User talk:Davey2010/Archive 2016 1

January-July → August-December

Happy New Year
Just wanted to say Happy New Year to everyone, I hope you all have a fucking epic 2016!!!, Time to drink to my hearts content! , – Davey 2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 00:04, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Davey2010!


Happy New Year! Davey2010, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. North America1000 03:52, 1 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Happy New Year, Davey2010!


Happy New Year! Davey2010, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  10:37, 1 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Happy New Year, Davey2010!


Happy New Year! Davey2010, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 10:55, 1 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

thank you for your kind holiday greeting may this year bring peace and prosperity to you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 10:55, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
 * You're welcome and thank you :), Happy New Year - Hope it's a good one :) – Davey 2010  Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 13:13, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Davey2010
  Pr at yya  (Hello!) — is wishing you a  Happy New Year ! Welcome the  2016 . Wishing you a happy and fruitful 2016 with good health and your wishes come true! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! May the 2016 go well for you.

Spread the New Year cheer by adding to their talk page with a Happy New Year message.


 * Wow that's absolutely beautiful! :), Thank you and I wish you a very Happy New Year too :) – Davey 2010  Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 13:11, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

ha ah ha ah happy new year
thanks for your wishes, enjoy the next 50k edits and 5 years... JarrahTree 13:33, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
 * - Baha I won't!, The way this place is going I don't think I'll make it that far I honestly don't...., Anyway thanks for your wishes :) – Davey 2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 13:38, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
 * er. check my user page. you gotta swing with the idiots, and duck the self appointed geniuses to last, yawn JarrahTree 13:42, 1 January 2016 (UTC)



Happy New Year! Davey2010, Have a great New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. –Etamni &#124; &#9993; &#124; ✓ 14:01, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Davey2010!


Happy New Year! Davey2010, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. — k6ka  🍁 ( Talk ·  Contributions ) 14:45, 1 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year 2016}} to send this message


 * By the way, did you know that this edit was the last edit made in 2015, and this is the first edit of 2016? (Times in UTC, of course). — k6ka  🍁 ( Talk ·  Contributions ) 14:45, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
 * - Ahh but a page could've been deleted at 23:59:99, I'll stfu! , Strangely enough I did actually wonder what the last ever edit of 2015 was so thanks for keeping tabs :), Happy New Year :) – Davey 2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 15:21, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Davey2010!


Happy New Year! Davey2010, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Rubbish computer (Merry Christmas!: ...And a Happy New Year!) 15:46, 1 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Happy New Year


CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq — is wishing you a Happy New Year! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:New Year 1}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Happy New Year, Davey2010!


Happy New Year! Davey2010, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Ceannlann gorm (talk) 16:31, 1 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Happy new year
Thank you very much. Happy new year to you too! Cloudbound (talk) 18:15, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Davey2010!


Happy New Year! Davey2010, Hey, In case you haven't heard it before, have a fantastic New Year, and thanks for the cool New Year's greeting. Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 20:03, 1 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Happy New Year, Dave!

 * Wow that is beautiful thank you so much! :), I wish you and your family a very Happy New Year! :) – Davey 2010  Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 21:58, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

New Year's greetings...
...to you as well. Thanks very much for the kind words, and happy editing into 2016! -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 22:37, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
 * You're welcome and thank you :), Have a great day :) – Davey 2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 23:29, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

AfD discussion
Request for you to revisit the discussion at Articles for deletion/LatBus. Thanks! North America1000 11:46, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the heads up, Great start to a New Year AFD-wise, Anyway I've closed it, Thanks & Happy new Year, – Davey 2010  Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 15:38, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Happy New Year

 * You're welcome :), Awww those paws make it all christmassy again :), I hope you had a lovely Crimbo and I hope you have an epic New Year :) – Davey 2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 16:37, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Davey2010!


Happy New Year! Davey2010, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.  Gongshow   talk  19:03, 2 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year 2016}} to send this message

LatBus
The comment was actually directed to the delete !vote right above me, not your nomination. The comment was "delete or actually write an article; it's only ONE sentence." That rationale is that there is a minimum amount of content that must be written in order to pass notability guidelines. Anything less than that should be deleted which is not the case.--CNMall41 (talk) 20:13, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Ah in that case I apologize and will amend it but to be fair you never stated that, Usually most "AFD is not cleanup" !votes are 98% for the nominator which is why I obviously assumed you meant me, Thanks, – Davey 2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 20:46, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
 * No biggie. Just wanted to let you know I had no problem with your nomination. That's what consensus is. I just get frustrated when I see votes such as that with no policy based reason for keeping or deleting. Thanks again and enjoy your New Year!--CNMall41 (talk) 22:48, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
 * - Oh right sorry, I mean considering an editor directly above provided sources it seems rather stupid to !vote delete based on the fact it's a one liner as as now there were sources the !delete editor could've done something worthwhile like improve the sodding thing and then !vote Keep!..... But all of that involved common sense which they obviously was lacking!, Sorry ranting away here, Anyway thanks for your message and wishes - I hope you had a lovely Crimbo and I hope you have an epic New Year :) – Davey 2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 00:01, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Davey2010!


Happy New Year! Davey2010, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.  Mini  apolis  23:49, 2 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year 2016}} to send this message

Happy New Year, Davey2010!
<div style="border: 3px solid #FFD700; background-color: #FFFAF0; padding:0.2em 0.4em;border-radius: 1em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75);" class="plainlinks">

Happy New Year! Davey2010, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Donnie Park (talk) 01:57, 3 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Donnie Park (talk) 01:57, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Davey2010!
<div style="border: 3px solid #FFD700; background-color: #FFFAF0; padding:0.2em 0.4em;border-radius: 1em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75);" class="plainlinks">

Happy New Year! Davey2010, Have an enjoyable, prosperous and productive New Year, and thanks for your Wikipedial contributions. Clarityfiend (talk) 04:48, 3 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Thanks, I've just noticed you've been creative and changed the wording around - Well it's nice to have something different seeing as I've got about 10 of these now , Anyway thanks and I hope you have a great New Year, – Davey 2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 05:02, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Canada
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Canada. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Belated Happy New Year
I think it is still appropriate to wish you a (belated) Happy New Year and to thank you for the New Year's greeting. Sorry I am a little late. Best wishes for the New Year. Donner60 (talk) 04:52, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
 * TYou're welcome and thanks Donner, Haha late's better than never :P, Thanks and I hope you have a lovely new year : )– Davey 2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 04:55, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

New Girl
The outcome of the RfC was clear: per Template:Infobox television: "Reliable source required". Throwing in numbers without citation either in the infobox or article body is OR, and your edit goes again both the RfC and Wikipedia policy. --Tenebrae (talk) 16:05, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
 * - I disagree entirely with the RFC - By that logic everything should be sourced or removed from the infobox..... Could you explain how on earth you can cite runtimes as from where I'm sitting there's no sources except tv listings....., Seriously take a step back and ask yourself is this really worth the fuss I mean really ? .....,I'm not gonna edit war as I've said my peace there and here - I just 100% disagree with it and quite honestly it's ridiculous. – Davey 2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 16:09, 4 January 2016 (UTC)


 * We can disagree all we want, but that doesn't mean we can ignore a consensus decision. And I'm not sure why it's ridiculous to have runtimes for TV shows when we have them for movies and music recordings, but I'm not going to reargue a settled RfC. You want to edit against RfC consensus, fine. But I've contacted the closing admin and asked him to come to Talk:New Girl to help uphold consensus.


 * And as I've said on that page, unless we're making numbers up, then why wouldn't we want to cite runtimes? If you don't have a source, then it's your personal guess, and that's OR. --Tenebrae (talk) 16:13, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't call it consensus as such - Some said yay and some said nay, and the closing admin closed it whilst looking at the sky obviously, Did you have too ? ... That's just adding fuel to the fire isn't it ?, I'm like you I believe most things should be sourced but not every minor detail .... – Davey 2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 16:50, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
 * As Tenebrae has made 4 reverts I've opened a report at WP:AN3. The relevant discussion is User:Tenebrae reported by User:AussieLegend (Result: ). I've provided links to comments made by the RfC closer, including the RfC closing statement and his clarification that The RfC close has nothing to say about whether running times from reliable independent sources have to be cited inline in infoboxes, or whether citation from a source linked within the body is acceptable. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 17:10, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Ah thanks, I never even realized they were doing this everywhere, Just assumed it was this one article, As I said on the TP maybe another RFC should take place ?, Cheers, – Davey 2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 17:16, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
 * That's what the closer recommended, but it never happened. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 17:21, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Ironically, the IP's edits at New Girl are technically correct. If you look at the page in the citation that I added you will see that Season 4 episode 6 is 24 minutes long. If you look on the page above the episode list you will see a button on the left marked "Season 4". Clicking that reveals a drop-down box that allows you to select different seasons. If you select season 1, you'll see that episodes 1,2,3,6,13 and 19 are all 21 minutes long, so "21-24 minutes", which is what the IP originally added, is the actual runtime. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 06:07, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Morning, Have just this minute woke up, I had looked at the source yesterday and all eps were saying 22 minutes but I'm assuming I wasn't looking hard enough, Hang on I'll recheck, – Davey 2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 09:11, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Ah my bad as you say 24 minutes is there, I just assumed the IP wasn't a happy bunny about it being one number, Thanks for amending it, You'd really think Tenebrae would have better shit to do!. – Davey 2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 09:28, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes, learning English would be a good idea for some people. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 14:52, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
 * You've lost me? .... –– Davey 2010 Talk 15:00, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
 * - Ah bollocks sorry I didn't realize the template didn't work - "Some people" should've linked to "T"s name!, My English is absolutely fine tho ? ... Well if it's readable then I'm doing something right, Oi you know I love you man! . –– Davey 2010 Talk 15:10, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
 * No, your English is fine. I've emailed you with a deeper explanation. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 15:43, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Just read it sorry, Until now I never realized it said their name and "some other people" so I could understand if you was pissed off with me there, Right I'll shut the hell up before I confuse you even more, Again sorry for the rather stupid error!, Thanks and Happy editing. – Davey 2010 Talk 15:52, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
 * You do realise that the only people who don't make errors are dead people, don't you? Therefore, according to my impeccable logic, the more errors you make, the more alive you are. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:20, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

User:MenstrualCup
Because I find the username to be gross and disgusting (as already pointed out to you) and an embarrassment for Wikipedia. That you do not reflects your low standards. Your inane objections have made it that much harder for me to get this worthless userpage removed. Quis separabit? 16:03, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Dude the editor hasn't fucking edited since 2008 and his userpage/talkpage contains no vandalism (Unless you're offended by a smiley face!)..... So tagging his pages are moronic, pointless and not to mention a waste of time!, I agree the name's offensive but if they've not edited since 2008 then what is the point of blocking now ? ..... Do us both a favour drop the stick and concentrate on editing the encyclopedia like everyone else. – Davey 2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 16:09, 5 January 2016 (UTC)


