User talk:DavidLeib

Hello, I'm BigCat82. I noticed that you recently removed some content without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! BigCat82 (talk) 21:56, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Consensus before editing

 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg  Please establish a consensus before altering the Indiggo page again. See Talk:Indiggo.  cc: blocked user Indiggo77 63.247.160.139 (talk) 23:48, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

March 2014
Please stop. Wikipedia is not censored. Any further changes which have the effect of censoring an article, such as you did to Indiggo, will be regarded as vandalism. If you continue in this manner, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ian.thomson (talk) 23:55, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Indiggo, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Ian.thomson (talk) 00:01, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Indiggo shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. ''You are already well past the three revert point. You need to stop right now and discuss your issues on the talk page''.  Ish dar  ian  00:09, 4 March 2014 (UTC)