User talk:David.moreno72/Archive 12

Declined new article
Hi David how can i get my article published https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Diddi_Srihari_Rao

How can i make changes to the article submitted, do i need to add any in specific — Preceding unsigned comment added by Diddi ct (talk • contribs) 04:50, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi Diddi ct. You must read WP:YFA. Specifically where it states that 'Articles written about living persons must be referenced so that they can be verified. Biographies about living subjects that lack sources may be deleted' and the 'Are you closely connected to the article topic?' section, and the 'Articles about yourself, your family or friends, your website, a band you're in, your teacher, a word you made up, or a story you wrote' section. I was wondering, why did you try and write a Wikipedia page without even trying to read up on how to do so? David. moreno 72    04:59, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the response David, this article is about my grand father, who was dead in 1980s. I'll go through the list of requirements for publishing a person's page who is already dead. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Diddi ct (talk • contribs) 05:10, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Request on 22:11:35, 16 May 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Adamsirius
I have autism and have no idea to do what you requested. The information is correct, I do not understand your message. Apologies Adamsirius (talk) 22:11, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Robert Annan Riley III
I removed the copyvio tag that you added to Draft:Robert Annan Riley III since publications of the United States federal government are automatically in the public domain. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 12:16, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Regarding 50/50 Press Wikipedia Page
This short article has 25 citations from at least 15 different sources. Please explain what should be done to "improve citations" as all the citations have been published by reliable sources and not the business' own webpage. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mecassid (talk • contribs) 16:21, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi Mecassid. 'Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject'. Reference 1 starts with 'Our dynamic creative team' Clearly not independent. References 2, 3, 23 and 24 are the subjects own website. Clearly not independent. References 4-22 don't mention the subject and reference 25 is a brief mention. I also notice that you are closely associated with the subject. Wikipedia is not for promoting your business. DO NOT RESUBMIT. Thank you David. moreno 72    00:40, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

2019 NCAA Division I Baseball season
Can you fix that broken reference for me please do it right now for me please. 169.55.19.145 (talk) 02:09, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi 169.55.19.145. Please read WP:OBLIGATION. Thank you. David. moreno 72    02:13, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Request on 10:34:49, 21 May 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Eleanoraubrey
Could you please reinstate the draft on Edmond Brock so that I can edit it further.

Eleanoraubrey (talk) 10:34, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
 * . Even if I could, I wouldn't. Copyright violations are strictly prohibited. Please read WP:CV, especially the part where it says 'Contributors who repeatedly post copyrighted material despite appropriate warning may be blocked from editing by any administrator to prevent further problems.'. Thank you David. moreno 72    10:57, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Thank you. I was careful to write a submission that was markedly different from the source you quoted and was surprised you flagged it as a breach of copyright. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eleanoraubrey (talk • contribs) 12:49, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi Eleanoraubrey. The copyright violation was detected by this tool. Although you 'thought' what you wrote was different, it actually wasn't. What you write MUST be ENTIRELY your own words. Thank you.  David. moreno 72    12:57, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Cort Chandler
Can you verify my page please? Coleman.callan (talk) 14:47, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

david,

you have rejected my contribution and i readjusted everything. pls take a look and approve it, or comment back if there is anything else needed to be done. thanks OB — Preceding unsigned comment added by Olieboyd (talk • contribs) 15:15, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Ohm Phanphiroj' page
Hi David,

You rejected my contribution on the page I wrote. I have fixed the issue, I believe. Pls see and approve it or further comment back if there is something else that I need to look into.

thanks OB — Preceding unsigned comment added by Olieboyd (talk • contribs) 15:17, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

I do not have any direct association, except that I was asked to look and helped with the design of the site, and became aware of him and wanted to write. The issue at hand is really about how I could write and contribute because as we stand, I believe my writing did not violate any copyright materials, subsequently should not be barred from moving it forward and being green lighted. I am interested in resolving issues, and not arguing back and forth with you guys. You have requested certain things be done, and I have complied. Are there any other issues that my contribution? thanks OB — Preceding unsigned comment added by Olieboyd (talk • contribs) 15:42, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi Olieboyd. I'm sorry, but you DID violate copyright laws. At the bottom of the page that you copied from was a copyright notice, which means that under no circumstances are you permitted to copy material from that website. The policy of Wikipedia, per WP:DCP, states that only material that 'carries a copyleft notice compatible with the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License, or you have explicit permission to use it' is permitted. Also, per WP:REUSE, the text MUST be properly attributed. Thank you David. moreno 72    03:42, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.11 25 May 2018
Hello, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

ACTRIAL:
 * WP:ACREQ has been implemented. The flow at the feed has dropped back to the levels during the trial. However, the backlog is on the rise again so please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day; a backlog approaching 5,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.

Deletion tags
 * Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders. They require your further verification.