 * "I have to ask this Rms125a@hotmail.com how on earth did you even find the name ? ... Was you looking for everything that had the name "Menstrual" 'cos if you were ... that's pretty weird!. Ah well may aswell be closed now."
 * Since you have made this personal, I would just direct you here, in case you did not read my last reply to you there. And before you ask, yes I am very proud of having shut down these two usernames -- Menstrual and Dear Diarrhœa -- as well. Quis separabit?  16:30, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
 * - Nope I'll admit I shouldn't of ever made that comment, It was just weird how you found it but after now reading your reply it all makes sense, The comment was more or less me having a bit of a laugh and wasn't meant as a personal attack but regardless of that I apologize for making that comment in the first place, I occasionally lurk "a certain website so as you can imagine I've seen and heard far worse which is maybe why I didn't seem fussed about the name, Meh I guess we're all offended by different things (For instance I find this image very niiiiiice but someone in the world was actually offended by that image so as I said we're all offended differently I guess), Anyway it's all in the past :), Onwards & Upwards as they say :) – Davey 2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 17:07, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Filipinos
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Filipinos. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Closed RFC .– Davey 2010 Talk 12:00, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q4 2015
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:35, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Donald Trump presidential campaign
Could you reopen this? If it were just a discussion of keep or delete, I think the close would be appropriate, but there's discussion of redirecting it to a couple of places. We may or may not build consensus for those, but the discussion should be able to run its course. --BDD (talk) 20:49, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
 * - I forgot to include the rest but the nominator's been nominating all of these and all have been obvious Keeps so despite the lack of !votes I assumed this would go the same way, Anyway I'll reopen, Cheers, – Davey 2010 Talk 20:55, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Ah nope that shouldn't of been closed as Snow Keep, Anyway I've opened it up, Thanks for coming here first :), Happy editing, – Davey 2010 Talk 21:01, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks! --BDD (talk) 00:24, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
 * No worries .– Davey 2010 Talk 01:29, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:08, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Yer sig
Hey Davey: Just in case you're not aware of it, your signature does not have any links in it when posted on pages. North America1000 10:17, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
 * - Oh shit ... It's because I've copied off User:Davey2010/signatures and wasn't aware they wasn't linked ... Well damnit, Had you not spotted it It would've been like that forever! , Thanks so much! :) – Davey 2010 Talk 13:44, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
 * No problemo. Actually, I'd bet that most people don't select their own user page links from their signature, since links to them are atop pages. Cheers, North America1000 14:16, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Exactly ... It'll teach me for having an Xmas sig as had I not used it I would never of needed to change it, Hopefully I've fixed them all now ... If I haven't tough luck , Thanks again for spotting that! :) – Davey 2010 Talk 14:58, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Maybe The Grinch or Scrooge changed it... North America1000 15:10, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I bet it was The Grinch the green grumpy knobhead! ... Wait I'm describing myself here . – Davey 2010 Talk 15:12, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Ugh. I struck my link above, I was trying to link to Grinch...the original. See also How the Grinch Stole Christmas!. North America1000 15:16, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
 * See also Oscar the Grouch. North America1000 15:17, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
 * The only Grinch I've ever known is sadly from the film, Wait there's an Oscar too , Would be nice if there was a "Dave the Grinch" .... Suppose I could create and link to here , – Davey 2010 Talk 15:21, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
 * WP:BOLLOCKS. North America1000 15:24, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Just some silliness from the article, Oscar "lives in a trash can. His favorite thing in life is trash, as evidenced by the song "I Love Trash". Great stuff! North America1000 15:29, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Oh yeah, and thanks for supporting my nom for Trash-talk at WP:TAFINOM! North America1000 15:31, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
 * What are you Bollocksing about ?, Probably talks a whole load of trash too! , Haha no worries - It easily relates to me lol, I actually nearly supported the Miss Earth thing too but that was purely because of that image ... but not everyone likes my WP:HOTTIE (yet to be created!) !votes so I had to Oppose :( – Davey 2010 Talk 15:50, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I think images at TAFINOM helps to make the page more fun or interesting for people. Otherwise, it's just another boring board page. If I were to nominate Shit, I'd skip the image, though. North America1000 15:53, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
 * WP:HOTTIE could likely fit somewhere at Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions, depending upon the context, of course. Check out my recent entry there at WP:DIDNOTWIN. North America1000 15:59, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Exactly it brightens the board up in more ways than one, Haha probably a good idea although I'm sure those who enjoy Coprophilia probably wouldn't be best pleased! .... ,
 * Don't you dare add HOTTIE there!, I follow IAR anyway so If It got added I would just imagine that page doesn't exist .... It's worked for everything else here so far , Wow that's a good section there - See what would we do without you ... :) – Davey 2010 Talk 16:10, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
 * WP:HOTTIE is all yours. North America1000 16:15, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Haha why thank you, Well thanks for the great discussion here - I feel like I've learned something but I'm not sure what , I'm seriously losing the plot!, Anyway Thanks again and well .... Happy Editing :) – Davey 2010 Talk 16:26, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jeremy Corbyn
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jeremy Corbyn. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Hullaballoo Wolfowitz
Hi!

In response to, this editor has reverted an edit I made which I believe was in full adherence to both WP:BLP and WP:SPS. In this particular case an actress stated on her Twitter page that she had retired. The post did not mention anyone else except her. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz deleted this info along with with other contributions, which I in hindsight realise did not fully adhere to WP:SPS as some other Twitter comments inserted in other places of the article involved other people. The relevant piece of information, however, was thrown out "with the bathwater" so to speak. Despite repeated attempts of reaching out to him on his talk page for clarifications in a civil and polite manner, Hullaballoo Wolfowitz not only refuses to answer, but incessantly carries an rude and insulting tone while also deleting my request for clarifications. If one agrees to be an editor, shouldn't one also be responsibility for motivating one's decisions as well as conducting oneself professionally in a civil manner? i don't think it's too much to ask for, is it?Holanthony (talk) 00:38, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
 * (Ah I HW beat me to reverting you by a mere second - Had I known HW beaten me to it I wouldn't of left the message), Anyway If you have an issue with him then take it to the WP:Great Dismal Swamp - Sorry that's the best advice I can give, Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 02:37, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

AfD close
Could you provide a rationale for your close at Articles for deletion/Bear Transit? It seems like most of the keep !votes are of the ITEXISTS variety. Thanks --Regards, James(talk/contribs) 20:27, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi, I don't have a rationale at all .... I simply noticed it was up for 3 weeks and assumed A.) another relist would only gain more keeps and B.) You wouldn't notice the close .... Would you like it relisted/reopened ? . – Davey 2010 Talk 20:52, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
 * If you do not have a rationale, then yes, I believe it should be relisted. --Regards, James(talk/contribs) 20:58, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I charge £1,0000 for relisting/reopening AFDs .... I only accept cheques or cash in hand . – Davey 2010 Talk 21:01, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
 * - Not sure if you've noticed but I've opened and relisted the AFD for you...... The above comment was a joke although it would be great If I could charge that amount :P, Cheers, – Davey 2010 Talk 17:25, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Monkey Kingdom
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Monkey Kingdom. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
 * (I've closed the RFC as ND. – Davey 2010 Talk 00:19, 17 January 2016 (UTC))

Templates
Drat - thought I'd removed everything suspect. Sorry about that; please feel free to override anything you run into like that. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 01:30, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Haha I did wonder why you tagged them, Meh mistakes happen :), Okie dokie thanks,Happy editing :), – Davey 2010 Talk 01:37, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * I should probably admit I did keep some of my comments to myself .... It's pretty much why I deserted it after a week, Although had I been aware of the anagram thing I'd imagine things would've got alot worse , Anyway thank you for the barnstar :) - Very much appreciated, – Davey 2010 Talk 16:42, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Why?
May I ask, why you can't have flags in your signature. Matt294069 is coming 05:44, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * It's all in WP:SIGIMAGE - Flags should only be used in the articles only ..... Sorry dude! – Davey 2010 Talk 09:32, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

AfD close
Hi Davey: Per your closure at Articles for deletion/Om beach, the redirect you set at Om beach (diff) is in error, and needs to be corrected. North America1000 20:33, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi - Ahh I see what you've done, I assumed "Gokarna, India § Beaches" was the actual link.... Probably should've tested the link first!, Thanks for notifying me anyway :), – Davey 2010 Talk 20:57, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * "§" is the section sign, used to refer to sections in documents. Thanks for the fix, cheers, North America1000 21:16, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * - Ahhh right, You have to remember I'm not the sharpest tool in the box so everything needs to be simple, I mean closing AFDs is the easiest thing in the world and I still occasionally screw up , I think I've made the same mistake sometime last year, Ah well thanks for telling me, Happy editing :) – Davey 2010 Talk 21:29, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jennifer Lawrence
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jennifer Lawrence. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Commented 3 weeks ago!..... Keep up! . – Davey 2010 Talk 02:29, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 4, 2016)
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you are involved. The thread is Davey2010, early AfD closures and incivility. Thank you. -- Red rose64 (talk) 22:58, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks!, Much appreciated!. – Davey 2010 Talk 23:27, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Up to you, but in my opinion your early closures are generally a good thing, and in many cases could be done even earlier but for silly rules. Too many articles get nominated which are obviously notable and keeps but end up there being the subject of petty disputes. Anything which reduces the time wasting is a good thing, and i've noticed your name on numerous occasions being one of the most positive aspects of AFD. So don't let them deter you, but as some of them say, remain ""Sybil" ;-)♦ Dr. Blofeld  18:34, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi, Thanks for your comment at ANI - Quite honestly It was the only thing that made me not retire!,
 * For well over a year I've closed AFDs a day early and not one person's cared (I'd say only a good handful have had an issue with early closes and for most of them editors I've reopened and relisted for them!) .... No doubt the next time I close something early some idiot will take me to ANI so it's not worth the hassle - Ironically I've seen someone taken to ANI over relisting too much so we don't win!... but there we go!,
 * Haha don't worry Doc I won't ing swear again . – Davey 2010 Talk 19:11, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
 * The whole "civility" thing on Wikipedia is a steaming pile of horseshit anyway. As has been demonstrated on countless occasions, the enforcement of "civility" by most admins is based purely on random choice or personal whim, rather than any genuine reason, moral code or system. The same people that will drag User:X to AN/I or block User:X have no qualms about being impolite, rude, insulting, discourteous or disrespectful when it suits themselves. The mighty leader is but one example... Fuck em. Doff your cap every so often, and go about your business ;) Keri (talk) 20:27, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Exactly!, It's all a bloody joke to be honest, We all swear, We all get annoyed and angry at times it's natural but whatever what's done's done there's no point moaning about it, Best to just shove it under the carpet and move on! :) – Davey 2010 Talk 20:34, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at User talk:Davey2010, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Things like this are unacceptable. m.o.p  23:31, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
 * - I have a tendency to get annoyed easily here and IRL so when you tell someone to move on and they come back for more badgering ofcourse I'm going to get annoyed ..... Obviously I didn't mean it but anyway I'll try and cut the colourful language ... Somehow . – Davey 2010 Talk 23:44, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I can appreciate that real life can be stressful, but, if you're unable to control your emotions on Wikipedia, you will face consequences. For the time being, I'd suggest you apologize to RedRose64 for the outbursts if you haven't already. In the future, if you find yourself feeling 'annoyed' or 'badgered', may I suggest walking away from the computer for a few minutes instead of being uncivil? m.o.p  23:56, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Although I don't tell anyone to FO IRL I do get annoyed and lose my patience rather easily with things ... I would love to to change but it's never going to happen but anyway even I realize my language lately is a bit much so I'll try and stop ..... Suppose I could invent a "Swear jar" but I'd be broke by the end of the week, Sad thing is tho I've had so many people want to nominate me for RFA but I've refused and you know why ? ... Me being easily annoyed/lack of patience....... Anyway I'll try & curb the colourful language, Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 00:17, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Glad to hear it. Hopefully all goes well for you. In case you forget, here is a link to Redrose64's talk page so you can leave a quick apology. Best, m.o.p  00:51, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Nope haven't forgot I'll do it all later, Thanks, happy editing, – Davey 2010 Talk 00:58, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Davey, I can't help thinking you have stumbled across User:Beeblebrox/fuck off or Eric Corbett's talk page and thought "ooh great, I'm going to tell admins to **** off now!" I sincerely hope that's not the case as that's a terrible idea that will get you enemies fast. Stick to articles. <b style="color:#7F007F">Ritchie333</b> <sup style="color:#7F007F">(talk) <sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)  10:05, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Wow I'm surprised you'd think of me like that .... I don't enjoy telling anyone to FO and after about 30 minutes I usually regret it so nope that's not the case at all .... It is just a temper problem which I'm working on .... As I said on the ANI thread I'm much better now than I used to be,
 * Anyway I'm beginning to sound like a broken record now, Thanks for your comments/message, – Davey 2010 Talk 15:57, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
 * If it's any consolation, I'm the same. <b style="color:#7F007F">Ritchie333</b> <sup style="color:#7F007F">(talk)  <sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)  16:01, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
 * People here do test your patience rather alot ... Probably too much!, To be honest they were talking to you like a complete dick but I guess saying nothing's better than going to their level and resorting to attacks & whatnot, I guess I just need a lot more patience , – Davey 2010 Talk 16:14, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Telling someone to "fuck off" is not a personal attack... WP:NOTCENSORED Keri (talk) 20:30, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:48, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

