User talk:Davesewell

Welcome!
Hello, Davesewell, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Ellie Darcey-Alden. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Amp71 (talk) 01:51, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

December 2012
Hello, I'm TBrandley. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Joseph Darcey-Alden because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ₮๒Я ∆и∂  ﾚ∑ㄚ  02:37, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ellie Darcey-Alden


The article Ellie Darcey-Alden has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. &#32; The nominator also raised the following concern:
 * All biographies of living people created after March 18, 2010, must have references.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. —C.Fred (talk) 05:14, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Joseph Darcey-Alden


The article Joseph Darcey-Alden has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * One TV episode and one acting job in a 14-minute film fails WP:NACTOR. No independent, reliable references.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgwhite (talk) 00:55, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Joseph Darcey-Alden for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joseph Darcey-Alden is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Joseph Darcey-Alden until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Bgwhite (talk) 05:41, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Ellie Darcey-Alden for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ellie Darcey-Alden is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ellie Darcey-Alden until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --j⚛e deckertalk 05:59, 7 January 2013 (UTC)


 * By the way, I'm passing this on, I got notified because I created the redirect that predated the article you started here. I don't (at least yet) have an opinion on the article, I'm just passing along the message.  Best, --j⚛e deckertalk 05:59, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Darcey-Alden‎ pages
I saw your comments on the Darcey-Alden‎ deletion discussion pages. Don't worry about it. Everybody around here is learning. I had to ask a question today. I've been around here awile and an admin. Only 1.4 million thing left for me to learn on Wikipedia.

The important part is that the pages were well done. You should keep writing more pages. If you ever have a question, give me a buzz on my talk page. Bgwhite (talk) 00:32, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I agree, and had to refer to some help pages yesterday. Cheers. -- Trevj (talk) 06:51, 8 January 2013 (UTC)