Backlog drive:
 * A backlog drive will take place from 10 through 20 June. Check out our talk page at WT:NPR for more details. NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.

Editathons
 * There will be a large increase in the number of editathons in June. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.

Paid editing - new policy
 * Now that ACTRIAL is ACREQ, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. There is a new global WMF policy that requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.

Subject-specific notability guidelines
 * The box at the right contains each of the subject-specific notability guidelines, please review any that are relevant BEFORE nominating an article for deletion.
 * Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves with the new version of the notability guidelines for organisations and companies.

Not English News Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:35, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
 * A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE. Check in Google for the language and content, tag as required, then move to draft if they do have potential.
 * Development is underway by the WMF on upgrades to the New Pages Feed, in particular ORES features that will help to identify COPYVIOs, and more granular options for selecting articles to review.
 * The next issue of The Signpost has been published. The newspaper is one of the best ways to stay up to date with news and new developments. between our newsletters.

Accept my Article
Please accept my article. I have worked on it for days and it will count as a final project grade at my school. I will be forever grateful if you are able to do so. If you can not accept it, can you please elaborate some so I know what to fix

Thanks AGTOSAEAGTOSAE (talk) 03:26, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi AGTOSAE. The article is a copyright violation and cannot be accepted. Thank you David. moreno 72    04:53, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Request on 15:36:03, 27 May 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Ian.Kirkland76
Thank you for considering one of my first attempst at a wiki page Draft:The Keith Eaton Award of the Institution of Structural Engineers The reason you gave is a lack of notability. I have improved the reference link so the reader gets to the Institution of Structural Engineers web page with this information on it. Is that what you need or do you want more? I have resubmitted it. Thanks Ian.Kirkland76 (talk) 15:36, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Ian.Kirkland76 (talk) 15:36, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Request on 14:21:26, 29 May 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Ian.Kirkland76
I will withdraw the pages you have rejected. However may I respectfully and positively make a suggestion please?

The Wikipedia policy with regard to 'notability' is entirely understandable and desirable in general. However I suggest that there are circumstances where the policy is not quite appropriate.

My reasoning is as follows. Yes of course clearly it is desirable to have multiple sources and lots of scondary sources. So, for example, a biography outlining multiple personal attainments is clearly and desirably verifiable from many sources. However in situations similar to the ones you have rejected from me i.e. awards from a single and highly regarded but specialist organisation - there is, and can be, only one primary source and necessarily all secondary sources are derivative from that primary source.

So by applying the existing policy you are debarring some legitinmate and important material from Wikipedia pages. As a newcomer to Wiki editing I have no idea how to influence general policy but perhaps you do? I would be interested to know of your reaction to my comments

Ian.Kirkland76 (talk) 14:21, 29 May 2018 (UTC) Ian.Kirkland76 (talk) 14:21, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi Ian.Kirkland76. The WP:GNG requirements are one of the key foundations of Wikipedia. As a reviewer, I often see articles that will likely never satisfy the requirement, but if it wasn't enforced, Wikipedia would quickly become bogged down with articles that most people would likely never want to read. Wikipedia is, above all, an encyclopaedia. The WP:GNG requirements maintains the high quality and popularity of Wikipedia. It is what sets it apart. I think it very highly unlikely that it will be changed. If on the other hand you can demonstrate that the subject satisfies WP:GNG, then the likelihood of the article being accepted goes up exponentially. Thank you. David. moreno 72    15:27, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Request on 17:40:26, 29 May 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Ian.Kirkland76
Thank you for your prompt reply. Without wishing to be bothersome - given the criteria how does https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Nobel_laureates_by_country comply with the notability requirements? The requirements are supposed to independent of content (of course few prizes or lists match the importance or presitige of the Nobel Prize). The references to sources on this page depend entirely on the primary source - the Nobel Prize committee.

Please understand me - I don't ask to challenge but to understand. Ian.Kirkland76 (talk) 17:40, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Ian.Kirkland76 (talk) 17:40, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

(Re-)reviewing an article for creation (please!)
Hi David,

A few weeks ago I was creating a page for Melbourne University Rugby Football Club, and submitted a barebones version while I was writing out the rest of the current content. You were AMAZINGLY fast to review the article (within about an hour! thank you!) but unfortunately the version you reviewed was the barebones version (essentially a blurb and a skeleton with hardly any references). I'm now concerned that I've muddled the version history somehow (since I was editing at the same time as the barebones article for creation was declined), and that the article is less likely to be reviewed because it was already declined.

Would you possibly be able to have another look, and let me know if there is anything obvious that needs amendment?

Thanks!