I have blocked you for a week. Hours after the discussion at ANI was closed, hours after you said there "The AFDs - I'll try not to close them so early - I'll probably take a step back for a while", what do you do? Close Articles for deletion/IMERICA after 5 days and 5 hours, and close Articles for deletion/Emily Vanderbilt Sloane after 5 days and 1 hour. Please reread the discussion and the closure, and your own comments, and Deletion process and WP:NotEarly. Fram (talk) 09:09, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

It looks like consensus is forming at ANI that the block was good. I've got a plan (assuming is happy to go along with it) which is this - you agree not to do any more non-admin AfD closes at all. My advice is, "when in doubt, vote"; that's why I don't close too many AfDs but still participate in many. If you can agree to that, and the blocking admin is comfortable with it, I am happy to unblock on the strict understanding that closing any more AfDs will result in a reblock, and it'll be longer than a week next time. How does that sound? <b style="color:#7F007F">Ritchie333</b> <sup style="color:#7F007F">(talk) <sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)  13:52, 27 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Hi Ritchie333, I was already answering the unblock request when I saw your post here. While your proposal is not a part of my unblock, and thus not a condition on my part to stay unblocked, I think it may be the best way forward. Fram (talk) 13:57, 27 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Damn edit conflicts! - - I ended up waffling on but basically said If I did it again I would expect a much longer deserved block but don't worry I'll never close one early again! (and thank you for unblocking me .... I probably don't really deserve it but you're an extremely kind admin and I won't let you or ANI down!)
 * - To be fair we all make mistakes and the early closure thing was a mistake which wouldn't be repeated (I know it may seem bullshit but I love editing here and I love closing AFDs (sad I know) but anyway I do genuinely promise not to close early ... I don't expect anyone to trust me but I know the consequences If I do the opposite... Anyway thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 14:05, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * And to be fair, if you go to the main AfD page and click on the "closing" link, it takes to you a list of articles that were nominated 7 days earlier - including (because of UTC and time zones) some that have not served the full 168 hours. What I do, since I really like to let them run for a full 7 days: I go to the day BEFORE the "closing" list. There are usually plenty of nominations there that still need closing. --MelanieN (talk) 19:01, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi, Has that been there all this time ? ..... And it's only took today to even notice that little box even existed! , So when you clicking and the previous date they're the ones that can actually be closed ? ... I don't wanna be reblocked so I'm treading very carefully now!, Thanks for the tip BTW :) – Davey 2010 Talk 19:06, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. But seriously, Davey, you DO need to work on your attitude. After the ANI, after the block, after your profuse apologies, your assurances that you understand, your promises never to do it again, after being unblocked, what is your comment when you reversed one of those 5-day closures? Seems stupid but there we are. Do you think you could manage to sound a little more accepting of the rules you have agreed to follow?--MelanieN (talk) 19:13, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Yeah probably wasn't a wise choice to add that, but IMHO the whole 7 day thing is silly .... I've never agreed with the 7 day thing and probably never will but it's one of those things I guess, I've removed that remark anyway, – Davey 2010 Talk 19:32, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I was going to suggest you post at WT:Articles for deletion and propose a shorter time, but I see you have been to that page already. Yeah, there are rules and laws I don't agree with, too, but I guess accepting rules we think are stupid (and haven't managed to get overturned) is part of living in a civilized society. --MelanieN (talk) 19:41, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * After todays drama I think it's best I just stick to 7 instead of trying to get things changed and causing more chaos here, Strangely enough I don't really have any issues with rules or laws IRL, Meh it's better to abide by "silly" rules here than ignore them & end up blocked & god knows else what! , Anyway thanks for your advice and you're always welcome here :) – Davey 2010 Talk 20:00, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks that really does mean alot so thank you :), It's just a shame that now I'm banned from closing early it means everything has to drag on and be relisted to death just for the sake of policy, Well the WP:IAR part didn't last very long!, Anyway thanks for the barnstar :), – Davey 2010 Talk 23:50, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

File:MandM Direct logo.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MandM Direct logo.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:52, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Clock
Wazzup Davey? Per your comments at Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion § Closures, an easy way to determine UTC time is to use a clock. I use the one at right on my user page. To see the most recent time post, purge the clock by selecting "refresh" on it. You have to convert the 12h format to 24h format, though. Hope this helps. "We are always running for the threele of it, threele of it..." North America1000 17:53, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Wazzzzup !, How you doing today me ol' mucker ?, Ah that's a great idea ... At the moment I tend to use the laptop clock so I guess a clock here is better, I can honestly say life was so much much simpler when I closing a day early!, Having to close near to a nominators timestamp isn't the easiest thing in the world especially when you see one's you think are fine to close, ... Ah the joys!, Anyway thanks for the little tip - Very much appreciated :) – Davey 2010 Talk 18:03, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Zup. P.s. Check out the table atop 24-hour clock for easy conversion. Peace, North America1000 18:09, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Probably shouldn't admit it but I actually prefer the 12hour clock .... I prefer the simple things in life!, Anyway thanks again, – Davey 2010 Talk 18:14, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Invitation to the Google Doodle task force
– Sent using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:54, 2 February 2016 (UTC) on behalf of WikiProject Today's articles for improvement

Need help
We need more neutral opinions here. Please help! Thanx! --SergeWoodzing (talk) 20:17, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the message :), Happy editing :), Cheers, – Davey 2010 Talk 21:38, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Live clock
I have recycled a three-month-old script that automatically shows the UTC time on top of every AfD page:

Just to prevent any ANI feuds based on 167-hour closes in the future. <span style="color: #33BBFF; font-family:Lato, monospace'">Esquivalience  t 00:54, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Google Doodle task force collaboration for 4 February 2016

 * (Note that this doodle is only targeted to German users of Google.)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benwick Bugle
Opened 07:15, 28 January 2016, closed 10:32, 4 February 2016 = 171 hours. sst ✈(conjugate) 14:26, 5 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Hi - I know it's all confusing but all AFDs need to run for the full seven days .... so basically they shouldn't be closed on the seventh day .... Instead they should be closed on the eighth day .... Does that make sense ? ...,


 * So if today was the 27th Jan then the 19th log only needs closing, 28th jan is 20th, 29th jan is 20th etc etc


 * I've done a calendar thing which should hopefully make more sense ?, Cheers, – Davey 2010 Talk 15:00, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for supporting my RfA

 * You're welcome, I'm surprised you got as many Opposes as you did but hey that's Wikipedia for ya!, Anyway Happy editing & Good luck for future RFAs (if you even run for them again ofcourse). – Davey 2010 Talk 03:04, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on this RFC
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject History/RfC on Third Reich-only military units using Germany or Nazi Germany in infoboxes. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
 * (Titled shortened due to archive box issues. – Davey 2010 Talk 13:09, 10 February 2016 (UTC))

Thanks for your support

 * You're welcome, Congratulations on getting the mop :) – Davey 2010 Talk 13:19, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:53, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

SuggestBot
Hi Dave, I see you have suggestions from SuggestBot coming on your talk page from time to time. How do you tell the bot to post suggestions on your page? I used the one on its page for my page, it sent me one suggestion and wiped out the code to tell it to post suggestions on my page from my talk page. Thanks. '''Class455fan1 (talk) 22:19, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi, Oh god I got the code around 2014 so would have no idea now, I get 2 sent every month, Did you want 2, 3 or 1 every month and I'll copy my code to your page :), BTW hope all's well :) , – Davey 2010 Talk 23:16, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks Dave, I want it thrice a month (or twice a week if possible). Everything is going well, how about you? Thanks for your help! '''Class455fan1 (talk) 07:47, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi, Weekly may not work as the bot collects over a 100 of your edits to make the suggestions I think, Anyway I'll change it to weekly but if you don't get them weekly you'll probably have to go back to monthly, No worries you're welcome :), Yeaaah everything's going alright I suppose }. – Davey 2010 Talk 15:30, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Policy discussion in progress
There is a policy discussion in progress at the Manual of Style which affects the capitalization of "Walks Like Rihanna", Smells Like Teen Spirit, &c., questions in which you previously participated. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — Llywelyn II   16:06, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

GNG and subject specific
pinged me a bit too late on Hannah Daniel AfD to contribute, but I wanted to say that confusing the OR in GNG or Subject-NG for AND is really common -- I caught myself doing that in a rewrite of WP:PROF just a few months ago. Thanks for the quick reverse! -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 17:38, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi, The most embarrassing part is I've assumed it for the best part of 3 years .... Meh to be fair this place is a constant learning curve for everyone, Anyway it's great to know I'm not the only one to confuse both here , Anyway thanks & Happy editing :) – Davey 2010 Talk 18:04, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Script problem
Per my revert here, please ensure your script isn't changes the dates in templates. -- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 05:39, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
 * - If you mean the dmy template then it's meant to ? ... It basically updates it ..... – Davey 2010 Talk 05:41, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Why? The template was added in April 2014, why would you be using a script to change it to February 2016?-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 06:01, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
 * If I'm updating all or converting all dates to a specific format then the template gets updated, It does say on the template "The month and year that the article was last checked for inconsistent date formatting. Example: 'June 2013'" so I guess really it doesn't need changing but If you have an issue you'd need to speak to the script owner, Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 06:45, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

A recent AfD closure of yours
Hello Davey! I happened to stumble upon this Afd (I didn't watchlist or follow the page) which I think you might have inaccurately closed as part of the mass AfD closure. Would you be willing to reconsider? Thanks and regards— UY Scuti <sup style="color:green; font-family:Times;">Talk  11:55, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi, My apologies for that - somehow that one was closed when I mass closed the rest so I've obviously reverted, Thanks for letting me know, Cheers, – Davey 2010 Talk 15:25, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bernie Sanders
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bernie Sanders. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Tidy up
I undid most of your "tidying" because it contradicts citation style. The  parameter is functionaliy identical to , which designates the title of the work cited, and renders it in italics to comply with style guides for titles of works. The publisher of the work is not the work per se, but the company that publishes it; the publisher of the work BBC News is the BBC. BBC News is not the publisher. ViperSnake151  Talk  03:03, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi, Oh sweet lord I've well & truly screwed up now! .... I assumed the script was infact fixing them but reading all the cite stuff again it seems I've been doing more harm than good! Ah well thanks for reverting & letting me knw (I've also removed the script before I end up causing a nuclear disaster! ).... – Davey 2010 Talk 04:09, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/London Buses route 70
Hi, you previously contributed to a deletion discussion for London bus route 403, another similar deletion discussion is ongoing at Articles for deletion/London Buses route 70 which you may wish to give your input on.

