User talk:Davepeters13

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! MuffledThud (talk) 15:13, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Classic Car Life
A tag has been placed on Classic Car Life requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. MuffledThud (talk) 15:13, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at Classic Car Life
Hi there Davepeters13! I saw that you added a hangon tag to a page which you created, Classic Car Life. This is good, but in the process you removed the tag requesting deletion under CSD A7. Even though there is a hangon on the page, the deletion template should remain there. But don't worry, this doesn't mean that the page is going to get deleted. Make sure you edit the talk page of the page nominated for deletion, located at Talk:Classic Car Life, administrators will look at your reason why the page should remain before they decide what to do. Thanks - SDPatrolBot (talk) 15:25, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 15:26, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Notability
I see that on the talk page of the article Classic Car Life you wrote "I have not finished creating the article yet which is a review of the website as a whole. As the site has just been launched, not all user functionality is active and until it is I cannot write a full review". However, Wikipedia accepts only articles about subjects which have received significant coverage in independent sources: see the notability guidelines for further details. If the website is new and there is little information about it is available, then it is not notable by Wikipedia's standards, and so not suitable for an article. Writing a new review of your own is regarded as original research, which is not acceptable in Wikipedia articles: we report only subject matter which has already been published in reliable sources which are independent of the subject. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:40, 22 February 2010 (UTC)