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Melbourne_University_Rugby_Football_Club Rugby union editor (talk) 07:55, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:Saleht/sandbox


Hello, David.moreno72. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 22:37, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Query

 * Hi Muhammad Ali Balti. The process is actually quite simple. All you have to do is to cite where you got the information from. See WP:REFB for instructions on how to add a reference. If the information is from your own 'personal knowledge', then you are not permitted to add it. Thank you David. moreno 72    13:24, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Request on 11:00:33, 5 June 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Mattcardew
Hi David, thanks for the quick article review. I understand your reasoning for more sources in a complete article, but it didn't think as many were needed for short stubs? Looking at the company stubs list, many have 2-3 sources and the first stub had no sources at all: 51Give. Please could you clarify this for me? Thank you.

Mattcardew (talk) 11:00, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi. The main requirement for an article is that of notability. As per WP:ORGCRITE, and I quote, 'A company, corporation, organization, group, product, or service is notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject.' The first two references are directory listings, the third is the company website, and the fourth is some press release. Clearly, it does not satisfy notability. Regarding other articles, if you consider that they do not satisfy notability requirements, you may nominate them for deletion. See WP:PROD and WP:AFD for instructions. Thank you David. moreno 72    12:06, 5 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Hi David, thank you for getting back to me on this - I appreciate your help. I'll find more sources. In terms of nominating articles for deletion, based on the notability criteria you've pointed me to, it would take a very long time. Of the sample i've looked at, not one company stub fully satisfies the criteria. I do not understand how so many have been accepted? Do they have strengths in other areas perhaps? I ask because i would like to ensure my article is the best it can be before resubmitting. Look forward to hearing from you. Thanks you for your time.Mattcardew (talk) 13:49, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Please stop!
If I resubmitted, it means I'm contesting the review. Please do not review one draft twice. Another editor can reject it if he thinks no improvement or whatever, don't act like you're some super experienced person and I'm a lowly peasant. I may not be the most competent guy here but don't use ALL CAPS AND MULTIPLE EXCLAMATIONS!! Please. Please. Please. I hope you understand TryKid (talk) 07:18, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi TryKid. There is no such thing as 'contesting the review'. The review process is designed so that after a decline the author will take notice of the issues and attempts to fix them. Next to the blue Resubmit button here is a notice that says 'Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be rejected again.' When an editor ignores this, it defeats the purpose of the AfC process and adds to the already large backlog. It has become my custom that whenever an editor disrespects this notice, the reviewer, and the AfC process, they will get the 'DO NOT RESUBMIT' notice as they are now wasting precious reviewer time. In regards to a reviewer making multiple reviews on the same submission, there is no policy that prevents this. Now, what is even more disrespectful is that you yourself are a probationary reviewer and should know better. In regards to the notability of your submission, a YouTube series with around 250k views per episode starring non notable people, and produced by a non notable organisation is hardly notable. A few million hits each, combined with significant coverage reporting on its 'viral' success would likely satisfy notability. I'm going to decline the article again per the 'Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be rejected again.' notice. Repeated contempt of this notice will be regarded as being disruptive and the article nominated for deletion. Thank you David. moreno 72    09:25, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Okay thanks for your feedback. Now, please let some competent AfC reviewer review it. You just get up and press reject reject reject. Please. Let someone else review the article. I hope you won't touch the article again. I'm begging you. Please stop. Bwy the way, notability is not about views. It is about news coverage, how can you not grasp that? 0 views or millions, it depends on news coverage.TryKid (talk) 17:21, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Stef Wolf Wolput page
Hi David, you have blocked my first wiki-article-attempt. I think I understand your comment about the notes, but I do not fully understand how to do it ... Can I count on your expertise just this once to help me out? I am a quick learner, but I loose myself in all the pages and tutorials ... Warm regards, Katrien (is the same as Katherine, but Flemish version of the name). and thanks :-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.177.225.208 (talk) 14:31, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Bhanumathy Narasimhan
Hi David, I searched extensively (couldn't find this due to typo) and created a New article on Wiki with this name Banumathi Narasimhan for this Social worker & Aurthor, Bhanumathy Narasimhan. I have all the citations and elaborated the article for this eminent lady. Can I save changes and move the article which is under review from here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Vnarsimhan/Banumathi_Narasimhan Vnarsimhan (talk) 10:39, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Need to change my draft name from "Aditya Dev - Music Producer" to "Aditya Dev"
I have used the name "Aditya Dev - Music Producer" rather than my name "Aditya Dev" as there is already a page in the name of "Aditya Dev". Please help me edit the draft name. Also, is it possible to have 2 articles on wikipedia that have the same name as my name is same as already published article "Aditya Dev".