Note: I've placed (or am in the process of placing) this notification on the talk page of anyone who took part in the original deletion discussion, as the most recent similar discussion, regardless of deletion preference, which is allowable under WP:CANVASS. The only exception being if that person has already contributed, or has indicated on their profile that they are inactive.

Thanks for your time. Jeni ( talk ) 16:57, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the heads up :), Much appreciated :), – Davey 2010 Talk 17:45, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Inrethis diff
There is an editor who thinks your "keep" was not serious and was instead a joke intended to indicate delete. Might you care to return and clarify? Thanks.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 22:21, 21 February 2016 (UTC).
 * Clarified .... Well actually I've probably caused more confusion than before but whatever, Cheers for the heads up. – Davey 2010 Talk 22:46, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:57, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Penny
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Penny. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Urgh
Thanks for pointing out how forgetful I can be - I hadn't realised I'd done anything other than comment at ORCP thank you for the comments though --  samtar talk or stalk 15:53, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
 * - Sorry I didn't really wanna say anything but it was either that or be faced with 10+ 0/10s because of the new request .... Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 16:56, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peters Township Middle School
Hi Davey 2010. Just a couple of questions about the post AfD cleanup for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peters Township Middle School. How should the wikilink for the school in Peters Township School District be handled now that Peters Township Middle School redirects to that particular section of the school district's article? Should it be de-wikilinked? -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:26, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi, Yep if an article is redirected to a section where it's wikilinked then it should be delinked... otherwise you'll be going in circles lol :) Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 04:36, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
 * No worries. Just wanted to make sure. Thanks for taking another look. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:37, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
 * You're welcome, Have a nice day :), Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 04:39, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Wikiproject Food and Drink Newsletter – March 2016
– Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 17:26, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Trump: The Art of the Deal
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Trump: The Art of the Deal. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Nigeria Writing Contest
Hi Dave,

Thanks for all your contributions to Wikipedia. I will be glad if you can serve in the Jury for Wiki Loves Nigeria Writing Contest. Please, let me know what you think. Thanks. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 14:01, 3 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Hi, Sorry for the extremely delayed reply - The Echo system is completely useless as always!,


 * Anyway thanks for invitation - that's really nice of you ... but unfortunately I've never written an article in my life so I can't really judge someone elses work when I've not done any myself if that makes sense, Plus my grammer & punctuation isn't great so IMHO in the nicest way I'd probably be more of a hinderance than a help so I'm afraid I'll have to decline,


 * Thanks for the invite tho and I wish you all the best with your new Wikiproject :), – Davey 2010 Talk 23:20, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
 * No worries. You're awesome. All the best. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 23:52, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks and you're awesome too! :), Happy editing :), – Davey 2010 Talk 00:14, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

You've got mail!
GABHello! 01:19, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

March 2016
You've got an apostrophe in the wrong place on your user page, mate. Crookesmoor (talk) 16:02, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
 * IDGAF, mate. – Davey 2010 Talk 18:07, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:24, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from churning the whitespace
This is purely my personal opinion, not official WP policy or guideline or even an essay—but speaking strictly personally, I would like to ask you to refrain from edits that do not affect the rendered text, such as this edit that you made to Windows 7.

Specifics:


 * It is a habit with many to hit the space bar at least once after every period, even if the period is at the end of a paragraph. There is no effect on the rendered text, so no reason to remove it.


 * In headings such as == Text ==, it doesn't matter whether there are spaces between the equal signs and the heading text. The spaces don't affect the rendered text.

Note that if a particular style of using whitespace or newlines or etc. in the wikitext is considered an "optional style", then changing them purely for personal preference is contrary to an Arbcom ruling.

I'm not reverting these changes (although as I work on the article in the future it may well be "migrated" back to my preferred style) and I certainly am not going to bring any "cases" anywhere. The reason I'm leaving you this note is to ask you to consider: While such edits do not affect the text seen by the reader, they do increase editor workload. They complicate the editing history of the article and make diffs between versions more time-consuming to go through. Many of these changes, particularly removal or addition of individual spaces, can be difficult to see and evaluate in the diffs display. This can sometimes cause a lot of wasted time and effort for later editors trying to figure out what a previous edit has done.

All because of edits that do not improve the article for the reader, not in the slightest detail.

Thank you for considering this suggestion. I realize you are acting in good faith to improve the encyclopedia as you see it, but please consider that you are making unnecessary work for those who follow you. Jeh (talk) 17:19, 18 March 2016 (UTC)


 * There's no need for whitespaces on any article... and I tidy the headers as yeah it does look tidier and as far as I'm aware is generally preferred over == X ==, I disagree they don't complicate anything whatsoever - Infact the removal of whitespaces and the header tidying is actually helpful here and IMHO I do believe I'm improving the encyclopedia although not much (Compared to content creators etc I barely do fuck all but I like to think my edits here are actually helpful to everyone even if it's minimal help).... So I'll carry on but thanks for your opinion/suggestion. – Davey 2010 Talk 17:55, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I agree with Jeh. As I understand it, Rich Farmbrough was sanctioned for annoying editors by making such content-free edits and so doing this may be perilous. Andrew D. (talk) 18:41, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I've been doing these edits for well over a year and not one person's ever had an issue so clearly it doesn't annoy anyone and unlike Richards edits these aren't controversial nor annoying!. – Davey 2010 Talk 18:45, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
 * My impression is that Davey is being told that such edits are annoying. This has not bothered me directly – I just happened to see this conversation on my watchlist.  My point in commenting is to warn Davey that he risks getting the same treatment as Rich.  I'm not familiar with the exact details though so it may be helpful to have him explain. Andrew D. (talk) 18:53, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
 * These are the least annoying edits anyone can ever make and out of the 500000 of these edits ever made only one person apparently has an issue with it so therefore my edits aren't annoying to most and my impression is they're more helpful than a hinderance (If people legit had an issue I'm sure they would've said something much sooner and it certainly would've been more than one person!. There's absolutely no risks with my edits as I'm not changing ENGVAR .... I'm removing whitespace/tidying headers .... hardly worth the fuss and drama over!. – Davey 2010 Talk 19:04, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Andrew D. I would be very careful in ascribing the reasons for sanctions unless you are in possession of all the facts.
 * However I would advise Davey that making edits which do not change the rendered article does risk attracting unwelcome consequences. I am glad that you have not been in any conflict over this to date, that is not a guarantee for the future.
 * All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 19:19, 18 March 2016 (UTC).

I'm with you on this, Dave. 100% — Gareth Griffith-Jones &#124; The Welsh &#124; Buzzard &#124; 18:56, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi Gareth, Thanks!, You'd seriously think people would have much better things to do in their spare time but there we go!, How are you anyway :). – Davey 2010 Talk 19:04, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

AFD
What exactly happened here ?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Zonal_Welfare_Council

Greek Legend (talk) 01:35, 19 March 2016 (UTC)


 * - Some moron blanked the AFD so I've restored it, Thanks for letting me know, I'm assuming that moron is related to the council....., Cheers, – Davey 2010 Talk 01:42, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

a loon
I think it was a reasonable concern to raise. The article creator has a username that indicates a strong identification with Christianity and a user page and contributions almost entirely about Christian music. The editor who pinged other editors also has a userbox identifying them as Christian, and the list of people pinged includes a user whose username is literally a sentence about loving Christian music and several other editors who have userboxes identifying them as Christian. Seriously, you call that being a loon? I made every effort to be civil about voicing my concern and made no accusations of ill intent, and in fact several times made clear that I was NOT intending to make such accusations. Given that help is needed at AfD, why would you want to be incivil to someone who is trying to help? valereee (talk) 09:32, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
 * - You said and I quote "I'm a little concerned that everyone pinged to this article seem to be members of the Christian music project - To me you're saying you believe every !voter above you was a member all because they !voted Keep? .... or am I missing something here?, TCB hasn't (as far as I can see) pinged anyone either?, If you don't wanna be called a loon then it's probably a good idea not to act like one isn't it? – Davey 2010 Talk 16:51, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Wow. Okay, nevermind. valereee (talk) 20:29, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:48, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Clarawood
Hi Davey, I don't know if I'm allowed to ask you this or not but I will anyway, what do you think of the page Clarawood. I need another opinion. CDRL102 (talk) 13:04, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi - The images need to be shrunk and that text is waaay to promotional, My best suggestion would be to go to WP;AFC otherwise this'll ended up deleted me thinks, Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 17:09, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * That's what I said on the talk page, but the creator of the article is basically reverting everyone's edits, including mine when I try to fix it. What should we do? AfD? CDRL102 (talk) 17:21, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * - To be absolutely honest I was going to AFD it myself but as you've edited it quite alot and have asked what improvements should be made I think it would've been dickish of me to just AFD it hence suggesting AFC .... but yep personally I think AFD is the best option for this, Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 17:26, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * BTW Sorry for not replying earlier - What with the ANI crap I ended up forgetting to reply to you, Anyway I'll shut up now!, Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 17:27, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅ - I've sent it to AFD Articles for deletion/Clarawood, Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 17:44, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Cheers Davey! CDRL102 (talk) 18:00, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * No Worries – Davey 2010 Talk 18:44, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Clarawood


A tag has been placed on Clarawood requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:28, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks - I'd completely forgot to tag it, Good job someone's on the ball!, Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 01:16, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Reintroduced, etc. listed at RFD
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Reintroduced, Reintroducing, Reintroduction, and Reintroductions. Since you have had some involvement with the Reintroduced, Reintroducing, Reintroduction, and Reintroductions redirects (i.e. Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 February 5), you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — Godsy (TALK<sub style="margin-left:-2.0ex;"> CONT ) 03:52, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 04:27, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
 * — Godsy (TALK<sub style="margin-left:-2.0ex;"> CONT ) 04:30, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Lord Uxbridge's leg
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Lord Uxbridge's leg. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Cuchiniș River
Please translate for foreigner : what are SPI and SK? Ardomlank (talk) 21:11, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi, Sorry it's a bad habit!, Anyway SPI is SockPuppet Investigation and SK is Speedy Keep, Hope that helps, Cheers, – Davey 2010 Talk 21:29, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Ardomlank (talk) 21:59, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
 * You're welcome :) – Davey 2010 Talk 22:07, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

WP:AFG
Explain??? Bosley John Bosley (talk) 01:51, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
 * - What's Assume Faith Good ? .... That's new to me!....., Anyway what's there to explain ? .... You wanted to let ANI know your keyboard wasn't working .....Maybe you wasn't trolling but either way it didn't belong on there. – Davey 2010 Talk 02:28, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
 * It was your opportunity to explain how WP:Prick does not apply to you. Bosley John Bosley (talk) 03:10, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Hahaha fuck off troll!. – Davey 2010 Talk 03:37, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

hello, can u please have a look at my suggestions on karan singh grover page
regardsYummymoron (talk) 04:08, 26 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Will do, thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 04:12, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

User:Uhooep AfDs
Hi, I've just found another three AfD discussions initiated by User:Uhooep that you did not close as speedy keep. Graemp (talk) 10:22, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Articles for deletion/Inigo Bing
 * Articles for deletion/John Charles Price
 * Articles for deletion/John Reddihough


 * Hi, I'm not sure why these were never closed as I'm sure I went through the entire log, Anyway I'll look through their AFD nominations on Labs to make sure I've got them all, Thanks for the heads up, – Davey 2010 Talk 15:25, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Apart from one amendment to one outcome there wasn't any more to be closed... So it looks like they've all been closed at long last :), Anyway thanks for the heads up, – Davey 2010 Talk 15:32, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

hello, can u please have a look at my suggestions on karan singh grover talk page
regardsYummymoron (talk) 04:08, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Fedor Emelianenko
Emelianenko has stated in interviews that he's of Russian ethnicity. I added it to the article, with references. I fail to see how that's "edit warring," or why you tried to revert me? Since when is it not relevant to write ethnicity in the "early life" section?


