User talk:Davi118

Notability of David Wright (Academic and footballer)
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on David Wright (Academic and footballer), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because David Wright (Academic and footballer) seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting David Wright (Academic and footballer), please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 23:31, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Marasmusine (talk) 15:00, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Itunes game
A tag has been placed on Itunes game, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.  raseaC talk to me 18:02, 13 January 2010 (UTC)


 * This is in response to your comment on the above-mentioned talk page:
 * This is a genuine game played at Bristol University, the article is not entirely serious but the content is true and adds to the knowledge of Wikipedia.
 * It might be helpful to you to review the five pillars of Wikipedia. One of them explains that "Content should be verifiable with citations to reliable sources." Your assurance that it is true, with all due respect, does not meet this standard. Also, the notability guidelines are important here; even if the content can be verified, it is not necessarily notable enough to be included. Finally, your statement that "the article is not entirely serious" doesn't exactly help your case; Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a humor website.  --R'n'B (call me Russ) 19:49, 13 January 2010 (UTC)