User talk:Davi1450

Jaytech
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Jaytech, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.jaytechmusic.com/biography.php.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:17, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jaytech


A tag has been placed on Jaytech requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 06:07, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

COI
Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.&mdash; RHaworth 13:06, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Jaytech
Hello, I work for Jaytech. I had recently tried to create a wiki article for my client using some of his biography material from his website. This material is owned and written by us. The wiki page was recently taken down do due to copyright infringement. &mdash; [via-e-mail] I don't feel comfortable speaking about these matters to the public.
 * Please read the standard COI template above. We would prefer you to wait until someone with no COI writes about this guy. However if you insist on proceding: reproduce the Creative Commons licence here on to your web page. When you create the article add a clear HTML comment pointing out that you are copying CC-licenced text and repeat that info on the talk page. &mdash; RHaworth 13:06, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

What has been written in the talk page is fine as it is. I can provide the Creative Commons license, but where do I obtain that. All it is was a bio that we wrote for Jaytech ourselves. It isn't copyrighted.

Also should I just have Jaytech use another account to create this himself with the page below? Would that be eaiser?

Let me know, as I didn't realize Wikipedia was this time consuming. &mdash; [via-e-mail]


 * You are keen enough to make the article public; you must be prepared to discuss it in public. "Where do I obtain &hellip;?" For goodness sake, the licence is the sentence "text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License" which appears at the bottom of the every Wikipedia page. You do "view page source" in your browser and copy the HTML into your website - simple!
 * "Also should I just have Jaytech use another account?" Good heavens no! That is even worse: you at least are one remove from the subject of the article. If you insist on publishing, please chop that discography down to, at most, half a dozen items - you will have a link to the website where people could see the rest.
 * But I repeat: please, please do not contribute - wait until someone with no COI writes about this guy.
 * "Let me know, as I didn't realize Wikipedia was this time consuming." An archetypical response of a spammer - you just want to create a quick advert. A Wikipedia editor, which is a totally different animal, knows that contributing is time consuming but accepts it because they actually want to build an encyclopedia. &mdash; RHaworth 01:03, 13 December 2010 (UTC)