User talk:DavidFreeman33AD

Welcome!
Hello, DavidFreeman33AD, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to  The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Introduction tutorial
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Introduction to referencing
 * Help pages
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Doug Weller talk 18:51, 9 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the message. Please confirm what edit was removed so I can understand and learn the policy minimums. Peace.
 * DavidFreeman33AD (talk) 00:21, 18 December 2022 (UTC)DavidFreeman
 * At Richard Delgado someone reverted you for adding text to a WP:BLP without a reliable source (you added no source to text cortical of him). At Juan Diego your sources fail Reliable sources, one being a sales site and the other just an Archdiocese publication. I'm glad you asked because looking again the only source for the claim was a "questions" page which are always useless. So I deleted the whole text. Your edit at the longest running... was a mess, look at it here. [ https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_longest-running_American_broadcast_network_television_series&oldid=1127918524 ] I suggest that you ask at the Help desk about what you did wrong. The Teahouse is also a great place for new users.  Doug Weller  talk 11:17, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
 * The archbishop publication is authority within that religious realm. And it is not useless to refer to "healing" and "leaves" in a philosophical perspective using the Bible because surgeons and physicians use that as a justification for certain types of actual medications as surgical anesthesia even comes from flowers and plants.  Thus the source was correct and should not have been disrupted.  This is an objective source encyclopedia not a cherry picking and grape squashing station.  If it's true and a source, whether you like it or agree is irrelevant.  Thus archbishop sources are correct and the links between medicine and philosophies of medicine and a faith reference in the Bible is appropriate.  Please restudy the philosophy and intent of wikipedia which I suggest starts back at the Q&A section.  Thanks. DavidFreeman33AD (talk) 15:41, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
 * DavidFreeman33AD (talk) 15:42, 12 November 2023 (UTC)David Freeman
 * Rat editors should go back to the Wiki intentions and stop removing valid sources. DavidFreeman33AD (talk) 15:43, 12 November 2023 (UTC)OurLadyofSurgery

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, DavidFreeman33AD. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Trenton Garmon, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the edit COI template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see );
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see );
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 10:16, 17 December 2023 (UTC)


 * You should take the above message seriously rather than simply ignoring it and continuing to add references to Garmon. MrOllie (talk) 18:06, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Trenton Garmon
Hello, DavidFreeman33AD. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Trenton Garmon, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:06, 31 May 2024 (UTC)