 * Hi, I personally don't care either way but the moment the bloke reverted you you should've gone to the talkpage as per WP:BRD, Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 21:47, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
 * The talk page is important, and if there were a place to disagree or argue, I'd go there. However, think about it! Emelianenko has stated that he's of Russian ethnicity, there's nothing to debate, it's a fact. So I added it to the article, with references (numerous references, in fact). The person who reverted me had no reason to revert me! I have no idea who he is, but I make sure that mine are referenced and relevant.
 * Have you seen his edit summary when reverting me? "Undo POV pushing edits. This isn't an article about the Ukraine, Russia or politics, it's about an MMA fighter." That doesn't even make sense! I added information that he refused to fight under a Ukrainian flag when making a PRIDE debut. However, that's also a referenced fact, I'm not trying to push a POV there. It's relevant as the organisation had to change the rules for him. And yet he not only removed that, but all of my edits, which included the part about being of Russian ethnicity.
 * Sorry I had't actually realized you sourced the info, I'm not sure what his beef is but I've accepted the revision - If he does revert for some stupid reason just go to the talkpage - Ips are't exactly liked here so admins tend to block IPs even if they're right so regardless of whose right or wrong it's probbaly best to go there so you can say atleast you made an effort!, Anyway waffling on...., I've accepted the revision anyway :)
 * Thanks & Happy editing, – Davey 2010 Talk 01:09, 1 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Hi,
 * As you're an admin (I haven't realised that), can I ask you to intervene on that article? And to comment on the following two sources:

 


 * I think someone has gotten the impression that I'm the one edit warring, and reverts me without actually trying to understand the situation (he has neither commented on the content nor on the talk page).


 * As you're an admin, can I request for your intervention on the article?


 * Hi IP, Ah sorry I'm not an admin, I could still give me 2cents but not sure it'd mean much in that respect, I guess you could go through WP:category:List of admins and ask one of them, Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 14:20, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure where the list is so my next best advice is to perhaps go to WP:AN or WP:ANI and ask an admin for help, Sorry I couldn't be much help ,– Davey 2010 Talk 14:23, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I think it would definitely help if you commented there, as you saw the thing starting in the first place :-)

AfD
Hi : A recent edit you performed at AfD has been reverted. You may want to check it out. North America1000 03:27, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Hahaha holy shit that is very good!, I actually thought you reverted me, Hang on let me self-trout myself!

Happy April fools :) – Davey 2010 Talk 13:00, 1 April 2016 (UTC)


 * God damnit, I should've known that was coming and yet still click it obliviously , There's a discussion at ANI about you, You should probably click here to see the thread, I'm not lying NA1k I'd never do that  – Davey 2010 Talk 13:40, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked

 * Stop x nuvola.svg You are blocked until 1200 GMT+1 today for not posting enough. Happy April Fools Dave! Nordic   Dragon  09:43, 1 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Hahaha oh god okay I'll make 30,000 edits a day how's that :D,
 * Happy April fools day . – Davey 2010 Talk 13:02, 1 April 2016 (UTC)



Smash!

You've been squished by a whale! Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something. North America1000 13:08, 1 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Sweet lord that is beautiful!, I had no idea we even had a Whale-trout temp!, I learn something new everyday . – Davey 2010 Talk 13:36, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I forget something new every day. North America1000 13:58, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I suppose we'll all reach that age at somepoint . – Davey 2010 Talk 14:03, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Unblock request

 * I'm fully inclined to unblock you, but feel it would only be fair to get input from other editors first. Also you haven't mentioned your lack of vandalism - I feel this needs to be addressed as well. Optimist on the run (talk) 17:43, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
 * - How can I forget the vandalism, I'll go on a vandalism spree as well, I'll vandalize every article here and then I'll use AWB to create more chaos and once completed that I'll then rollback every editor and admin (including WMF) on the site too, Even reports at VP & ANI .... I'll rollback the lot, I feel my actions above overall are an improvement to the project and would go far as to say I'd be an asset to the project . – Davey 2010 Talk 18:22, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Arr thanks !, I have to admit I've actually made myself laugh aswell, Well I suppose it's something different .... The only tricky part is that I'll have to come up with something different and better next year , Anyway thanks for the barnstar - Very much appreciated :), Have a great day, – Davey 2010 Talk 21:57, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

<div style="-ms-transform: scaleX(-1) scaleY(-1); -moz-transform: scaleX(-1) scaleY(-1); -o-transform: scaleX(-1) scaleY(-1); -webkit-transform: scaleX(-1) scaleY(-1); transform: scaleX(-1) scaleY(-1); display: inline-block;">
 * Good luck! Optimist on the run (talk) 23:07, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Haha thanks :) – Davey 2010 Talk 15:19, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Wikiproject Food and Drink Newsletter – April 2016
– Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 17:00, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Reversion
Hi : A recent edit you performed at MfD has been reverted. You may want to check it out. North America1000 23:47, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the heads up. – Davey 2010 Talk 00:03, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
 * god damnit I've clicked that damn link 3 times in the space of a day, god damnit NA , – Davey 2010 Talk 00:06, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Liar. North America1000 02:12, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Okay I'm lying? .............– Davey 2010 Talk 02:56, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
 * It was another April Fool's Day joke......Cheers, North America1000 21:01, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Whooosh straight over my head, Ah well thanks lol :) – Davey 2010 Talk 21:16, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Dr. Luke
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Dr. Luke. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Closure of Articles for deletion/Morning Star (Nat King Cole song)
While this may look like an obvious Keep result, none of the editors at the discussion has provided any policy-based rationale that adequately addresses the notability concerns of the article. Of the 4 sources in the article, only 1 source is about the article topic. I would recommend you to revert your closure and relist the discussion. SST flyer 08:30, 4 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Hi, To be absolutely honest I'm not sure why I'd closed it as you're right none of the !votes (bar one) seemed to make any sense ...., Anyway have reopened & listed for you :), Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 14:33, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Weronika Rosati
Hi, I am in the process of expanding this article and I desperately need your help. I started to write about a legal case and I find it really difficult to write about this matter, becuase English is not my first language and when it comes to use specialist terminology I struggle, so I hope that you can help me. I have written everything and all I need you to do for me is to read it through and simply correct my mistakes, grammar etc., I'll be grateful. Thanks in advance.

"Esther, one of the characters in Żuławski's book Nocnik, was allegedly based on Rosati and described their intimate relationship. In 2010, the actress filed a lawsuit against Żuławski and the book's publisher, and claimed 200 000 PLN, public apology for the invasion of her privacy and the deprivation of her dignity as a woman, and to stop the violation of her personal rights by withdrawing the book from sale. In February 2014, Żuławski and the book's publisher have been ordered by the district court in Warsaw, to pay 100 000 PLN to Rosati and release a public apology for the possibility of associating the actress with the book's fictional character and therefore assigning her abusive and false features. The defendants launched an appeal, however, in May 2015 they lost the appeal and the verdict from February 2014 has been upheld by the appeal court in Warsaw."

ArturSik (talk) 03:14, 5 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Hi, I should probably admit I'm not perfect with grammar etc, I haven't spotted any mistakes but It's probably best you ask who knows more about this than me, Sorry I couldn't be of much help, Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 03:30, 5 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Thanks anyway. ArturSik (talk) 03:31, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
 * No worries, Happy editing :) – Davey 2010 Talk 03:35, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:35, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Donald Trump
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Some dim sum for you!

 * Thanks, They look lovely! :), Thanks for all your contributions here too :) – Davey 2010 Talk 13:54, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Wikicology arbitration case opened
You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Arbitration/Requests/Case/Wikicology. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Arbitration/Requests/Case/Wikicology/Evidence. Please add your evidence by April 22, 2016, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Arbitration/Requests/Case/Wikicology/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:57, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
 * The message was sent using the case's MassMessage list. Unless you are a party, you may remove your name from the list to stop receiving notifications regarding the case.

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2016
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:15, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Article
Hi,

May I ask why you removed the "official site" from an article that was reviewed, and permitted by an Admin? You can't override an Admin's permission, you don't have the authority. Thank you (Mona778 (talk) 01:48, 11 April 2016 (UTC))


 * Hi, Sorry what article you talking about ?, I'm currently busy with another article so all over the place now , Cheers, – Davey 2010 Talk 01:57, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I've removed her official site as it only includes a massive image of herself and about 4 links to social media sites ..... Kinda pointless to include, The link was probably not checked by any admin and anyone can add and remove a link ... doesn't need to be permitted by any admin, If an admin's unhappy with me removing the useless link I'm sure they'd let me know  ..... Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 02:13, 11 April 2016 (UTC)


 * My antivirus doesn't like the website, malicious attack warning, though it could be wrong. With two issues being raised now: removing it, at least for the time being, seems to be the best option at this point. — Godsy (TALK<sub style="margin-left:-2.0ex;"> CONT ) 05:47, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi - Ah I didn't have any warnings about the site, If it does contain a virus then it obviously shouldn't ever be included (well not until it's removed/fixed anyway), Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 14:23, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Mona778 (talk) 05:50, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Clarawood123 (talk) 13:31, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

A beer for you!

 * Hi, No worries it's all good, I admit the joke part at the end wasn't ideal but I was trying to I guess lighten the mood abit, It was never my intention to offend the blockee nor joke around but I apologize anyway, Thanks for the beer :) – Davey 2010 Talk 03:06, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Did someone say beer? Jeni ( talk ) 09:38, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Yeeeees!, Here have one on me!, Infact have 5 on me lol, – Davey 2010 Talk 11:37, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Those edits to AnnaSophia Robb
I commented on the IP's talk page here. Next attempt I'm going to request semi-prot and also raise an ANI report for BLP, DIDNTHEAR, and NOTHERE. Jeh (talk) 17:07, 12 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Hi, Me thinks the article's gonna need protecting as I won't be surprised if they return at some point to revert, I wasn't aware they've vandalized it previously hence the recent comment, Anyway I've given them a final warning which I'm sure will make all the difference!, – Davey 2010 Talk 17:29, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Just spotted your edit summary ... and I'm abit lost- Am I supposed to have a plus sign here or somewhere? ... I'm confused ... I know doesn't take alot to confuse me! . – Davey 2010 Talk 17:36, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * If you look at the tabs above most talk pages (IME) you'll see a tab with a + sign between the "Edit" and "View history" tabs. That's for "start a new section". This may be a setting in your preferences. No biggie.
 * Re the IP, the previous attempts make their intentions quite clear, and no amount of wrapping it in "lots of memes said..." is going to erase that. Jeh (talk) 18:09, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * As far as I can recall I've never seen that so either I've disabled something or you've perhaps enabled something, I have no idea sorry,
 * I haven't checked the IPs talkpage until now and didn't even know they'd vandalized the article, I just assumed the meme thing was their first edit, Ah well thanks anyway, – Davey 2010 Talk 18:40, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

A pie for you!

