User talk:DavidK93

September 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=623796067 your edit] to The Way I Am (Ingrid Michaelson song) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:02, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
 * music/cd_review/greg-laswell-three-flights/491127/content, whom Michaelson would later marry in a gymnasium where everyone present, except for Michaelson, is a clown or [[mime artist|mime]

Disambiguation link notification for January 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Evil Queen (Once Upon a Time), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nock. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Antonio Lopez-Fitzgerald, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Martin Fitzgerald. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of killings by law enforcement officers in the United States, December 2015, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lynwood. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of worlds in Once Upon a Time, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Magic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

January 2017
Your "Wish You Were Here" edit has been undone. Do not change it again. I cited the transcript to prove that the quote is proper, thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.19.112.107 (talk) 07:10, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Game of Thrones
The first comment below was originally left in the previous section; I created and titled the new section myself. --DavidK93 (talk) 18:44, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

If you're going to whittle all the season 7 episodes down to their bare bones, you might as well apply your standard to all of the episodes. That being said, you have another 60 episodes to get to work on (undo) to leave your mark everywhere. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PNH es corrupto (talk • contribs)
 * , I edited the 1224-word plot section of Stormborn down to 379 words, preserving only vital information, because MOS:TVPLOT calls for plot sections to be under 400 words. This was also the reason for my similar edits to Dragonstone (Game of Thrones).  Indeed, I hope to eventually set aside time to dedicate to performing similar edits on other Game of Thrones episode articles, because many do have plot sections that significantly exceed the guideline length.  --DavidK93 (talk) 18:44, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Winter Is Coming passed WP:GAN because someone cut down the plot summary, and a bunch of random drive-by editors built it back up again to an unreadable mess over the years. What DavidK93 has been doing is the right way of going about it and, yes, should be done with the older articles. But editing Wikipedia is voluntary, and telling anyone that they should do X if they offer to do Y is out of line with that. Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 14:09, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

This Is Us (season 2) episodes 16 & 17
Could you please do the plot summary for This Is Us (season 2) episode 16? Thanks. (And I like what you have on your user page about how to reduce the word count of plot summaries.) -- Bwefler (talk) 23:39, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm glad you like the work I've done so far. Yes, I hope to get to that one today.  --DavidK93 (talk) 13:57, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Dang, that was difficult. A whole lot of basically unrelated things happened in that episode, which makes it really hard to recap concisely. I ended up having to just let a lot of sweet, emotionally important moments go unmentioned because they weren't major plot points.  --DavidK93 (talk) 14:47, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I managed to take some words out to put some major events in. And yeah, this series is like that—a lot of things occurring... -- Bwefler (talk) 23:04, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

If you do the plot summary for episode 17, I think the life of Deja (and Shauna) should be focused on. Other flashbacks are way too brief for a purely chronological approach. Thanks. -- Bwefler (talk) 04:21, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I haven't watched yet; I download a lot of TV to my phone and watch the day after airing. I do plan to watch later today and then take a crack at the summary if needed. Thanks for the input.  --DavidK93 (talk) 14:17, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I modified your plot summary to include the shoplifting (and changed "hair loss" to "alopecia"). Otherwise, good job; thanks. -- Bwefler (talk) 23:32, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Rise (TV series) ?
Hey —I was wondering if you watched the new Rise (TV series)—the pilot followed the This Is Us (season 2) season finale. I watched maybe half of Rise but decided it wasn't for me, although I have helped with a few things on the Rise article. If you have watched it (or want to watch it), the article needs a plot summary for the pilot episode. Thanks. -- Bwefler (talk) 21:28, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I intended to watch it, but I didn't set the series recording until after the premiere. I need to watch the episode in the next few days, while it's still available on demand.  If the spirit moves me, I'll check out the article.  --DavidK93 (talk) 23:26, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
 * You could watch it online (with ads) on https://www.nbc.com/rise?nbc=1 (or is that what you meant?) Thanks. -- Bwefler (talk)
 * I watched it on TV via my cable provider's on-demand service. --DavidK93 (talk) 13:16, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Someone last night or this morning put in a 302-word summary (with poor use of casing), so I added a long plot tag and mentioned MOS:TVPLOT in my edit summary. -- Bwefler (talk) 14:33, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Good job. That was added after my last response.  Not sure I'll tackle it, though.  --DavidK93 (talk) 14:55, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks & no problem.-- Bwefler (talk) 15:48, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you! WMF Surveys, 18:25, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey
Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks! WMF Surveys, 01:23, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

'''If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again.''' We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. WMF Surveys, 00:32, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Alex Shibutani has an RFC
Alex Shibutani has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Just notifying you that I opened an RfC relating to a discussion you participated in about the Shibutani ice dance partners. Natg 19 (talk) 00:44, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Charles III requested move discussion
There is a new requested move discussion in progress for the Charles III article. Since you participated in the previous discussion, I thought you might like to know about this one. Cheers. Rreagan007 (talk) 06:34, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)