User talk:David54G

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Prolog (talk) 12:01, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

General sanctions on abortion-related articles
Hi. You should be aware of the general sanction on abortion-related articles. ''1) No editor may make more than one (1) revert on a page within the area of conflict per twenty-four (24) hour period, excluding blatant vandalism and BLP violations. 2)Provided that a warning has first been given with a link to this decision, any uninvolved admin may impose a topic ban or blocks on disruptive editors for actions including, but not limited to, edit warring, personal attacks, excessive incivility and assumptions of bad faith. Such topic bans or blocks may be of up to three months duration. Users who violate WP:BLP within the area of conflict may also be sanctioned per this clause.''

In particular, loaded terms "abortionist" have no place in article space, unless a part of a quotation. Wikipedia articles should convey a neutral point of view. --B (talk) 06:54, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

October 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.  Esa nchez (Talk 2 me or Sign here) 00:25, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

July 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Lawrence v. Texas has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoy gabs adds 04:25, 8 July 2009 (UTC)