Please help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adityadevofficial (talk • contribs) 15:13, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi Adityadevofficial. The title of the draft is the least of your worries. Presently the entire article is sourced by a video showing the subject playing the piano. Obviously this is not acceptable. The article MUST be sourced with reliable references that have significant coverage of the subject. This is a mandatory requirement per WP:V and WP:GNG. Thank you David. moreno 72    03:13, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Request on 06:10:35, 16 June 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by 2405:204:5203:9648:0:0:608:C8B1
2405:204:5203:9648:0:0:608:C8B1 (talk) 06:10, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

NPP Backlog Elimination Drive
Hello, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

We can see the light at the end of the tunnel: there are currently 2900 unreviewed articles, and 4000 unreviewed redirects.

Announcing the Backlog Elimination Drive! Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. —  Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)  06:57, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
 * As a final push, we have decided to run a backlog elimination drive from the 20th to the 30th of June.
 * Reviewers who review at least 50 articles or redirects will receive a Special Edition NPP Barnstar: NPPbarnstar SE.png. Those who review 100, 250, 500, or 1000 pages will also receive tiered awards: RR3217-0014 100 rubles USSR 1989 Gold avers.png, Swiss-Commemorative-Coin-1991-CHF-250-reverse.png, Coin of Kazakhstan 500Thinker averse.png, US-$1000-SC-1878-FR-346a-PROOF.jpg.
 * Please do not be hasty, take your time and fully review each page. It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing.

Have tried to fix my article on Planguage now
Hi, Have tried to fix my article on Planguage once more based upon your comments. I'm not paid for this work or tied to the persons behind Planguage. However, it is a shame that there has been no Wikipedia page on this quite important technology invention yet, as it is one of the first agile methodology attempts pre-dating Scrum by a decade.

Best regards, Eirik Øra — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eirikora (talk • contribs) 00:30, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
have a cat

Tophatman678 (talk) 08:26, 19 June 2018 (UTC) 

Noor Capital Markets
Hi, Can you check the article now

Farazc21 (talk) 07:28, 24 June 2018 (UTC)Faraz
 * Hi Farazc21. The article is still not suitable. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. At the moment the references are simply directory listings, or the subject's own website, which is not enough to establish notability. The key takeaway is to have at least 3 references that have significant coverage AND are independent. Thank you David. moreno 72    07:34, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Anand K. Khakhar
Another editor created Draft:Anand K. Khakhar, which you rejected for style reasons and because some things were unreferenced. I have tried to make the draft more neutral. For his scholarly publications, please see this Google Scholar search. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 01:31, 27 June 2018 (UTC) Eastmain (talk • contribs) 01:31, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Kusum Dola
Just a reminder to not edit war. Please use whatever dispute resolution procedures are necessary. Thanks 331dot (talk) 08:18, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi 331dot. I have made only two reverts, staying within the 3RR limit. The other editor has already made at least 6 reverts, just today. The user has been also been engaged in a slow burning edit war, reverting the plot section at least 10 times, plus other sections, with multiple editors. Then, he falsely accuses me of 'abusive and threatful behaviour' at AIV. Attempts at mediation on the article talk page have gone nowhere. I doubt that any futher dispute resolution will be of any benefit. Thank you David. moreno 72    08:33, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for reviewing my article
Hey, Masjid Zeenath Baksh was frankly the first article created by me and i knew there would be plenty of mistakes. I sincerely thank you for pointing out my mistakes. I will re-add the contents deleted by you for violating copyright terms but this time making it more copyright friendly. Thx once again. Adithya Pergade 07:18, 30 June 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adithya harish pergade (talk • contribs)

Dear David,

8 out of 10 challenger class pilot have a Wikipedia page. Please simply do a google search of his name and you will find more than 100news article in his English and Chinese name.

Thanks Liramak (talk) 10:07, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Draft:James Mirza
Hi David

Thanks for reviewing my band member James Mirza - unfortunately I was declined 2 times.

I was wondering if you could tell me what I need to do to get my artist approved? I don’t know if there is aomething I’m not thinking of?

Thanks so much Elle — Preceding unsigned comment added by ElleBru (talk • contribs) 07:21, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi ElleBru. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, NOT a vehicle for promoting 'your' Centre Stage Music artists. Also the subject MUST satisfy WP:MUSICBIO for an article to be written about them, and given that the majority of the references are from the subjects own website, notability has not been established. This was clearly outlined three times now in the note 'Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject'. DO NOT RESUBMIT until you have clearly (simply adding an unedited COI template is not sufficient) declared your WP:COI and WP:MUSICBIO has unambiguously been satisfied. Thank you David. moreno 72    08:42, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

My article
David.moreno72

Thanks for reviewing my changes.

Reference patents cited in my article are my ownership. I have invented the technology. I have two patents on it and I had referenced both.

Its not copy right violation.

I was asked to show third-party independent reference and thats why I had included US patent links.

Please review it again.

