User talk:David0811

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! — Jeff G. (talk&#124;contribs) 13:40, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Reverting legitimate edits
I changed "libertarian" to "proprietarian" because libertarian refers to a political philosophy in favor of liberty and against control by capitalists, states, and religion, while Reason magazine is a pro-capitalist publication. Recently, a small group of pro-capitalist ideologues have attempted to corrupt the term.

See: https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/305097_2313437549536_1057325634_2623959_265884369_n.jpg http://anarchism.pageabode.com/afaq/150-years-of-libertarian — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.29.42.17 (talk) 17:22, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

May 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page User:ChrisChanSonichu has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 01:49, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Page blanked by author
Hi. Though page blanking is usually vandalism and needs to be reverted, it is worth looking first at the page history, because quite often the author has blanked his own page, as with Mary Mackey just now. In those cases the best thing is to tag it. It can be confusing for an author who realises his page is inappropriate and blanks it, if his page is at once restored and he is accused of vandalism for the blanking and told it was unconstructive. Regards,Smallman12q (talk) 20:21, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Reverts
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my userpage. I appreciate it, AndrewrpTally-ho! 20:50, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
For the reverts on my talk page today.  Tide  rolls  21:24, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Deleting bit o' vandalism
Just a note to say I deleted some vandalism posted by User:Wozwoz to your talk page—vandalism that attempted to impersonate me. Cheers! Binksternet (talk) 03:18, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for the vandalism revert on my userpage. It's really appreciated. Tim meh  !  23:29, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

How does your ...
How does your status thing work? Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk | Sign 12:00, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

90.43.116.96
The I.P. whose actions of blanking another I.P. talk page you undid. Well, for some reason he or she is doing it to a lot of diferent I.P.s Do you have any reason why an I.P. would do that? -- Abce2 | Access  Denied  18:54, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Re:Blanking
Excuse me? -- Abce2 | Access  Denied  20:16, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Bot0811
Hi David, your bot does not seem to have had approval from WP:BAG yet, since your request doesn't appear in the current discussions. Would you like to fix this, and I can approve AWB when it's been considered? Thanks. Rodhull andemu  13:18, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry to disappoint your first BRFA request. We have strict policies in running bots here to avoid damage it can possibly do. That is why we approve BRFAs from "trusted" users only. I suggest you to gain enough experience by using AWB from your own account and understand using it properly for various purposes and come to BRFA for specific tasks. Let me know if you need any help or advice. --  Tinu  Cherian  - 15:53, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

User talk:ALLAH IS ONE
Hey, If he wants to change his own talk page, let him. Sorry about the misunderstanding.

 TheSavage Norwegian  20:28, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Beastiary
Do you really think that the article needs a huge list of animals, or are you just blindly reverting because I'm not logged in? 140.180.175.90 (talk) 01:30, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Goica
Oye tambien usas huglee?  Wexeb ( Talk·Contributions ) 17:48, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Simple RFD
Hi David. I see you're still active here. Could you please visit simple:Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2012/User:David0811/Monobook-suite and tell us whether you still want to keep the draft? Thank you, Osiris (talk) 03:37, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

viral videos reverted change
thanks!

Long Term Effects of Cannabis
The change I made to the article had reasonable cause that you completely neglect to discuss. I simply removed mention of a study that had blatent cross-contamination of substance abuse, and an uncited section that has existed since 2008. Upon reading your talk page it seems you may auto-revert some articles edited by non-registered users, but the "Reason for change" section exists for a reason, and I would strongly suggest you consider taking a look at it next time you revert something. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.248.208.182 (talk) 18:29, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)