive to me. 2.4ghz tech has existed in Keyboard/Phones/Mice/Remotes/ and many other devices long before 2002 the WaveBird was unique because it was first party not because it used radio communication. That edit only cleared things up in the article. I ask you think about your changes for me after what I have said. If you want I can provide more sources related to wireless tech and its age, but I think the already included links to wireless will back up my statments about the 2.4ghz range.

Thank you for your time I really try to keep Wikipedia clean, I just wanted to stay anon this time as it was a small edit. Kept anon because I needed you to recognize the IP

-72.148.115.85 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Daven200520 (talk • contribs).

Dean preparations
It's not important what the politicians say, that's not preparations. It's what they do as a government that are preparations. – Chacor 07:32, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
 * They as a government took the step to block entrants, so that would be considered preparations. However, saying "we are prepared!" isn't really useful information to put in the preparations section, imo. – Chacor 07:39, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Also, can I suggest you please get a spell checker? You're capitalising words unnecessarily. – Chacor 07:39, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 08:50, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Re
Please note that the placement of a block notice does not cause a user to be blocked; blocks must be effectuated by administrators. Non-administrators may request that users engaging in vandalism be blocked at Administrator intervention against vandalism. John254 18:50, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Generally, users become sysops after making a successful application at Requests for adminship. While there are no formal criteria for adminship, a successful request for adminship generally requires that the candidate has:


 * (1) at least several thousand edits
 * (2) some significant participation in the creation of encyclopedic content, the Wikipedia namespace, and RC Patrol
 * (3) not engaged in recent, significant policy violations or other disruption
 * (4) avoided recent participation in significant disputes or other controversy with other good-faith users.


 * At the moment, I am not a sysop. John254 19:21, 19 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Whoa! You should definitely not take John's word for it, Daven, because he's massively overstating what it takes to become a sysop (admin is the common term, actually). Basically all it takes is that you show some dedication to the project, and show that we can trust your judgment. For dedication, pick your own area, it really doesn't matter. For judgment, it may actually help if you were engaged in a dispute, because this tells us how you deal with disputes. One that starts screaming and insulting people in a dispute is not a good admin; one who deals with it level-headedly and resolves it somehow likely is. It really isn't such a big deal.  &gt; R a d i a n t &lt;  08:29, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

All My Children
Not 'vandalism' --- I'm making corrections and adding more details. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Special:Contributions/ (talk)

Block messages
Hello! Firstly, thankyou for your hard work reverting vandalism and doing other tasks around Wikipedia, it is greatly appreciated. However, please remember that you cannot block users simply by placing a block notice on their talk pages; only an administrator has the power to block IPs and users. The IP 63.226.201.123 has now been blocked by my request but in future you can report users for vandalising at the administrator intervention against vandalism noticeboard. If the user has a full set of warnings and are actively vandalising then they will normally be blocked and thus, prevented from editing. If you have any questions about this or anything else, please feel free to contact me on my talk page. Happy editing! --Farosdaughter 20:12, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

RE: Word of Wisdom

 * Copied from User talk:71.35.46.20

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Sandbox for test edits. Daven200520 23:15, 19 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Please look at the dif again -- there was no vandalism or unhelpful edits. I substituted the less elegant below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 1) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:47, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:


 * 1) Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
 * 2) Editor-focused central editing dashboard
 * 3) "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
 * 4) Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
 * 5) Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded User wikipedia/RC Patrol (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sammoon.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Sammoon.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:17, 2 December 2017 (UTC)