Thanks,

Mehta, Nehal — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mehta Nehal (talk • contribs) 12:35, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Dietapollo (talk) 18:44, 14 July 2018 (UTC)Draft:Dietapollo

Hi David, Thanks for reviewing my page. I wanted to get clarified on your feedback about my page. By external links or reliable source you mean that there should be some newspaper or magazine having article published on our product? Please clarify

Request on 17:53:29, 15 July 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Halorulez2323
I used independent sources to cite, can you let me know if there is other information I need to cite? Should I omit anything that can't be cited,so it would just a brief description of the published Albums + the two citations for each published song?

I don't care about writing a bio, I just need an image and a tracklisting/discography for the artist "SuuKool"

Please tell me what I need to fix as I've read lots of the FAQ and I'm stumped at this point.

Halorulez2323 (talk) 17:53, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi Halorulez2323. The requirements set down in WP:MUSICBIO MUST be satisfied first. This is Wikipedia policy. No exceptions. Thank you David. moreno 72    01:56, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Help
Pleasr help me i dont kwn hw to publish my article ...pls help me to publish my article Saranyasarawiki (talk) 07:08, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Thank you David Moreno (1972) for posting your thoughts on my page!
▲ — Preceding unsigned comment added by THE1ABOVEALL (talk • contribs) 16:07, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.12 30 July 2018
Hello, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

Overall the June backlog drive was a success, reducing the last 3,000 or so to below 500. However, as expected, 90% of the patrolling was done by less than 10% of reviewers. Since the drive closed, the backlog has begun to rise sharply again and is back up to nearly 1,400 already. Please help reduce this total and keep it from raising further by reviewing some articles each day.
 * June backlog drive


 * New technology, new rules
 * New features are shortly going to be added to the Special:NewPagesFeed which include a list of drafts for review, OTRS flags for COPYVIO, and more granular filter preferences. More details can be found at this page.
 * Probationary permissions: Now that PERM has been configured to allow expiry dates to all minor user rights, new NPR flag holders may sometimes be limited in the first instance to 6 months during which their work will be assessed for both quality and quantity of their reviews. This will allow admins to accord the right in borderline cases rather than make a flat out rejection.
 * Current reviewers who have had the flag for longer than 6 months but have not used the permissions since they were granted will have the flag removed, but may still request to have it granted again in the future, subject to the same probationary period, if they wish to become an active reviewer.


 * Editathons
 * Editathons will continue through August. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. —  Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)  00:00, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
 * The Signpost
 * The next issue of the monthly magazine will be out soon. The newspaper is an excellent way to stay up to date with news and new developments between our newsletters. If you have special messages to be published, or if you would like to submit an article (one about NPR perhaps?), don't hesitate to contact the editorial team here.

Reviewing an article
Dear Mr David, Thanks for the review. I have added extra references for the draft Sarode player Abanindra Maitra. Thank you. Nilima Sen. 1.8.2018 Dear Mr David, Thanks for your views regarding sarode player Abanindra Maitra. Abanindra Maitra is an internationally reputed and regarded as the leading sarode player of Sahajapore Gharana. At present he is regarded as the World's best sarode player of all times. As for external and internal sources the citations are from the Biography of Abanindra Maitra written by Mrs Sweta Banerjee, published by Hindustan publishers. Also the news reviews in many newspapers from 1974 to 2018. And Abanindra Maitra's twitter, facebook, linkedin etc If you need anything else, please do let me know. Once again thank you very much. Nilima Sen
 * Hi. The policy of Wikipedia is that biographies of living people (BLP) must be referenced. Currently, your submission has no references. Please note that this was stated in the decline notice. Thank you David. moreno 72    05:19, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Request on 10:46:36, 1 August 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Vijaiprao
Hi,

I think you said the ballotpedia page was not enough independent notable reference for Sumati Mathur/Summer Spring

Please let me know if the below links help

http://www.bethesdamagazine.com/Bethesda-Beat/2018/Election-Guide/Congressional-District-8/

http://www.bethesdamagazine.com/Bethesda-Beat/2018/Politics-Roundup-Two-Candidates-in-Montgomery-County-Slide-through-Filing-Deadline-Unopposed/

http://www.connectionnewspapers.com/news/2018/jun/13/running-marylands-8th-congressional-district/

http://lanyrd.com/2014/codeherconference2014/sddbhw/

Vijaiprao (talk) 10:46, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi Vijaiprao. Reference 1 and 3 are interviews, and so is not independent. Reference 2 is OK. Reference 4 doesn't work. There needs to be a minimum of 3 references that are independent, reliable and have significant coverage to satisfy WP:GNG. Thank you David. moreno 72    11:18, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Request on 14:47:24, 6 August 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by 68.103.78.155
Not all the links are red there are few links that are blue the 2019 MLB by team template needs to be Blue. 68.103.78.155 (talk) 14:47, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

68.103.78.155 (talk) 14:47, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Submission Query
Hi David

I have made plenty of changes to the Havana D'Primera page and believe it should show enough notability to be published

