User talk:David14433

November 2013
Your recent editing history at Suicide bag shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. --Guy Macon (talk) 13:11, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment&#32;with the page Talk:Suicide bag. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead, as someone could see your test before you revert it. Thank you. --Guy Macon (talk) 06:56, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

December 2013
Your recent editing history at Suicide bag‎ shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. --Guy Macon (talk) 07:23, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Our suicide bag edits
Hi David, just stopping by to explain my end of our couple edits on the suicide bag article. I undid your edit because the see also section is for internal wikilinks only and external links go in the external links section, all per Wikipedia's Manual of Style. Here are the specific links to the sections governing see also (MOS:SEEALSO) and external links (WP:ELLAYOUT). I explained why i undid your edit in my edit summary in which i said "see also is for internal wikilinks". Afterwards you undid my edit and said "If you going to delete my link you can at least tell me why." So here i am going over it more in depth. Hopefully this helps. If you have any other questions I added your talk page to my watchlist so I'll respond probably within atleast 24 hours. Regards, —  dain  omite   20:30, 15 December 2013 (UTC)