User talk:DaveyPop

Your submission at Articles for creation
 You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia&. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Glacialfox (talk) 01:37, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Your article has been moved to AfC space
Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:DaveyPop/Linda wolfe has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Linda wolfe, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 17:12, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.)
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the [ reviewer's talk page]. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Tokyogirl79 (talk) 06:26, 8 December 2011 (UTC) This needs reliable sources to show that Wolfe passes WP:AUTHOR. Be aware that reliable sources (WP:RS) are things such as news articles from notable sources such as Dear Author, Romantic Times, New York Times, or similar that focus on her. Reviews from notable places such as the places I've just listed do help, but generally are more for showing notability for her books. Be aware that sites such as Goodreads are only considered trivial sources and not ones that are reliable and show notability. Also be aware that the author's website or anything put out by her agents or publishing company (like a press release, a mention on their website, or in an advertisement) are not considered to be reliable sources either. Since you appear to be very new to Wikipedia I wanted to make sure that you were aware of this when looking for sources. The article also needs to be edited to be more neutral in tone and a little less promotional in nature. You seem to be writing it from the viewpoint of a fan, which is discouraged on Wikipedia. I know that this must all seem to be very frustrating, but I don't want you to give up on this since it does seem that she would otherwise pass notability guidelines. We just need to find sources to prove it. I also recommend that you look into getting some help (and joining!) WikiProject Books, since this is exactly the sort of thing they like to work on. Their whole goal is to expand on authors and books in Wikipedia. If you don't mind, I'll try to help if you wouldn't mind. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 06:26, 8 December 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79
 * I did some extensive rewriting, so let me know what you think. I'm also looking for some sources to help bolster the claims in the article. You did seem to have one reference, but we need to be able to find the specific date and issue number or better yet, a link to the article itself it it's been digitally archived. If you want any of it reverted, let me know. I removed some of the articles that she'd written in the info sections since there isn't a need to excessively cite those when they're listed below her history sections. A good rule of thumb is to be informative but brief, leaving out unnecessary mentions where you can. I also edited your external link section, removing a link to youtube. We generally do not use youtube links on Wikipedia because the copyright status of the uploads can be dubious and since anyone can add a video, we can't count it as a reliable source. I did add bits that will definitely need resources found. If we can find sources for those then getting this approved should be easy. (Unfortunately since I've done so much editing I can't approve it myself now.)Tokyogirl79 (talk) 07:09, 8 December 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Linda Wolfe, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! A bunch of us worked on the article and it got added to the mainspace! Tokyogirl79 (talk) 11:02, 8 December 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79
 * You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the Help desk or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Linda Wolfe concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Linda Wolfe, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 05:24, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission Linda Wolfe


Hello DaveyPop. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Linda Wolfe.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 22:30, 22 September 2013 (UTC)