User talk:David1982m

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

If you are interested, please join WP:USPE--William S. Saturn (talk) 00:30, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --SineBot (talk) 15:57, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

August 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page United States presidential election, 2012 has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Jeff M |  Talk2Me  |  BNosey  - 01:19, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to United States presidential election, 2012 constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you. Netalarm 01:22, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to United States presidential election, 2012. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing. Netalarm 01:22, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

United_States_presidential_election,_2012
Sir/Ma'am - I've seen your reverts on United_States_presidential_election,_2012 and I just wanted to remind you of the WP:3RR. Please take disagreements to the talk page.--TParis00ap (talk) 01:26, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --SineBot (talk) 02:18, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Your edits are being discussed at WP:AN3
You appear to have made four reverts in 24 hours at United States presidential election, 2012. This is in addition to the problem at United States Presidential approval rating, which is the one now at the noticeboard. Though you've broken 3RR, you may be able to avoid sanctions if you respond at the noticeboard and agree to stop edit warring on these articles. EdJohnston (talk) 03:24, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
Netalarm 13:04, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Indenting
Hi David. In case you didn't know, you can indent your talk page comments, so that it is clearer whom you're trying to reply to. If you're replying to someone, you should indent your comment under theirs by using a colon ":" and each colon you add indents the comment a bit more. Tim meh  03:50, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Notifying editors
Some examples of frequent editors to United States presidential election, 2012 are Hysteria18, Ratemonth, JayJasper, GoodDay, and Qqqqqq. You can just copy/paste one message onto all their talk pages requesting comment at the article's talk page. You might want to include a link to the section, such as this. Tim meh  16:22, 3 August 2009 (UTC)


 * As far as I can remember, I've never edited any election articles. David, how did you come to the conclusion that I and the other editors you contacted are "frequent editors" of such pages?--Father Goose (talk) 03:31, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

2012
I'm fine with anything, so long as nobody tries lopping the "alternative" (third party and independent) candidates into one section, or removing them entirely. FallenMorgan (talk) 02:35, 4 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Hey, David. About that CNN source, you would be able to just cite the video instead of the actual article, as long as the quote is said during the video. You might want to use Template:Cite video. Tim  meh  16:26, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --SineBot (talk) 16:51, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Please Read
I'm trying to come to a resolution once and for all. Please read what I said in the CONFLICT section of the 2012 talk page. Thanks.--Jerzeykydd (talk) 12:44, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edit
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. If you continue to disagree with the consensus, please discuss it on that article's talk page, rather than going against the other editors. Thank you! Jsharpminor (talk) 23:33, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --SineBot (talk) 02:43, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
Tim meh  ( review me ) 03:53, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Your signature
Hi Dave. I see a bot is marking all your talk page posts as unsigned. If you want to sign your posts with a certain formatting, you can just go into your preferences and edit what's in the signature box, and whenever you type ~ after a post, if will automatically sign it for you. I'm sure you'd rather do that than manually type in a signature and have a bot following you everywhere with unsigned templates. Happy editing. Tim meh  ( review me ) 21:37, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Testing my signature
--Diamond Dave (talk) 07:32, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

2012 Presidential Election
Why are you being a pain in the ass? Everyone knows Sanford and Jindal won't run. Why don't you just keep it the way it was and keep your mouth shut?--Jerzeykydd (talk) 17:01, 27 December 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry if I offended you before. I just got pissed off because we have dealt with Sanford before. I see that you contacted many other wikipedia editors and told them about the current edit war. Well, I hope we solve this once and for all. I will be civil, but I hope that every editor is reasonable. The reason why Sanford and Jindal shouldn't be in the articles is not just because of my personal opinion, it's because the articles that speculate about them simply say that they were once a potential candidate or that they will not run. If a reliable sources made an argument that Sanford could run for president in 2012, than I would agree Sanford should be kept. However, the only thing the 2 sources say is that he was once a potential candidate. I think you would understand what I'm saying further if you go to the talk page and look at what I posted.--Jerzeykydd (talk) 03:04, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * No worries, I understand. I gave my feedback on the page.  --Diamond Dave (talk) 14:48, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Comments invited
As an occasional or frequent editor of the Republican Party (United States) presidential primaries, 2012 article, your participation in this discussion would be welcome and appreciated. Thanks.--JayJasper (talk) 18:21, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

2012 Proposal
Hey. I was just curious to know if you're going to go along with your proposal in primaries article. It would be much better because it would reduce the amount of scrolling down the page.--Jerzeykydd (talk) 20:51, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

I intended to, I have just been so busy. Plus, to get it started it will be a big project and I have procrastinating it a little. Also, wanted to make sure we had enough agreement before I proceeded. I will try to give it a go this weekend. --Diamond Dave (talk) 16:04, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Republican Party (United States) presidential primaries, 2012
Please comment here for discussion about the possible addition of Phil Davison to the page.--William S. Saturn (talk) 01:12, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

September 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
--Kumioko (talk) 14:25, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

December 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
--Kumioko (talk) 04:54, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

January 2012 Newsletter for WikiProject United States and supported projects
--Kumi-Taskbot (talk) 18:54, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Request for comment
As a significant contributor to the article United States presidential election, 2016, your participation in this discussion would be helpful and appreciated. Thank you. --William S. Saturn (talk) 21:37, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)