Thanks

Nick Nicksufc (talk) 18:41, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Declined AfC submissions
Hello, David. I have recently seen a number of AfC submissions which you have declined, and I have a few comments which I hope you will be willing to read and consider. I have fully agreed with your decision to decline on every occasion, but I was not so happy about the reason you gave, which was just "This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information." It is not very helpful to a new editor to be told that their work has been declined because it is not suitable, without any indication why. Personally I regard the standard drop-down reasons as inadequate, and I often type out a customised message instead, but even the standard reasons give a better indication than just "not suitable". Also, the message you give contains a link to What Wikipedia is not, but many of the submissions I have seen do not fall under any of the categories listed there; for example, I have seen a well-formatted draft of an article on a subject which looks as though it is sufficiently notable, but with no sources cited. To decline that submission was perfectly correct, but there is nothing whatever on the page What Wikipedia is not which justifies doing so, and to encourage the editor who created the draft to go to that page to find information about why it was declined will merely waste their time and perhaps bewilder them. In the page notice for this talk page you link to User:David.moreno72/essay, which gives a good summary of common reasons for declining submissions, and it would be much more helpful to new editors to be given some such information directly. Even just linking to that user space page in your decline reason would be an improvement (though not as good as giving an individual reason). All in all there are several ways that you could give more helpful information to editors, none of which would take much more time or work than what you have been doing, and some would take no more effort at all. Perhaps you would be willing to consider doing one or other of them. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:26, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi JamesBWatson. Thanks for your comments, they are very much appreciated. One favour though. Can you give some particular examples. Thank you David. moreno 72    13:33, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
Thank you for showing me the correct place to submit redirects. :)

Vecax (talk) 07:29, 12 August 2018 (UTC) 

Request on 15:10:53, 12 August 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Sag7890
Hi David.

Ivy is legitimate and well-known start-up with many recognitions and references across the web, including TechCrunch and businesswire. Can you please tell me why it was rejected and what I need to do to make it published?

Thank you, Sagie. Sag7890 (talk) 15:10, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Request on 09:45:21, 13 August 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Gwendolyn160396
Thanks for reviewing my draft,and sorry i don't know how to reply or use commands.I am new to wikipedia and would like to know what kind of references are acceptable for an article on wikipedia.There's one more thing i want to ask,that how to create a successful stub on a topic which won't get deleted ? Its regarding my article in my draft 'Shailesh Pandey'

Gwendolyn160396 (talk) 09:45, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Help
Hi David I see you recently decli my article can you please help me fix it so that it can be accepted. Liseman Mhlongo (talk) 13:47, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Hey David! Would you please be able to help me with my article?
My article is really really short. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mgmichel (talk • contribs) 21:47, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi Mgmichel. I did a Google search and found nothing about the subject. This is indicative that the subject is not notable and not suitable for a Wikipedia article as it does not satisfy WP:GNG. Thank you David. moreno 72    01:38, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Request on 06:48:24, 18 August 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Keshashah9
Keshashah9 (talk) 06:48, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi,

Please review my artical about manish giri

Request to reconsider Anushka Rajan wikipedia article
Hi David,

Request you to reconsider posting the wiki article for Anushka Rajan as she a is noted personality in India. She wrote the screenplay for the film, Irada and was also the Creative Producer for the same. The film features Naseeruddin Shah, Arshad Warsi and Divya Dutta and it won the National Film Award for Best Film on Environmental Conservation and Preservation in India. She went on a 15-day, 8000 km national train odyssey called the ‘Jagriti Yatra’ to meet the leading social and business entrepreneurs and explore rural india around the country, which inspired her to launch her own social enterprise.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irada_(2017_film) http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/Article.aspx?eid=31822&amp;articlexml=Charmed-life- 17022015002025 http://dnasyndication.com/showarticlerss.aspx?nid=C2WhsWy3dPuls3dPulsz7eks3apKrIilCWfh05Nv7gHO02SDsuL/8= https://daily.social/10-wealthy-kids-of-indian-business-tycoons-you-would-want-to-trade-your-life-with/ http://edtimes.in/2018/04/national-film-awards-2018-winners-show-smart-movies-actors-are-changing-hindi-cinema-finally/ https://daily.social/10-wealthy-kids-of-indian-business-tycoons-you-would-want-to-trade-your-life-with/

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AnushkaRajan (talk • contribs) 14:19, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Why my page is declined?
Hello,

I want to know why my article has been declined. I am unable to understand the reasons you have cited for declining the page from publishing. Please kindly give me a possible revert since it is very urgent.