 * Hi Marnette, Arr thank you :), I would never ever trout you .... even if you done something extremely bad ... I still wouldn't :), Thanks for the pie it was lovely :P, – Davey 2010 Talk 14:08, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jamalul Kiram III
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jamalul Kiram III. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Closed RFC. – Davey 2010 Talk 04:34, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

List of Friday Download episodes
You got your wish. The page is locked and all those Nine Inch Nails, Puddle of Mudd and Megadeth references that were for some reason bugging you have been taken out of the page. Your wish was their command. 86.46.226.231 (talk) 14:51, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

1. You provided no cites, 2. There is no "Molly Ringwald", 3. Your trolling is pathetic, 3/10. – Davey 2010 Talk 15:18, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
 * No Molly Ringwald? Really? Who was the red haired girl in Sixteen Candles, Pretty in Pink and the Breakfast Club then? 86.46.208.21 (talk) 15:37, 16 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Hello D. Is there any background on this troll. They are currently IP hopping to changed sourced info on the article . Cheers. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 17:01, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi - I have no idea who they are, Since July last year they've been changing the episode summaries on Friday DOwnload to incorrect stuff (IE Marilyn Manson, "Molly Ringwald" etc), I really have no idea how this could be stopped...., Cheers, – Davey 2010 Talk 17:12, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the update D. I meant to let you know that I have put in a WP:RFPP for this article - and now I have :-) MarnetteD&#124;Talk 17:13, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Forgot to say sorry for the long delay - Was binge-watching IZombie :), Anyway problem is tho is that when that article's protected they'll then change IPs and move to a new article and someone could take their edits as legit .... I'm wondering if somehow blocking their IPs is the best solution here?, Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 17:17, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Revert, block, ignore. Keri (talk) 17:29, 16 April 2016 (UTC)


 * No worries at all D. Binge watching should always take precedence :-) I know that range blocks are possible but I don't know the details. Also a list of the IPs is needed to for any admins to determine whether one is feasible. Your vigilance in dealing with this is a boon to WikiP. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 17:33, 16 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Keri RBI is fine as far as it goes. It does not address the situation when the same person editing from a new IP enters fake info in an article that is not on an actives editors whatchlist. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 17:33, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Marnette -Haha very true :), Ah right well getting them would be pretty much impossible,
 * Keri - That's kinda the point tho .... The moment they're blocked they're back with a new IP .... So It's harder to block and certainly impossible to ignore ... especially when it's been going on for nearly a year but anywho noted. – Davey 2010 Talk 17:37, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

ScoopWhoop AfD
Wow. That was fast. I think it was clearly headed toward keep, too. I provided my own sources and I !voted that way. But to do a non-admin closure on an AfD that's only been open 13 hours seems unfair to the nom, who might have been given a little more time to retract the nomination on his own, and to be rushing things. An AfD normally goes 7 days. However foregone the outcome, was there some urgency here? I don't think you've done anything clearly wrong, but I think your judgement could have been better. Msnicki (talk) 19:57, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Haha I don't waste time!, It was evident the nom hadn't followed BEFORE as seeing as there was sources provided, I'm not being dragged back to ANI so I'll just reopen it, Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 20:02, 16 April 2016 (UTC)


 * I don't think you were ever risking a trip to ANI but I did think you might leave some hurt feelings with the nom. I think you made a good choice.  Thanks.  Msnicki (talk) 20:38, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
 * - You'd be surprised at the amount of times I've been dragged there all over stupid reasons so didn't wanna give anyone another reason!, BTW I wasn't trying to say you would - I meant someone overall :), Anyway thanks for asking first :), Cheers, – Davey 2010 Talk 21:09, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Sidney Sanabria
Hi Dave, you're good? Sidney Sanabria showed up on WP:BADAFD, I removed the Afd and added an Old AfD multi to the talk page. If you are using a script to close at AfD you may want to report this case. Best, Sam Sailor Talk! 08:52, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi Sam, Yeah not too bad thanks how's you?, I use the AFD script so it obviously should've removed & added them for me, I check the AFDs after every close but never the articles/talkpages as usually an error happens around once a year or every other year so seems stupid to check every single one, Anyway thanks for removing & adding them for me - Much appreciated,
 * I've reported the issue here - It could just be the script having a funny 5 minutes..., Cheers, – Davey 2010 Talk 14:19, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I believe you are right that User:Mr.Z-man/closeAFD2.js works well most of the time. Personally I usually check that it did what was expected of it. A quicker alternative would be to Ctrl + Shift + y to see that the script at least touched both article and article talk, although it's not a 100% guarantee. Personally I have no problem fixing things like this, after all we run around covering each other's back all day here. But we also know that there's the odd wanker who will oppose at RfA for the most silly things. See you around, Sam Sailor Talk! 17:28, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Not sure why but Ctrl, Shift & Y doesn't do anything ? ... not entirely sure what it's meant to do lol, This place has gone to shit and it's only getting worse so I don't plan on running for RFA anytime soon, I'll save the rest of my rant for my little head lol, See you around mate, – Davey 2010 Talk 18:24, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Oh bugger, that's Alt + Shift + y ofcoz ... so much for trying to be clever. Ta, Sam Sailor Talk! 19:31, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
 * It's Monday - Everyone's usually half asleep on Monday lol, That's pretty cool I think I'll use that more often! - Thanks for the little tip :), – Davey 2010 Talk 19:41, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Gamaliel and others arbitration case opened
You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gamaliel and others. The scope of this case is Gamaliel's recent actions (both administrative and otherwise), especially related to the Signpost April Fools Joke. The case will also examine the conduct of other editors who are directly involved in disputes with Gamaliel. The case is strictly intended to examine user conduct and alleged policy violations and will not examine broader topic areas. The clerks have been instructed to remove evidence which does not meet these requirements. The drafters will add additional parties as required during the case. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gamaliel and others/Evidence.

Please add your evidence by May 2, 2016, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gamaliel and others/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. ''This notification is being sent to those listed on the case notification list. If you do not wish to recieve further notifications, you are welcome to opt-out on that page.'' For the Arbitration Committee, Kevin ( aka L235 ·&#32; t ·&#32; c) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Re: Doombot
You do realize this is inappropriate right? Not the revert itself but the reason for it. AfD is not a redirect/merge discussion. Yamamoto Ichiro (talk) 16:07, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Nothing inappropriate about it - You closed the AFD as No Consensus and then redirected it 3-4 hours later even when half of the !votes at the AFD were Merge/Redirect anyway ....., All articles where the nom wants to merge or redirect end up at AFD so it's set in stone if you like, Either way the only inapropriate actions so far are yours .... – Davey 2010 Talk 16:12, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
 * "If you wish to merge articles, do not use a deletion discussion, but instead discuss it on the talk page." -- from WP:DELPRO Yamamoto Ichiro (talk) 16:15, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
 * In theory Merges should be discussed on the talkpages however some editors send the article to AFD and suggest Merging which is fine. – Davey 2010 Talk 16:27, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 08:03, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Marlon Brando
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Marlon Brando. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Editor of the Week&thinsp;: nominations needed!
The Editor of the Week initiative has been recognizing editors since 2013 for their hard work and dedication. Editing Wikipedia can be disheartening and tedious at times; the weekly Editor of the Week award lets its recipients know that their positive behaviour and collaborative spirit is appreciated. The response from the honorees has been enthusiastic and thankful.

The list of nominees is running short, and so new nominations are needed for consideration. Have you come across someone in your editing circle who deserves a pat on the back for improving article prose regularly, making it easier to understand? Or perhaps someone has stepped in to mediate a contentious dispute, and did an excellent job. Do you know someone who hasn't received many accolades and is deserving of greater renown? Is there an editor who does lots of little tasks well, such as cleaning up citations?

Please help us thank editors who display sustained patterns of excellence, working tirelessly in the background out of the spotlight, by submitting your nomination for Editor of the Week today!

Sent on behalf of <em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:black">Buster Seven  <em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:black"> Talk  for the Editor of the Week initiative by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:18, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Erwin Mortier
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Erwin Mortier. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Closed. – Davey 2010 Talk 14:35, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

My mistake
Sorry, I didn't notice that I could only close AfD discussions in which I wasn't involved. Thank you for re-opening it. Linguist 111 talk 13:40, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi - You should never ever close an AFD in which you've participated in - That's the first rule of AFD here, No worries we all make mistakes :), Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 13:44, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

dr.

File:Galloway logo.png orphaned, to be deleted
File:Galloway logo.png, which you uploaded under a non-free use claim, is no longer used and thus deletable in 7 days. (The standard talkpage template, omitted per your editnotice: Template:di-orphaned fair use-notice.) It's probably not copyrightable in the United States, though, so could be retagged  and retained on that basis, provided there's reason to retain it at all. —Cryptic 02:21, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi, Ah sorry I meant I don't like these templates - I don't mind those notification-type ones you send :), Ah okay thanks - I feel awful now as I noticed this this morning but assumed it was the standard template which is kinda why I ended up going to Commons etc, Anyway thanks for the personalized message & for the heads up :) – Davey 2010 Talk 18:47, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

User:Boomerthegrey
This account has continued to vandalize articles today: See this. You already gave them a "last" warning, so I'll leave it up to you to obtain the block. -- Ssilvers (talk) 23:26, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I had a strange feeling they'd be back, I've reported them at AIV so just have to wait I guess, Thanks for the heads up, – Davey 2010 Talk 23:38, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:45, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Best Of Friends Presenters.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Best Of Friends Presenters.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 20:55, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi, In layman's terms could you please explain why you've nominated the file ? .... All 3 of the presenters don't have images here so I'm not sure how they can be replaced? ....., thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 23:21, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
 * The reason I nominated the file is because I believe that it fails to satisfy Non-free content criteria point 1, "No free equivalent". In particular, this image is an example of unacceptable use as outlined in Non-free content for images example #1, "Pictures of people still alive, groups still active, and buildings still standing".  It's not sufficient that a non-free image does not exist or cannot be found.  It must also be the case that a non-free image cannot be created.  In the case of living people, it is almost always the case that a free image of the living person could possibly be created.  I hope that explains why I made the nomination.  BTW, a free image does exist for Ortis Deley.  See File:Ortis Deley.jpg.  Regards. -- Whpq (talk) 13:51, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
 * - So basically what you're saying is there should be individual and free images of the presenters instead of this image ? Sorry I've never understood any of this and am just about getting my head around it all ,
 * Thanks for your help so far, – Davey 2010 Talk 15:16, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes, individual free images of each of the presenters would be fine. -- Whpq (talk) 19:49, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Ahhh right, Looking through the images here I've realized there isn't any "presenter" images, It makes sense ... (after rereading it 20 thousand times!, Thanks for your help & patience - Much appreciated, – Davey 2010 Talk 19:56, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Lazaro Mangubat
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Lazaro Mangubat. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 5 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Closed. – Davey 2010 Talk 22:31, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

A beer for you!

