User talk:Davepio

Welcome! Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 19:18, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Image question
Hi Davepio,

Looking at the images you uploaded on commons, I see File:Thermal Cope rearrangement.jpg and File:Thermal rearrangement.jpg, which differ only in the presence/absence of an alkene on the upper-right edge of the final structure. Is one of these images a mistake that should be deleted, or are there really two different variants of this reaction that give different products from the same reactants and intermediate? DMacks (talk) 02:34, 17 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The image without the olefin in the upper right edge was a mistake. It should be deleted. Sorry, I did not know how to delete the image File:Thermal rearrangement.jpg.Davepio (talk) 13:50, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I see you found the deletion process there:) If you find a quick actual mistake, it's usually okay to upload a new version to the same filename to avoid needing the deletion-process of the old one. No harm either way though...it'll get deleted soon enough.
 * Nit: When you respond to someone on a talkpage, please use colons to indent subsequent responses. It helps see the flow of the conversation, and prevents comments from being displayed in the same paragraph. DMacks (talk) 16:17, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Edwin Vedejs has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Edwin Vedejs. Thanks! SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 14:47, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your helpful comments. I've added the pronunciation key for the last name "Vedejs" and used the articles in the external links section as references to support the information in the biographical information section.Davepio (talk) 16:53, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your work. I should have mentioned this in the original comment, but the Research section needs secondary sources too; as an encyclopedia and a tertiary source, Wikipedia should summarize what independent writers say about his research. In general, articles should be primarily based on secondary sources. You can, however, create a "Selected publications" section to showcase his most significant papers (see Stephen_Hawking for an example).
 * I would also recommend removing most of the chemical diagrams from the Research section; the large number of images is a bit distracting. Sorry for all the nitpicking! SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 17:04, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks again for the comments. I've cleaned up the page by removing most of the chemical diagrams, removed the reference to the Family Search document (from the biographical information section), and pushed up a secondary source that summarizes Vedejs' work (reference 8 attached to the first sentence of the "Research" section). Most of the primary sources were moved to the "Selected Publications" section. I left one chemical diagram that pictorially describe the area of chemistry for which he is most well known, i.e., mechanistic study of the Wittig reaction.Davepio (talk) 17:48, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you! I will review this soon. Just one last thing (sorry!) - the Selected publications section should be formatted as a list of citations, not as prose; see the example I linked above. You can pull the tags off of the citation templates to display them as text, like so:


 * For this section I would recommend using the list of his top 5 most cited papers from this secondary source: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10593-018-2221-2
 * Thanks again for the article. SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 17:55, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The Selected Publications section has been cleaned up and is now shown as a list of citations.Davepio (talk) 19:08, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The Selected Publications section has been cleaned up and is now shown as a list of citations.Davepio (talk) 19:08, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edwin Vedejs has been accepted
 Edwin Vedejs, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Edwin_Vedejs help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 23:40, 9 May 2020 (UTC)