Regards, Sophia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sophia346 (talk • contribs) 04:14, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Re-submission - Ittai Binnun
Hello Mr. Moreno. First of all thank very much you for going through my 1st article. I had read the reasons for your decline carefully, and made all of the necessary corrections; Iv'e added citations, References, Category, further Information and some visual editing and arrangement. I have just resubmitted today. And i would please like to add, with all honesty, that Ittai Binnun is a notable enough subject, for there are many lesser Israeli artists with wikipedia pages in English - which qualify even less. He has three albums of his own music, and a great many other projects, achievements and collaborations. I believe anyone who reads this article might see Ittai Binnun is for sure a notable figure in Israeli AND international world music. I hereby request, if possible, that you reconsider. Thank you very much for your time.Or Izekson (talk) 11:16, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Please Re-Consider Rishav Kumar's Article | He is the youngest Developer & Entrepreneur
Dear Sir, Please consider Rishav Kumar's article as he is one of the most famous youngest app developers and entrepreneurs from the World. He is one of the richest entrepreneurs benefitting from 17 of his Apps from the iOS App Store. He is a worthy person to be noted in the Wikipedia Article. Please reconsider his article. I have also provided some links in the references column that will allow you to confirm the details from trusted and reliable sources like Yahoo, CNN News, etc.

Thanking You, Have a great day ahead! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiwriterpro (talk • contribs) 12:41, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

IAGO
Hey David,

Firstly i wanna thank you for reaching out and reviewing the IAGO article i published 2 days ago so quickly, i really appreciate your time and efforts with direction, ive finally removed all wikipedia links and the subjects website and replaced these with reliable secondary sources which have narrowed down the refference links from 80+ to 31.

i look forward to reciving more feedback should you need anymore information

hve an amazing day

best regards Adam — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hoppie19911 (talk • contribs) 08:19, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

daubism
Hi David Hope this finds you well. I've resubmitted the article on Daubism. I have been operating as an artist in the area of appropriating australian landscapes since 1991. I do so because when we are presented with a european western traditional view of the australian landscape we are unwittingly presented with Terra Nullius. In other words an empty landscape devoid of indigenous culture that can be bought and owned. The Australian landscape is particularly political in this aspect perhaps like no other. The sources I have quoted are all available to view online. They are written up in Australian mainstream newspapers and also in articles online. To be honest I'm not sure how much more reliable they can be. I ask that you please review your decision and be more specific as to the reason why the article was not accepted for publication.

sincerely

Driller Drillerjet (talk) 00:01, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

brightening your day
also I'm sorry, didn't realise I was on the english WIKI, I live in DK so it's weird that I'm on the english one by default. Ah, nevermind. Enjoy the kitten :)

Sadlettuce (talk) 12:50, 13 September 2018 (UTC) 

Hi Mr.david Moreno,

I have submitted the article, in fact, the translation of the article, which is already in 10 languages (english, russian, azerbaijani, georgian, etc.) I got the message from you, that it needs to be translated into the English language. I am new to editing on Wikipedia, so I forgot to indicate that it has already the English version. Apologies for that. I have resubmitted it again. Was it the right thing to do? What should I do next.

Thank you, Guljan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guljan kg (talk • contribs) 08:28, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

How to create the translation of the page (which is in English language) in another language?
Hi Mr.David Moreno,

I have submitted the article, in fact, the translation of the article, which is already in 10 languages (english, russian, azerbaijani, georgian, etc.) I got the message from you, that it needs to be translated into the English language. I am new to editing on Wikipedia, so I forgot to indicate that it has already the English version. Apologies for that. I have resubmitted it again. Was it the right thing to do? What should I do next?

Thank you, Guljan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guljan kg (talk • contribs) 09:05, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.13 18 September 2018
Hello, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

The New Page Feed currently has 2700 unreviewed articles, up from just 500 at the start of July. For a while we were falling behind by an average of about 40 articles per day, but we have stabilised more recently. Please review some articles from the back of the queue if you can (Sort by: 'Oldest' at Special:NewPagesFeed), as we are very close to having articles older than one month.


 * Project news
 * The New Page Feed now has a new "Articles for Creation" option which will show drafts instead of articles in the feed, this shouldn't impact NPP activities and is part of the WMF's AfC Improvement Project.
 * As part of this project, the feed will have some larger updates to functionality next month. Specifically, ORES predictions will be built in, which will automatically flag articles for potential issues such as vandalism or spam. Copyright violation detection will also be added to the new page feed. See the projects's talk page for more info.


 * There are a number of coordination tasks for New Page Patrol that could use some help from experienced reviewers. See New pages patrol/Coordination for more info to see if you can help out.


 * Other
 * A new summary page of reliable sources has been created; Identifying reliable sources/Perennial sources, which summarizes existing RfCs or RSN discussions about regularly used sources.


