User talk:David-dalus

The Secret of Nimh
This is your last warning. Refrain from edit warring or you will be reported. LittleJerry (talk) 03:12, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Reported you here

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. LittleJerry (talk) 13:26, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at The Secret of NIMH. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. --Chris &#124; Crazycomputers (talk) 16:26, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Edit war
Your recent editing history at The Secret of NIMH shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LittleJerry (talk • contribs)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. LittleJerry (talk) 01:30, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. -- Scott Burley (talk) 02:19, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

August 2021
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for edit warring repeatedly even after being blocked multiple times. I note in particular that you have never edited an article or user talk page. If you would like to be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you understand what edit warring is and how collaboration and communication are important to editing Wikipedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. --Chris &#124; Crazycomputers (talk) 07:27, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

Monkeybone
Add this sentence, "The scene then cuts to an animated sequence where the banquet's attendants are revealed to be monkeys in diguise.", after the final sentence in the plot summary so it can have context.

Scooby-Doo 2: Monsters Unleashed
Add "ly" to the word "miraculous" in the plot summary's final paragraph and change the "and" before "celebrate" in said paragraph to "as they".

Babe: Pig in the City
Remove "the Sheep-Pig" after "Babe" in the first sentence of the plot summary.

Barnyard (film)
Change "the only surviving members of the herd" in the third paragraph of the plot summary to "its only survivors", then change the word "double-crossed" in its fourth paragraph to "deceived".