 * Arr thanks :), I'm rather surprised this place hasn't killed my humour here but I suppose I shouldn't talk too soon ,
 * Thanks for the beer & thanks for your contributions too :), – Davey 2010 Talk 10:37, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

A cheeseburger for you!

 * Did someone say cheeseburger?! Davey is learning that if someone mentions food or beer, I appear :P Jeni  ( talk ) 08:53, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Mmmm yummy! . – Davey 2010 Talk 10:57, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Manhunt International 2014 (4th nomination)
Even though the consensus, so far, was pretty heavily "delete", you closed this by moving the article to Manhunt International 2013, which does not solve any of the article's problems. May I ask why? Since the article on Manhunt International says the last competition was in 2012, this article is probably a hoax whether set in 2013 or 2014. ubiquity (talk) 13:55, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
 * - Read the AFD again ...., – Davey 2010 Talk 14:02, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Koshi Bird Observatory
Okay so I found the page Koshi Bird Observatory, which you put that the afd was voted to be a redirect last month, yet it is still there, and not a redirect to anything! Wanted to point this out!Wgolf (talk) 17:55, 11 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Hi, I'm not sure what happened there, I'm assuming I forgot to put the target in when I closed, Anyway all fixed now, Thanks for letting me know :), Cheers, – Davey 2010 Talk 18:02, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Emma Watson
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Emma Watson. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Fake RfA
That fake RfA was probably by a sock of. He does lots of nuisance edits like that. You probably reverted vandalism by one of his socks and caught his attention. He usually goes after me or McGeddon, but I guess now he likes you better. Well, whoever it was, at least you got a bit of excitement in your day, right? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:25, 12 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Ah right, I wasn't sure if it was a sock or simply a troll, Oh great I'd rather he didn't like me, Haha true – Davey 2010 Talk 12:59, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Edit conflicts
Marnette is wrong. As I commented at their talk page, my comment was posted well before the close, and caught up in a confict with Ponyo's comment. There's no justification for removing a comment in those circumstances, and it's certainly not policy. My phone rang, I clicked "save page" and answered it, had to deal with some urgent family business, and didn't immediately see the edit conflict. So please restore my comment, which I do intend to refer to in a related discussion, and simplify that one. Also note that Mrnette reoved the relevant comment from their talk page with a rude edit summary. Comments that are lost before a close not only may be reinstated, but should be. (And, according to my phone, the incoming call came about four minutes after Ponyo's edit, nearly an hour before the close. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006.  (talk) 20:59, 12 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Sorry to hear that and I appreciate you're fucked off however it's the way AFD is - I've more than once had edit conflicts with closures but I've shrugged it off & moved on which with the greatest of respect is what you should be doing despite the background to it, As I said if you made it (or edit conflicted with it) 5 minutes after I wouldn't care but 20 minutes is way to long and seeing as It was deleted your !vote wouldn't make a blind bit of difference would it ?, If we allowed everyone to post after AFDs it'd be anarchy and probably extremely confusing!, – Davey 2010 Talk 21:10, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jean Lapierre
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jean Lapierre. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Eurovision redirects
Thanks Davey for nominating those ESC redirects that you came across (Esc2001, Esc2003, and Esc2017). I agree that they shouldn't be made and assuming that the creator of them isn't fully aware of the redirect procedures. I also came across more of them, Jesc 2010 and Jesc 2011. I have a feeling there will be more for all ESC, JESC and maybe even the Turkvizyon contests that will need mass RfD-ing.  Wes Mouse  &#10002;  09:50, 17 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Found another one Esc 98.  Wes Mouse  &#10002;  09:51, 17 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Just got in so sorry for the extremely late reply - No worries, I think you're right it's just a case of the creator having no idea, I've noticed the JESC ones too but wasn't sure if they're the same as ESC ones ?,
 * If they are the same setup then I can move the lot if you want, Cheers, – Davey 2010 Talk 14:51, 17 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Ah I didn't search pre 2000 - O'll get around to the lot later, Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 14:51, 17 May 2016 (UTC)


 * I think those are the only ones, to be honest. I looked for more and couldn't find any. Bit strange that that they don't really follow on in chronological order, they're very sporadic. I've not checked for any TSC (Turkvizyon Song Contest) though. But it might be an idea to merge all of the nominations into one, and then if we do find more before the discussion is closed, then they can be added to the list.  Wes Mouse  &#10002;  15:24, 17 May 2016 (UTC)


 * I wish they were in order it'd make life easier, I have merged the ESC2001 & 2003 and now the 98 one but What I plan to do is write down all of the JESC (or remaining ESC) ones and then hopefully come Saturday I'll nominate the lot as a bundle .... Tthat's the plan .... whether it'll work is another matter entirely, Anyway thanks for your help(& votes! :) ), – Davey 2010 Talk 17:55, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:20, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Guess What?
I LOVE LILY SO MUCH!! 125.238.46.132 (talk) 01:39, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
 * - Guess what ? ..... I LOVE LILY MORE THAN YOU . – Davey 2010 Talk 13:13, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

A beer for you!

 * Hi, I'm so sorry I completely missed this!, Haha same here - It's stressful in real life and then you come here and your stress levels go through the bloody roof! , Yeah I'm okay thanks how's you :), Welcome back btw :) – Davey 2010 Talk 13:09, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:2016 U.S.–Iran naval incident
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2016 U.S.–Iran naval incident. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Pride 2016
As a participant of WikiProject LGBT studies, you are invited to participate in the third annual Wiki Loves Pride campaign, which runs through the month of June. The purpose of the campaign is to create and improve content related to LGBT culture and history. How can you help?
 * Create or improve LGBT-related Wikipedia pages and showcase the results of your work here
 * Document local LGBT culture and history by taking pictures at pride events and uploading your images to Wikimedia Commons
 * Contribute to an LGBT-related task force at another Wikimedia project (Wikidata, Wikimedia Commons, Wikivoyage, etc.)

Looking for topics? The Tasks page, which you are welcome to update, offers some ideas and wanted articles.

This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. The group's mission is to develop LGBT-related content across all Wikimedia projects, in all languages. Visit the affiliate's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's talk page.

Thanks, and happy editing! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 19:54, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Boloria selene, Geograph.jpg
Hi Davey2010, why did you decline my rename request and revert my edits on this file? The species identification mistake here is obvious and non-controversial...--LamBoet (talk) 07:36, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi - I apologize as I originally assumed you were a troll/vandalizing so my apologies for that, How do you know the butterfly is a "Argynnis aglaja" and not a "Boloria selene" - Is there any differences between the 2 ?,
 * Obviously I have no idea about butterflys so I need to make sure I know what you're suggesting's correct,
 * Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 10:32, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
 * That's OK, if you are not familiar with butterflies, I understand that it is not so obvious. If you want to convince yourself, you can compare this B. selene to this A. aglaja : you will find differences e.g. in general wing shape (more rounded for selene), marginal markings (selene doesn't have a double marginal line) and many other details.
 * You would be suprised at the percentage of identification errors among wikimedia.org insect pictures, and this one is just an easy one... --LamBoet (talk) 12:17, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
 * - Oh god that's even more confusing, Well I'm putting all my trust in you being correct so I'm hoping you are but anyway so I'll move it over for you :) – Davey 2010 Talk 12:22, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Good, thanks :) --LamBoet (talk) 12:28, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
 * - Done :), Thanks for coming here - Much appreciated :) – Davey 2010 Talk 12:30, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:09, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey
The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.
 * Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:49, 1 June 2016 (UTC)


 * ✅. – Davey 2010 Talk 23:00, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gamaliel and others closed
An arbitration case regarding Gamaliel and others has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted: For the Arbitration Committee, Kevin ( aka L235 ·&#32; t ·&#32; c) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:38, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Gamaliel is admonished for multiple breaches of Wikipedia policies and guidelines including for disrupting Wikipedia to make a point, removing a speedy deletion notice from a page he created, casting aspersions, and perpetuating what other editors believed to be a BLP violation.
 * 2) DHeyward and Gamaliel are indefinitely prohibited from interacting with or discussing each other anywhere on Wikipedia, subject to the usual exemptions.
 * 3) is admonished for engaging in incivility and personal attacks on other editors. He is reminded that all editors are expected to engage respectfully and civilly with each other and to avoid making personal attacks.
 * 4) For conduct which was below the standard expected of an administrator — namely making an incivil and inflammatory close summary on ANI, in which he perpetuated the perceived BLP violation and failed to adequately summarise the discussion — JzG is admonished.
 * 5) Arkon is reminded that edit warring, even if exempt, is rarely an alternative to discussing the dispute with involved editors, as suggested at WP:CLOSECHALLENGE.
 * 6) The community is encouraged to hold an RfC to supplement the existing WP:BLPTALK policy by developing further guidance on managing disputes about material involving living persons when that material appears outside of article space and is not directly related to article-content decisions.
 * Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard

Muhammad Ali
Considering the article went years with just the boxing infobox and considering the section of the manual of style WP:INFOBOXPURPOSE says "The less information it contains, the more effectively it serves that purpose, allowing readers to identify key facts at a glance." if anybody needs to try to gain a consensus on regarding that 2nd infobox, its you or whoever initially added it.--<span style="background-color:; color:;"> 717 12:43, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
 * - Well if that's the case then whoever added it should've got consensus first however I simply saw you removing it stating "it's unneeded" so ofcourse I'm going to revert but anyway to make life a fuckton easier you should get consensus on the TP, I never added it in the first place and I had no idea it was never there for a few years ....., but anyway RFC's the best choice. – Davey 2010 Talk 14:25, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I totally understand no worries. But I agree totally with you on that but since he's died recently there's been a million edits, I don't really feel like combing through all those edits to find who did it and tell them lol.--<span style="background-color:; color:;"> 717 05:35, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Saw you added the infobox back. It was added on the 4th so it's only been up for a couple of days, and another editor edit warred with who added it initially. However, with that being said, it doesn't change the fact it is unneeded and that goes against the quote I put in on the original post I made on here because the less information it contains the better and the reason the editor added was to "add more information" therefore it directly violates it.--<span style="background-color:; color:;"> 717 05:51, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Bundled articles
Hi Dave, you're good? At WP:BADAFD the articles
 * Dando Cocotazos
 * Haciendo El Amor Con La Ropa
 * Mazakote Mixtape: Gold Edition Vol. 1
 * Nueva Generación

were listed with links to closed AfD's, as they were bundled at Articles for deletion/Speedy (musician). I have removed the AfD template and added, I hope that's fine with you. Sam Sailor Talk! 11:24, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi, Yah I'm good thanks you okay?, Ah I assumed the nominator had removed them upon closing the AFD ? ... Anyways thanks for kindly removing them :), – Davey 2010 Talk 14:27, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Vandalism
I do apologize for my lack of understanding re the AFD process. However, warning me for vandalism (when clearly there was no intent to vandalize) is really unfair. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 00:05, 9 June 2016 (UTC)


 * , I actually clicked disruptive editing but I don't think one for it and it just went with vandalism regardless of what I selected, No worries and I apologize if I came across a bit harsh but with the greatest of respect you wouldn't be happy if after closing 20 odd you then realize there's 60+ more (I didn't have to close them but if I closed 5-15 then I may aswell do the lot), Anyway it's all in the past, New day & all that :) – Davey 2010 Talk 00:39, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Question
What do you mean by RM as all non-notable & pr notguide? THEY are notable if you watch the newscast.