 * Moving to Draft and Page Mover
 * Some unsuitable new articles can be best reviewed by moving them to the draft space, but reviewers need to do this carefully and sparingly. It is most useful for topics that look like they might have promise, but where the article as written would be unlikely to survive AfD. If the article can be easily fixed, or if the only issue is a lack of sourcing that is easily accessible, tagging or adding sources yourself is preferable. If sources do not appear to be available and the topic does not appear to be notable, tagging for deletion is preferable (PROD/AfD/CSD as appropriate). See additional guidance at WP:DRAFTIFY.
 * If the user moves the draft back to mainspace, or recreates it in mainspace, please do not re-draftify the article (although swapping it to maintain the page history may be advisable in the case of copy-paste moves). AfC is optional except for editors with a clear conflict of interest.
 * Articles that have been created in contravention of our paid-editing-requirements or written from a blatant NPOV perspective, or by authors with a clear COI might also be draftified at discretion.
 * The best tool for draftification is User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js(info). Kindly adapt the text in the dialogue-pop-up as necessary (the default can also be changed like this). Note that if you do not have the Page Mover userright, the redirect from main will be automatically tagged as CSD R2, but in some cases it might be better to make this a redirect to a different page instead.
 * The Page Mover userright can be useful for New Page Reviewers; occasionally page swapping is needed during NPR activities, and it helps avoid excessive R2 nominations which must be processed by admins. Note that the Page Mover userright has higher requirements than the NPR userright, and is generally given to users active at Requested Moves. Only reviewers who are very experienced and are also very active reviewers are likely to be granted it solely for NPP activities.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Help Edit a Page
Please i would like you to help edit a draft i have been working on since i have no knowledge on writing an artist page

A page you Declined it's publishing

FamousCx — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.205.114.13 (talk) 14:50, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi David,

I had submitted an article for Anushka Rajan, who is a notable young entrepreneur, who has also worked in the Bollywood. She had written the screenplay and also was the Creative Producer of the film "Irada". The imdb link of the movie "Irada" - https://www.imdb.com/title/tt6467738/?ref_=nv_sr_1 The article submitted was rejected as the references provided were not notable. Request you to kindly go though the new list of the references for Anshka Rajan's page. Wikipedia Link - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anushka_Rajan

List of References of Anshka Rajan - Article https://indianexpress.com/photos/entertainment-gallery/amitabh-bachchan-abhishek-bacchan-attend-abu-dhabi-wedding-where-was-aishwarya-rai-bachchan-see-pics-4598644/ https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/magazines/panache/ambani-mehendi-isha-shloka-go-traditional-with-floral-jewellery-priyanka-chopra-stuns-in-a-saree/shes-back/slideshow/64775096.cms https://ahmedabadmirror.indiatimes.com/columns/the-informer/bite-of-the-big-apple/articleshow/57133848.cms https://www.mid-day.com/articles/malavika-sangghvi-column-mumbai-news-columnists-peter-mukerjea-colleagues/17925182 https://indianexpress.com/article/lifestyle/fashion/amitabh-bachchan-and-abhishek-bachchan-are-giving-us-summerwedding-goals-in-these-pastel-sabyasachi-pagdis-4600690/ https://www.mid-day.com/articles/abhishek-bachchan-sridevi-sonali-bendre-abu-dhabi-wedding-inside-photos-anushka-rajan-bollywood-news/17995164 https://www.mid-day.com/articles/royal-repasts-and-party-politics-malavika-sangghvi-column-mumbai-news/18003154 https://www.thenational.ae/arts-culture/spotted-amitabh-bachchan-attends-wedding-in-abu-dhabi-1.69450 https://www.mid-day.com/articles/abhishek-father-amitabh-bachchan-song-khaike-paan-banaraswala-dance-video-bollywood-news/18002188 https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/magazines/panache/pria-kataaria-puri-hosts-mumbais-fashionistas-at-the-st-regis/articleshow/54239807.cms

Thank you. AnushkaRajan (talk) 08:35, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi AnushkaRajan. Most of the articles are about the subjects wedding, yet the article dosn't even mention the subjects wedding. References are used to support/verify statements and claims in the article. None of the references verify anything in the article. Please read WP:REFB. I also notice that your username is the same as the subject. Writing about yourself is STRONGLY discouraged. May I instead STRONGLY recommend that you use other venues such as Facebook. Thank you David. moreno 72    08:47, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Re: Draft:Xewkija Windmill
Hi David.moreno72, I have now included several more references. Should be fine now. Please specify more about notoriosity. Thanks

Claudio Vella 08:01, 30 September 2018 (UTC)tcvella — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tcvella (talk • contribs)

DRAFT:Senior's College Association of Nova Scotia
Thank you for your review of the first draft which was submitted September 28, 2018. I have re-created the Draft page, but this time, (1) the text is entirely mine and newly crafted for purpose - to avoid copyright infringement; and (2) the references are made reliable because they can be verified since I followed the {cite news} and {cite web} formats. DragonSnake (talk) 13:45, 30 September 2018 (UTC)