Soafy (talk) 22:19, 9 June 2016 (UTC)Soafy


 * Notability isn't proven just by them doing their job! - There needs to be reliable sources etc but that aside we're not a directory, There's a policy/guideline somewhere that says something along of the lines of presenters lists are discouraged ... Not sure where it is and I'm currently busy at the moment. – Davey 2010 Talk 22:26, 9 June 2016 (UTC)


 * How do we do it and by the way, it is coming off from your Italian wikipedia page of RaiNews24. Soafy (talk) 22:23, 9 June 2016 (UTC)Soafy


 * Read WP:CITE etc etc, Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 22:26, 9 June 2016 (UTC)


 * You actually made a mistake as I believe the journalists were there before I added in the news anchor a few months ago. Also, does video and/or forums with pictures of the news anchor in the RaiNews24 newsroom count as a source or no? Please response when you have time. Soafy (talk) 21:25, 13 June 2016 (UTC)Soafy


 * Hi, I'm so sorry I'd completely forgot to reply, Unfortunately pictures aren't sources either :(, There needs to be written information saying they're newscaster of RA News 24, If you can't find any written stuff then I'm afraid the list can't be added back, Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 22:23, 14 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Do twitter accounts count as sources like this one: https://twitter.com/cacimac and what about this as a source: http://telegiornaliste.freeforumzone.com/discussione.aspx?idd=9854925


 * Nope no forums either sorry, If any of the newscasters have tweeted they're at RA 24 then I'd allow that but actual twitter accounts aren't proof sorry – Davey 2010 Talk 23:26, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
 * BTW you don't need to ping me - I get a big yellow bar telling me I have a new message :) – Davey 2010 Talk 23:27, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

How do I even cite them? Could you like show me how? They sources I placed their are reliable. Soafy (talk) 10:45, 16 June 2016 (UTC)Soaf


 * - If you don't know how to cite stuff then it may be a better idea for you to find another hobby, Adding the list back can and will get you blocked, Thanks and happy editing, – Davey 2010 Talk 13:31, 16 June 2016 (UTC)


 * , So I cited some sources on the Rai News 24 pages of the directors. I was curious if these counts as sources that they work for RaiNews24


 * LinkedIn (https://www.linkedin.com/in/maria-claudia-origlia-72791769)
 * Twitter (https://twitter.com/j_alessio)


 * Please response when ever you have time. Soafy (talk) 19:08, 16 June 2016 (UTC)Soaf


 * Nope sorry, – Davey 2010 Talk 20:28, 16 June 2016 (UTC)


 * So I added in the tweets that they work for RaiNews24 but I am stuck on the title, author, and publisher. Would you please check if I did those part right? I think I messed it up. Soafy (talk) 22:46, 17 June 2016 (UTC)


 * - You've done it correctly :) The only bit that didn't need to be added were the authors but apart from you've done it perfectly - Well done! :) – Davey 2010 Talk 22:54, 17 June 2016 (UTC)


 * I am looking at this but is it really a good source? http://www.inforegioni.rai.it/it/credits.php and this http://www.rainews.it/dl/rainews/media/ReadOn-inglese-si-impara-leggendo-9d232e53-27d8-4bff-b331-6149aa06e807.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soafy (talk • contribs) 23:53, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
 * First source is perfect, The second is a video which cant be used, Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 00:17, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

2016 Orlando nightclub shooting
Apparently, reFill caused a rather large edit conflict. It may be wise to wait to fill bare refs until the numbers of editors/edits go down. Cheers! &#128406; ATS /  Talk  20:40, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi, Oh christ, Well I'm not sure why the edit conflict page never showed .... I just hit save and it saved .... But ofcourse I won't use it until it's died down but I assumed the edit conflict page would've popped up ? (I've never used refill on a busy page before ... and don't think I will do ever again!), Anyway thanks for the heads up, – Davey 2010 Talk 20:46, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Edit conflict
No problem&mdash;bugs are part of the wiki experience! All the best Neutralitytalk 20:58, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * That's very true, Suppose it'd be boring without them!, Anyway thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 21:03, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Volvo B10M
Hello again sir, I just remembered long ago on the Wikipedia page of SBS Transit the Volvo B10M Mark I Van Houl was featured but was deleted. Hope that you can help! Sbs882y Sbs882y (talk) 01:14, 13 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Hi, As many have been edit warring over it I've removed it all, Sorry dude, – Davey 2010 Talk 01:41, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Edit on SBS Transit
Hi, I know there is some edit war going on there, and that the source I provided does not have all the models. I am wondering whether this source is better since it is mostly accurate with the missing models, but people will revert because it is a "blog". http://landtransportguru.net/bus/bus-infrastructure/bus-models/ 33ryantan (talk) 02:07, 13 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Hi, Ah that source can't be used as you're right it is a blog, Ummm my best suggestion would be to use Flickr, Technically it's not a source however it proves the bus exists and that it's with SBS .... and you're not going to get much better than that, Some editors may try and remove it tho but it's worth a shot, Cheers, – Davey 2010 Talk 02:18, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Corina Abraham
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Corina Abraham. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:27, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * - I didn't really do fuck all but thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 22:42, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Jurong
Please reopen this RM. It was only open for 2 days. There is no harm leaving it open for a full week. SST flyer  02:30, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
 * - ✅ - I never bothered checking the disamb and had I done so I wouldn't closed so early but anyways thanks for coming here. – Davey 2010 Talk 02:54, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:European migrant crisis
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:European migrant crisis. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Help needed on this page
I need help on TGR as I will delete the news anchor part but anyway to organize it as there are many regions in Italy. Also, there are 0 informations on the news anchor/presenters but all coming from videos I watched a few months back but got any tips to get the source? Are you reading this? Soafy (talk) 20:02, 25 June 2016 (UTC)Soafy

Slackintosh AfD
You closed this as merge, but the article is unsourced and there's no mention of this at the target, nor is there a suitable subsection anchor. Could you relist this? MSJapan (talk) 23:47, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
 * - Reopened and relisted, Thanks,. – Davey 2010 Talk 23:55, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:55, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:23, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
 * - My god was it last year ? ... Only feels like yesterday I'd gotten it, Time certainly flys!, Anyway thanks for the little box :), Happy editing, – Davey 2010 Talk 16:26, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Some prosciutto and cheese sandwiches for you!

 * Thanks Northamerica1000 & thanks for your contributions here too, Happy editing, – Davey 2010 Talk 12:07, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2016
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Tony Scherman
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Tony Scherman. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:49, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Trouted
You have been trouted for: no reason for whatsoever no reason that is non existent that has no validity in the Wikipedia community and is considered humors according to WP:AN/I which is funded by secret administrators working for WP:ARBCOM who want to destroy Wikipedia and want to block IP addresses based on no reason and no logical sense or any justice, de facto vs de jure and this may be considered humors or vandalism. You choose.. Have a nice day, my friend. Sincerely, <b style="color:limegreen">Ḉɱ̍</b> 2nd anniv.   22:31, 23 July 2016 (UTC) (formally CookieMonster755)
 * Hahahaha thanks, I thought here we go what have I done now and to my surprise it was a joke , Thanks for the trout! , Thanks and I hope you have a nice day too my friend :), – Davey 2010 Talk 22:37, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Mercy Career & Technical High School
Someone overrode the two closed RM and moved it here anyway. I personally don't find "it's the school's preferred branding" to be a compelling argument. You got the mop, I'll let you deal with it. John from Idegon (talk) 03:54, 24 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Hi - I have some bad news ... I'm not an admin!, I just saw the move, Realized they'd gone against consensus and moved it back, If you believe & is fine I have no objections to you moving it, Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 04:05, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
 * My dad had a saying that seems to apply here (not pointing at you of course): "Some people could screw up a wet dream." Wait, should the period be inside or outside the quotation marks? Lol. Keep on keeping on, Davey. John from Idegon (talk) 18:17, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Hahaha love it!!!, Will do John and you ermm ... keep on keeping on too – Davey 2010 Talk 18:59, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Wright streetlite
I've added that information as I work for stagecoach and know the information I provided is accurate Aaron6288 (talk) 20:08, 24 July 2016 (UTC)


 * First you need to read WP:COI then you need to read WP:SOURCE, Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 21:43, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Request for your comment
Hi! I see that you commented at Articles_for_deletion/London_Buses_route_116. You may be interested in commenting at this new Article for Deletion nomination Articles for deletion/London Buses route 53. Best wishes, jcc (tea and biscuits) 09:21, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Updated userpage for you
Hi Davey, thought I'd update your userpage, it appears you have gone up on post counts!! Also, poke your nose in here, have AfD'd a few articles you may be interested in... Ta for now Nordic   Nightfury  10:49, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi, Cool name!, Wait there's another editor called Nordic something ... Think it was "Nordic Dragon" but not sure .... Is Nordic a new thing for usernames here now ? , Anyway I'm so so so so so grateful for you updating the count and I really appreciate it .... however I've had to revert you as I only do it yearly if that, The big edit counter userbox thingy pretty much gets the same treatment, Sorry!, I do appreciate it tho it was extremely kind of you!, Thanks & Happy editing :), – Davey 2010 Talk 16:03, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I changed it, was Nordic Dragon before ;) Nordic   Nightfury  09:59, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I know but I only change it yearly :), Oh wait you've had a rename, Shit I didn't even realize , – Davey 2010 Talk 12:15, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathaniel Ru
Really? A NAC of Articles for deletion/Nathaniel Ru just hours after a relist? Could you please explain? duffbeerforme (talk) 11:32, 26 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Hi, When a closer relists an AFD the AFD should then be removed from that log ..... As you can see [|here] it wasn't & I failed to see the date of the relist, I just saw 3 relists and closed it, I've reopened it again, Thanks for patiently waiting instead of reverting - It's much appreciated :), – Davey 2010 Talk 15:45, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
 * That link won't work now but anyway it's been relisted and this time the relist succeeded!, Thanks again for waiting patiently and for your message, Cheers, – Davey 2010 Talk 15:53, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:12, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Theresa May
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Theresa May. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Discussion on SCHOOLOUTCOMES and verifiability
Since you commented here, I though I should alert you to this related discussion Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_deletion/Common_outcomes started by and. There are similar discussions going on at multiple AfDs so I thought it is better if this is discussed at a central location. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 02:26, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Ah thanks ), There was also another discussion not long ago on another board somewhere .... might of been Village Pump but not sure, Anyway thanks for letting me know, Happy editing, – Davey 2010 Talk 03:09, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
 * (and, Let me  just take this opportunity to butt in rudely and point out that that discussion was closed nearly four months ago, and like the 20 or so on the same topic over the years, its outcome (pun?) was the same. We all  know that OUTCOMES is not an essay, but it is a neutral and accurate documentation of the way we handle things and how school articles benefit from special consideration as stipulated by the Founder, , evidence of 1000s of school articles hat have survived these AfDs (nominated mostly by people who don't know about OUTCOMES anyway), their exemption from A7, and  the  long  vote by , our most  knowledgeable admin on  notability, on one of these  recent school AfDs. I know you all mean well, but having been around as the co-ord of WP:WPSCH for 8 years I'm certain that nothing will change. We  obviously however, need to delete the ones that are blatant spam, but those are mainly high street cram schools rather than High schools. I wouldn't really make an issue of it, but over the last two years or so, our entire AfD and NPP systems have degenerated almost to a farce, and we need all the help we can get. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:58, 30 July 2016 (UTC)